Initial Feeding Method, WIC-Provided Lactation Support, and Breastfeeding Duration at an Urban Pediatric Primary Care Practice.

Breastfeeding (BF) is associated with improved maternal and infant health outcomes. However, underserved populations have limited access to lactation support. Our urban pediatric primary care practice partnered with WIC to integrate a BF peer counselor (BFPC) into newborn visits. To study the association of BF duration with (1) BFPC integration, (2) initial infant feeding methods (IFM). This is a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving BFPC support matched with those that did not based on race, ethnicity, and insurance. IFM were compared using chi-square. BF duration was compared using a t-test. These variables were compared across IFM using ANOVA. A cohort of 111 infant-mother dyads received BFPC support and 222 dyads did not (7/09/2019-4/25/2022). There was no significant difference in feeding methods between these groups. Compared to infants whose IFM was exclusive BF, fewer infants who initially used formula or both formula and breastmilk were exclusively BF at 2-month (55.8%, 8.2%, 10.9%), 4-month (54.8%, 6.3%, 14.5%), and 6-month visits (54.8%, 4.3%, 14.1%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant association between IFM and duration of any and exclusive BF (Formula only: 1 week; BF and Formula: 3 weeks; Exclusive BF: 14 weeks; p < 0.001). A significant association was found between IFM and duration of BF. Early formula introduction was negatively associated with BF duration. The prenatal period may therefore be optimal for initiating BF support. Although there was no association between BFPC and BF duration, additional benefits of this intervention should be explored.

The Use of Telemedicine for Screening and Addressing Social Needs in a Primary Care Pediatric Population in Brooklyn, New York.

The objective of this study was to analyze temporal changes in social needs (SN), comparing those who received routine annual in-person care to those receiving SN screenings through a combination of tele-social care and in-person care biannually. Our prospective cohort study used a convenience sample of patients from primary care practices. Baseline data were collected from April 2019 to March 2020. The intervention group (n = 336) received SN screening and referral telephone outreach from June 2020 to August 2021. The control group (n = 2890) was screened, in person, during routine visits at baseline and summer 2021. We used a repeated-measures logistic regression with general estimating equations to assess incremental change in individual SN for the intervention group. Food, housing, legal and benefit needs increased and peaked at the beginning of the pandemic and decreased after interventions (P < 0.001). There was a 32% decrease in the odds of food insecurity for those in the intervention group compared to the control group (adjusted OR 0.668, 95% confidence interval 0.444-1.004, P = 0.052), and a 75% decrease in the odds of housing insecurity (adjusted OR 0.247, 95% confidence interval 0.150-0.505, P < 0.001). During COVID-19, there was an increase in SN followed by a decrease after interventions were offered. Those who completed tele-social care showed greater improvements in social needs than those in routine care, with the greatest improvements in food and housing needs.

Identifying Nutritional Insecurity Among Families in an Urban Pediatric Practice.

This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of and concordance between self-reported food scarcity and nutritional insecurity in an urban pediatric practice.

Social Determinants of Health and Pediatric Mental Health Before and During COVID-19 in New York City Primary Care Pediatrics.

In March 2020, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York City instituted a shelter-in-place order, dramatically affecting the area's social and economic landscape. Pediatric primary care practices universally screen for social determinants of health (SDOH) and mental health (MH) needs, providing an opportunity to assess changes in the population's needs during COVID-19. To assess changes in SDOH and MH needs of pediatric families before and during COVID-19, the authors conducted a prospective cohort study of patients seen in the hospital's pediatric primary care practices. Baseline data were collected during well visits from March 1, 2019 to March 1, 2020, and included the following outcome measures: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) score >0, PHQ9 scores ≥5, pediatric symptom checklist (PSC17) scores ≥15, and SDOH needs. Follow-up pandemic data were collected from June to August 2020. A total of 423 patients (215 [51%] female, 279 [66%] Hispanic, and 248 [59%] primary English speakers) were enrolled in the study. The following SDOH needs significantly increased during COVID-19: food (17%-32%; P < 0.001), legal (19%-30%; P = 0.003), public benefits (4%-13.8%; P < 0.001), and housing (17.2%-26%; P = 0.002). There was no significant change in MH screening results during COVID-19 compared with baseline: positive PHQ2 depression screen (27.9% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.39), positive PHQ9 depression screen (45.5% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.32), or positive PSC17 measuring emotional and behavioral concerns (4.9% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.13). During COVID-19, patients with food, housing, or legal needs had a significantly higher likelihood of having emotional or behavioral difficulties (P < 0.01). Further research is needed to evaluate outcomes in the following months.

