ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A time course analysis was undertaken to evaluate how perioperative process-of-care and outcome measures evolved after implementation of an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) program. METHODS: Outcome and process-of-care measures were compared between patients undergoing major elective thoracic surgery during a 9-month pre-ERATS implementation period to those at 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9 months post-ERATS implementation. Outcome measures included length of stay, the 30-day readmission rate, 30-day emergency department visits, and minor and major adverse events. Process measures included first time to activity, out-of-bed, ambulation, fluid diet, diet as tolerated, as well as removal of the first and last chest tube, epidural, patient-controlled analgesia, and Foley and intravenous catheters. RESULTS: In total, 704 patients (352 pre-ERATS, 352 post-ERATS) were included. Mobilization-related process measures, including time to first activity (16.5 vs. 6.8 hours, p<0.001), out-of-bed (17.6 vs. 8.9 hours, p<0.001), and ambulation (32.4 vs. 25.4 hours, p=0.04) saw statistically significant improvements by 1-3 months post-ERATS implementation compared to pre-ERATS. Time to Foley removal improved by 4-6 months post-ERATS (19.5 vs. 18.2 hours, p=0.003). Outcome measures, including the 30-day readmission rate and emergency department visits, steadily decreased post-ERATS. By 7-9 months post-ERATS, both minor (18.2% vs. 7.9%, p=0.009) and major (13.6% vs. 4.4%, p=0.007) adverse events demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Length of stay trended towards improvement from 6.2 days pre-ERATS to 4.8 days by 7-9 months post-ERATS (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: The adoption of ERATS led to improvements in multiple process-of-care measures, which may collectively and gradually achieve optimization of clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of anatomical resection (AR) in lung metastasectomy (LM) of colorectal cancer (CRC) harboring KRAS mutations SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:: KRAS mutations are related to high aggressiveness in the lung metastasis of CRC. It is unknown whether AR can lead to better outcomes than can non-AR (NAR) in KRAS patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 574 consecutive patients who underwent a LM for CRC. We focused on patients exhibiting 1 lung metastasis who underwent an AR (segmentectomy) or an NAR (wedge) and for whom the KRAS mutational status was known. Overall survival (OS) and time to pulmonary recurrence (TTPR) were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 168 patients, of whom 95 (56.5%) harbored KRAS mutations. An AR was performed in 74 patients (44%). The type of resection did not impact the median OS in wild-type (WT) patients (P = 0.67) but was significantly better following AR in KRAS patients (101 vs 45 months, P = 0.02) according to the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR): 6.524; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.312-18.405; P < 0.0001). TTPR was not affected by the type of resection in WT patients (P = 0.32) but was significantly better for AR in KRAS patients (50 vs 15 months, P = 0.01) in the multivariate analysis (HR: 5.273; 95% CI, 1.731-16.064; P = 0.003). The resection-margin recurrence rate was significantly higher for NAR in KRAS patients (4.8% vs 54.2%, P = 0.001) but not in WT patients (P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: AR seems to improve both the OS and TTPR in LM of CRC harboring KRAS mutations.
