Prospective surveillance for cardiac adverse events in healthy adults receiving modified vaccinia Ankara vaccines: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Vaccinia-associated myo/pericarditis was observed during the US smallpox vaccination (DryVax) campaign initiated in 2002. A highly-attenuated vaccinia strain, modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) has been evaluated in clinical trials as a safer alternative to DryVax and as a vector for recombinant vaccines. Due to the lack of prospectively collected cardiac safety data, the US Food and Drug Administration required cardiac screening and surveillance in all clinical trials of MVA since 2004. Here, we report cardiac safety surveillance from 6 phase I trials of MVA vaccines. METHODS: Four clinical research organizations contributed cardiac safety data using common surveillance methods in trials administering MVA or recombinant MVA vaccines to healthy participants. 'Routine cardiac investigations' (ECGs and cardiac enzymes obtained 2 weeks after injections of MVA or MVA-HIV recombinants, or placebo-controls), and 'Symptom-driven cardiac investigations' are reported. The outcome measure is the number of participants who met the CDC-case definition for vaccinia-related myo/pericarditis or who experienced cardiac adverse events from an MVA vaccine. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five study participants had post-vaccination safety data analyzed, 382 received at least one MVA-containing vaccine and 43 received placebo; 717 routine ECGs and 930 cardiac troponin assays were performed. Forty-five MVA recipients (12%) had additional cardiac testing performed; 22 for cardiac symptoms, 19 for ECG/laboratory changes, and 4 for cardiac symptoms with an ECG/laboratory change. No participant had evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic myo/pericarditis meeting the CDC-case definition and judged to be related to an MVA vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective surveillance of MVA recipients for myo/pericarditis did not detect cardiac adverse reactions in 382 study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00082446 NCT003766090 NCT00252148 NCT00083603 NCT00301184 NCT00428337.

Lessons from a multisite international trial in the Caribbean and South America of an HIV-1 Canarypox vaccine (ALVAC-HIV vCP1452) with or without boosting with MN rgp120.

BACKGROUND: The first multicenter, international National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-sponsored HIV vaccine trial took place in Brazil, Haiti, Peru and Trinidad. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a clade B-derived, live canarypox HIV vaccine, vCP1452. vCP1452 was administered alone or with a heterologous boost of MN rgp120 glycoprotein. The trial was pivotal in deciding whether these vaccines advanced to phase 3 efficacy trials. METHODS: Forty seronegative volunteers per site were randomized to ALVAC alone, ALVAC plus MN rgp120, or placebo in a 0, 1, 3, and 6 month schedule. Immunogenicity was assayed by chromium-release cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses; interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays (ELISpot); lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA); neutralization; and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). RESULTS: Enrollment and follow-up were excellent. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Neutralizing antibody to the laboratory-adapted MN strain was detected. Cellular immune responses, as measured by CTL, ELISpot, and LPA, did not differ between vaccines and placebos. CONCLUSIONS: The observation of disappointing immunogenicity in this and a parallel domestic study has informed future vaccine development. Equally important, challenges to doing an integrated trial across countries, cultures, languages, and differing at-risk populations were overcome. The identification of specific safety, ethical, logistic, and immunological issues in this trial established the foundation for current larger international studies.

Outbreaks of Gastrointestinal Diseases on Cruise Ships: Lessons from Three Decades of Progress.

Dramatic improvements in sanitary engineering and, especially, operational procedures aboard cruise ships began in the mid-1970s after several large outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vessel Sanitation Program, working with the cruise industry, conducts ship inspections, provides public access to ship sanitation scores, and reports outbreak investigations. The significant increase in median ship sanitation scores over the past decade has been concomitant with a reduction in outbreak frequency to 3.7 per 1000 cruises. Most outbreaks of the past decade were linked to noroviruses (Norwalk-like viruses), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, or the residual "unknown" causes. Although norovirus outbreaks may begin as foodborne or waterborne disease, easy person-to-person transmission occurs through fecal- or vomitus-splattered surfaces, other items, clothing, and especially, hands. Control of person-to-person spread of illness among crew and passengers becomes the major objective. Rigorous handwashing, environmental disinfection, and other food service job-related restrictions are required to prevent multiple outbreaks on the same ship. Vigilance by public health and industry officials has prevented many thousands of illnesses and some associated deaths. Clinicians providing pretravel health advice and post-travel diagnoses and care can benefit from and contribute to epidemiologic investigations and thereby enhance the health of cruise passengers individually and collectively.