Pediatric primary care and subspecialist providers' comfort, attitudes and practices screening and referring for social determinants of health.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and management of poverty-related disorders is a recommended pediatric practice; however, little is known about variations of practice between pediatric primary care physicians and subspecialists. The objectives of this study were to assess (1) provider perceptions and attitudes toward caring for low-income children in an urban academic medical center, and (2) variations between primary care physicians and subspecialists in social and financial needs screening and referral practices for low-income children. DESIGN/METHODS: Primary care providers (pediatric and family medicine) and subspecialists providing direct patient care in an urban academic medical center (response rate = 24 %, n = 85/356) completed a 24-item survey (adapted with permission from the AAP Periodic Survey of Fellows No.90) assessing feasibility and comfort screening and addressing social and financial needs, rates of screening for financial hardship, and referrals to local resources. Chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: Among respondents, 88 % (75/85) reported comfort caring for low-income children, while 28 % (24/85) reported comfort inquiring about social and financial needs and 34 % (29/85) referring to community resources. Primary care providers more commonly than subspecialists screened for childcare (80 % vs. 59 %, p = 0.04), parental: employment (84 % vs. 59 %, p = 0.01), education (40 % vs. 17 %, p = 0.02) and mental health (86 % vs. 46 %, p = 0.0001), and less commonly screened for transportation (47 % vs. 73 %, p = 0.01). Primary care providers more commonly referred for public health insurance (74 % vs. 39 %, p = 0.001), public food assistance (30 % vs. 12 %, p = 0.04), and adult mental health services (65 % vs. 44 %, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In an urban academic institution serving a population with high poverty rates, pediatric providers feel comfortable providing medical care for low-income children but lack comfort screening and addressing SDH. Though most feel it is their job to refer to resources, less than half felt it was feasible to screen for or address financial needs. Pediatric primary care providers report higher rates of screening and referring than subspecialists. Understanding variations in practice and perceptions among primary care providers and subspecialists may aid in creating interventions to increase screening and referral rates.

Associations Between Participation in After-School Activities, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Severity, and School Functioning.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between after-school activity (ASA) participation, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) severity, and school functioning among children with ADHD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health on ADHD severity, ASAs and 2 domains of school functioning among children with ADHD: missed days from school and calls home from school. RESULTS: Of 4,049 children with ADHD (weighted N = 5,010,662), 71.8% participated in at least 1 ASA. In multivariable regression analyses, ASA participation was associated with lower odds of moderate-to-severe ADHD [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.85] and lower odds of missed school days (aOR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.41-0.74). We did not find significant associations with calls home from school (aOR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.59-1.07). CONCLUSION: After-school activity participation is associated with decreased ADHD severity and reduced school absenteeism. Efforts to optimize ADHD outcomes should consider engaging children and adolescents in ASAs.

Three-Tiered Advocacy: Using a Longitudinal Curriculum to Teach Pediatric Residents Advocacy on an Individual, Community, and Legislative Level.

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians play a critical role as health advocates. Teaching residents to advocate for their patients on an individual, community, and legislative level is a priority for residency training programs. This study examined the effects of a longitudinal curriculum teaching 3-tiered advocacy on pediatric residents' attitudes, knowledge, and practice. METHODS: This was a prospective pre- and postintervention study using an anonymous survey of pediatric residents (N = 78) in an urban academic children's hospital. The survey assessed advocacy on an individual level through comfort and experience in discussing social determinants of health (SDH), on a community level through comfort and practice referring patients to community resources, and on a legislative level through comfort and practice with legislative advocacy. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Postimplementation, pediatric residents reported the curriculum changed their clinical practice (66%), encouraged them to take a more in-depth social history (46%), and helped them guide patients to more community resources (38%). Comfort in discussing SDH with patients in the ambulatory clinic increased (27% vs 76%; P = .001). Reported frequency in inquiring about SDH significantly improved in the following areas: income (39% vs 60%; P = .025), education (71% vs 93%; P = .008), and legal issues (13% vs 26%; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the residents reported that the curriculum changed their clinical practice. Residents reported knowledge and comfort with advocating for their patients on an individual level improved. However, there was no significant difference on the community or legislative level. This curriculum raised awareness and armed residents with practical skills to be health advocates on an individual level. Further research is needed to explore effective means of creating 3-tiered advocates.

The Impact of a Clinical Asthma Pathway on Resident Education.

Clinical pathways for asthma management decrease hospital cost and length of stay; however little is known about the educational impact of pathways on residents. Pediatric residents at a children's hospital (N = 114) were invited to complete a 22-item computerized, anonymous survey 6 months before and 6 months after asthma pathway implementation. The survey assessed pathway use and residents (1) pathway knowledge, (2) attitudes and experiences with managing asthma, and (3) perceived educational benefits. Mean pathway knowledge score increased from the case before to the case after implementation [1.5 ± 1.0 versus 2.6 ± 1.3, p < 0.001], as did high preparedness to manage asthma [61% versus 91%, p < 0.001] and electronic order set use [28% versus 80%, p < 0.001]. The top three educational benefits of the pathway endorsed by residents were application of evidence-based medicine (57%), ability to assess exacerbations (52%), and skill at communicating respiratory status (47%). After implementation, residents' knowledge and preparedness to manage asthma improved as well as many endorsed educational benefits.