Differences in referral to a chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension center following acute pulmonary embolism: a locoregional experience.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a treatable complication of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Identification of factors that impact referral to a comprehensive CTEPH center may improve disease awareness and patient outcomes. We conducted a study of patients with acute PE. Cases were identified through a natural language processing algorithm. ICD coding was used to assess clinical documentation for dyspnea or CTEPH placed at least 90 days after their acute PE diagnosis. We analyzed characteristics of patients who were referred vs. not referred, as well as referral patterns for "at risk" patients. 2454 patients with acute PE were identified, of which 4.9% (120/2454) were referred for CTEPH evaluation. Patients who were not referred were older (61 vs. 54 years, p < 0.001), had higher rates of cancer (28% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and lived further from the referral center (9.1 miles vs. 6.7 miles, p = 0.03). Of 175 patients identified as "at risk," 12% (21/175) were referred. In the 'at risk' cohort, distance from referral center among referred and not referred was significant (5.7 miles vs. 8.8 miles, p = 0.04). There were low rates of referral to CTEPH center in post-PE patients, and in patients with symptoms who may be at higher risk of CTEPH. Age, co-morbid conditions, distance from comprehensive center, and presence of a primary care provider contribute to differences in referral to a comprehensive CTEPH center. Clinician education about CTEPH is important to ensure optimal care to patients with or at risk for chronic complications of acute PE.

Treatment of newly diagnosed sarcoid-associated pulmonary hypertension with ambrisentan and tadalafil combination therapy.

Sarcoid Associated Pulmonary Hypertension (SAPH) is a common complication of sarcoidosis and is associated with poor prognosis. SAPH can be due to multiple synergistic mechanisms and current therapeutic strategies treat systemic sarcoidosis and pulmonary hypertension separately. Several studies have been performed to develop an effective therapy for SAPH but have been met with mixed results. The AMBITION trial successfully treated incident patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with the upfront combination of ambrisentan and tadalafil; however combination therapy has not yet been studied in patients with SAPH. Here we report a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed SAPH who were treated with upfront combination therapy per the AMBITION study protocol. We report three subjects with newly diagnosed SAPH who were treated with combination ambrisentan and tadalafil. Baseline hemodynamics were compared with those from surveillance right heart catheterization while on therapy. Mean follow up period was 17 months. Each subject demonstrated clinical and hemodynamic improvement with combination therapy. This series is the first to evaluate upfront combination ambrisentan and tadalafil therapy for treatment of newly diagnosed SAPH. Despite the impressive clinical and hemodynamic improvement, the study is limited by its small size and retrospective nature. While these initial results are promising, further work is needed to fully evaluate this regimen for treatment of SAPH. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2020; 37 (2): 234-238).

Single-center experience of antifungal prophylaxis for coccidioidomycosis in heart transplant recipients within an endemic area.

In endemic regions, coccidioidomycosis causes substantial morbidity and mortality for patients receiving solid organ transplants. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of antifungal coccidioidal prophylaxis in heart transplant (HT) recipients. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of all patients who received HTs between October 19, 2005, and December 13, 2014. We collected information regarding antifungal regimens and determined whether patients subsequently developed infections. Our 174-person cohort all received antifungal prophylaxis for at least 6 months (mean follow-up, 53.8 months). One proven and one probable coccidioidal infection (each, 0.6%) occurred during the study period. The incidence of coccidioidomycosis was 0.6% at 1 year and 2.3% at 5 years. No cases of proven coccidioidomycosis occurred within 2 years after transplantation. No patients developed disseminated disease, and no sentinel events were attributed to coccidioidomycosis. Both fluconazole and voriconazole were well tolerated. In the absence of intolerance or contraindication, we suggest continuing a universal antifungal prophylactic regimen with fluconazole for at least 6-12 months in HT recipients residing in a coccidioidomycosis-endemic area.