Diabetes mellitus and obesity among South Asians with ischemic stroke across three countries.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus and central obesity are more common among South Asian populations than among White British people. This study explores the differences in diabetes and obesity in South Asians with stroke living in the United Kingdom, India, and Qatar compared with White British stroke patients. METHODS: The study included the UK, Indian, and Qatari arms of the ongoing large Bio-Repository of DNA in Stroke (BRAINS) international prospective hospital-based study for South Asian stroke. BRAINS includes 4580 South Asian and White British recruits from UK, Indian, and Qatar sites with first-ever ischemic stroke. RESULTS: The study population comprises 1751 White British (WB) UK residents, 1165 British South Asians (BSA), 1096 South Asians in India (ISA), and 568 South Asians in Qatar (QSA). ISA, BSA, and QSA South Asians suffered from higher prevalence of diabetes compared with WB by 14.5% (ISA: 95% confidence interval (CI) = 18.6-33.0, p < 0.001), 31.7% (BSA: 95% CI = 35.1-50.2, p < 0.001), and 32.7% (QSA: 95% CI = 28.1-37.3, p < 0.001), respectively. Although WB had the highest prevalence of body mass index (BMI) above 27 kg/m2 compared with South Asian patients (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001), South Asian patients had a higher waist circumference than WB (94.8 cm vs 90.8 cm, p < 0.001). Adjusting for traditional stroke risk factors, ISA, BSA, and QSA continued to display an increased risk of diabetes compared with WB by 3.28 (95% CI: 2.53-4.25, p < 0.001), 3.61 (95% CI: 2.90-4.51, p < 0.001), and 5.24 (95% CI: 3.93-7.00, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: South Asian ischemic stroke patients living in Britain and Qatar have a near 3.5-fold risk of diabetes compared with White British stroke patients. Their body composition may partly help explain that increased risk. These findings have important implications for public health policymakers in nations with large South Asian populations.

Atrial fibrillation in UK South Asian hospitalized ischemic stroke patients: The BRAINS study.

INTRODUCTION: South Asian diaspora comprise one of the largest ethnic minority groups in the world yet data about atrial fibrillation (AF) in this demographic is understudied. Our aim is to identify differences in AF prevalence and treatment between South Asians and white British stroke patients. METHOD: The UK arm of a prospective ongoing large international repository on stroke was analysed. Ethnic differences in AF prevalence and management in those with ischemic stroke were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 3515 individuals recruited with ischemic stroke, 1482 (men: 972, women: 510) were South Asian and 2033 (men:1141, women:892) of white British ethnicity. AF was present in 462 white British and 193 South Asians stroke patients, with South Asians displaying a lower prevalence of AF (South Asians: 13.0% vs white British 22.7%, P<0.001). Despite adjustment for traditional AF risk factors, South Asians had a significantly lower OR of AF compared to white British stroke patients (OR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.33:0.49, P<0.001). Among confirmed AF cases, 31.8% of South Asians and 41.4% of white British were untreated at admission (P = 0.02). Antiplatelet treatment was significantly higher among South Asians at both admission (South Asian: 47.4% vs. white British: 29.9%, P<0.001) and discharge (South Asian: 49.5% vs. white British: 34.7%, P = 0.001), although anticoagulation treatment was similar across both ethnic groups at admission (South Asian: 28.5% vs white British: 28.1%, P = 0.93), and discharge (South Asian: 45.1% vs white British: 43.1%, P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Stroke patients of South Asian descent are at significantly lower risk of AF but more likely to be on antiplatelet treatment compared to their white British counterparts.

Ischaemic stroke in South Asians: The BRAINS study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies on stroke in South Asian populations are sparse. The aim of this study was to compare differences in age of onset of ischaemic stroke in South Asian patients living in the United Kingdom and South Asian patients living in India versus White British stroke patients. METHODS: We studied the UK and Indian arms of the ongoing BRAINS study, an international prospective hospital-based study of South Asian stroke patients. The BRAINS study includes 4038 South Asian and White British patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke, recruited from sites in the United Kingdom and India. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 1126 were South Asians living in India (ISA), while 1176 were British South Asian (BSA) and 1736 were White British (WB) UK residents. Patients in the ISA and BSA groups experienced stroke 19.5 years and 7.2 years earlier than their WB counterparts, respectively (mean [interquartile range] age: BSA 64.3 [22] years vs. ISA 52.0 [18] years vs. WB 71.5 [19] years; p < 0.001). Patients in the BSA group had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia than those in the ISA and WB groups. After adjustment for traditional stroke risk factors, an earlier age of stroke onset of 18.9 years (p < 0.001) and 8.9 years (p < 0.001) was still observed in the ISA and BSA groups, respectively. In multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, ethnicity accounted for 24.7% of the variance in early age onset. CONCLUSION: Patients in the BSA and ISA groups experienced ischaemic stroke approximately 9 and 19 years earlier, respectively, than their WB counterparts. Ethnicity is an independent predictor of early age of stroke onset. Our study has considerable implications for public health policymakers in countries with sizable South Asian populations.

Influence of guidelines on CPR decisions: an audit of clerking proforma.

We audited documentation rates and implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions for patients admitted under the Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, as new guidelines and a proforma were introduced. For the first audit, data were collected from 75 departmental discharges. Following introduction of a proforma, six point prevalence audits were performed of all elderly care inpatients. Consultant documentation improved from 27/75 (36%) to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 133/140 (95%), 96/119 (81%), 148/157 (94%) and 167/169 (98%) in audits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively. The percentages of decisions that were Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) were 64% 72%, 45%, 68% and 62% in audits 3 to 7 respectively. For audit 5 our guidelines required discussion with patient before making a DNAR order, whereas the guidelines applicable for the other audits did not stipulate discussion. The fall in documentation rates and proportion of CPR decisions that were DNAR in audit 5 were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, diagnosis, cognitive function or disability between patients in those audits (3-7) when these parameters were recorded. Introducing a proforma significantly improved CPR decision documentation. Obligatory discussion with a patient before issuing a DNAR order was associated with a fall in documentation of decisions.

The influence of new guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions. Five cycles of audit of a clerk proforma which included a resuscitation decision.

Current guidelines advise discussion with patients before issuing a 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) order. We report five audit cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) documentation after introducing a proforma, the last cycle following the latest guidelines. In first audit data were collected from 75 patient discharges. CPR decisions were documented in 27 (36%). Four subsequent point prevalence audits carried out on all inpatients following proforma introduction showed documentation improved to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 131/140 (94%) and 102/119 (86%) in cycles two, three, four and five, respectively. The last three audits also revealed that consultants consistently made more DNAR orders than trainee doctors. However, following the introduction of the latest guidelines the proportion of patients in whom a decision was made, and the percentage of those decisions that were DNAR, fell.