ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although surgical intervention is the favorable treatment modality for perforated peptic ulcer, nonsurgical treatment is another option. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of conservative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2014, 403 patients were admitted to our hospital for perforated peptic ulcer, and 383 patients underwent surgery, whereas 20 were allocated to conservative treatment. The results of nonsurgical intervention in these patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate of conservative treatment was 40%. Eleven patients remained hospitalized less than 2 weeks; among them, patients with a high (≥IV) American Society of Anesthesiologists class at admission had higher mortality than those with a low (Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/methods
, Duodenal Ulcer/complications
, Peptic Ulcer Perforation/therapy
, Adult
, Aged
, Aged, 80 and over
, Duodenal Ulcer/diagnosis
, Duodenal Ulcer/therapy
, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
, Female
, Humans
, Length of Stay/trends
, Male
, Middle Aged
, Peptic Ulcer Perforation/diagnosis
, Peptic Ulcer Perforation/etiology
, Radiography, Abdominal
, Retrospective Studies
, Treatment Outcome
