Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurooncol ; 161(2): 317-327, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525165

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated meningioma patients' longer-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following diagnosis and treatment, particularly in those with incidental, actively monitored tumours. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional study was completed. Adult patients with surgically managed or actively monitored meningioma with more than five years of follow-up were included. The patient-reported outcome measures RAND SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 were used to evaluate HRQoL. HRQoL scores were compared to normative population data. Outcome determinants were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: 243 patient responses were analyzed, and the mean time from diagnosis was 9.8 years (range 5.0-40.3 years). Clinically relevant, statistically significant HRQoL impairments were identified across several SF-36 and QLQ-C30 domains. Increasing education level (ß = 2.9, 95% CI 0.9 to 4.9), P = .004), employment (ß = 7.7, 95% CI 2.2 to 13.1, P = .006) and absence of postoperative complications (ß=-6.7, 95% CI -13.2 to (-)0.3, P = .041) were associated with a better QLQ-C30 summary score. Other tumour and treatment variables were not. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the longer-term disease burden of patients with meningioma nearly one decade after diagnosis or surgery. Patients with actively monitored meningioma have similar HRQoL to operated meningioma patients. Healthcare professionals should be mindful of HRQoL impairments and direct patients to sources of support as needed.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Adult , Humans , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Meningioma/surgery , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Cohort Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Neurooncol ; 153(2): 239-249, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886110

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radiation induced meningioma (RIM) incidence is increasing in line with improved childhood cancer survival. No optimal management strategy consensus exists. This study aimed to delineate meningioma growth rates from tumor discovery and correlate with clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with a RIM, managed at a specialist tertiary neuroscience center (2007-2019). Tumor volume was measured from diagnosis and at subsequent interval scans. Meningioma growth rate was determined using a linear mixed-effects model. Clinical outcomes were correlated with growth rates accounting for imaging and clinical prognostic factors. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (110 meningiomas) were included. Median duration of follow-up was 74 months (interquartile range [IQR], 41-102 months). Mean radiation dose was 41 Gy (standard deviation [SD] = 14.9) with a latency period of 34.4 years (SD = 13.7). Median absolute growth rate was 0.62 cm3/year and the median relative growth rate was 72%/year. Forty meningiomas (between 27 patients) underwent surgical intervention after a median follow-up duration of 4 months (IQR 2-35). Operated RIMs were clinically aggressive, likely to be WHO grade 2 at first resection (43.6%) and to progress after surgery (41%). Median time to progression was 28 months (IQR 13-60.5). A larger meningioma at discovery was associated with growth (HR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.5], P = 0.039) but not progression after surgery (HR 2.2 [95% CI 0.7-6.6], P = 0.181). Twenty-seven (50%) patients had multiple meningiomas by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: RIMs exhibit high absolute and relative growth rates after discovery. Surgery is recommended for symptomatic or rapidly growing meningiomas only. Recurrence risk after surgery is high.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/etiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Prim Dent Care ; 16(2): 55-8, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19366520

ABSTRACT

The following case reports describe the clinical features, diagnosis and management of two patients who presented to their general dental practitioner with a complaint of orofacial paraesthesia. After appropriate investigations, both patients were diagnosed as having benign intracranial tumours and were managed by a neurosurgeon. These cases illustrate the important role the general dental practitioner has in the early recognition of potentially life-threatening conditions.


Subject(s)
Facial Nerve Diseases/etiology , Meningioma/complications , Neurilemmoma/complications , Paresthesia/etiology , Skull Base Neoplasms/complications , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...