Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Chem Theory Comput ; 13(5): 1874-1882, 2017 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28437100

ABSTRACT

AMBER/GLYCAM and CHARMM are popular force fields for simulations of amino acids and sugars. Here we report excessively attractive amino acid-sugar interactions in both force fields, and corrections to nonbonded interactions that match experimental osmotic pressures of mixed aqueous solutions of diglycine and sucrose. The modified parameters also improve the ΔGtrans of diglycine from water to aqueous sucrose and, with AMBERff99SB/GLYCAM06, eliminate a caging effect seen in previous simulations of the protein ubiquitin with glucose.


Subject(s)
Glucose/chemistry , Glycylglycine/chemistry , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Sucrose/chemistry , Ubiquitin/chemistry , Osmotic Pressure , Solutions , Water/chemistry
3.
J Chem Theory Comput ; 13(4): 1812-1826, 2017 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28296391

ABSTRACT

There is a small, but growing, body of literature describing the use of osmotic coefficient measurements to validate and reparametrize simulation force fields. Here we have investigated the ability of five very commonly used force field and water model combinations to reproduce the osmotic coefficients of seven neutral amino acids and five small molecules. The force fields tested include AMBER ff99SB-ILDN, CHARMM36, GROMOS54a7, and OPLS-AA, with the first of these tested in conjunction with the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew water models. In general, for both the amino acids and the small molecules, the tested force fields produce computed osmotic coefficients that are lower than experiment; this is indicative of excessively favorable solute-solute interactions. The sole exception to this general trend is provided by GROMOS54a7 when applied to amino acids: in this case, the computed osmotic coefficients are consistently too high. Importantly, we show that all of the force fields tested can be made to accurately reproduce the experimental osmotic coefficients of the amino acids when minor modifications-some previously reported by others and some that are new to this study-are made to the van der Waals interactions of the charged terminal groups. Special care is required, however, when simulating Proline with a number of the force fields, and a hydroxyl-group specific modification is required in order to correct Serine and Threonine when simulated with AMBER ff99SB-ILDN. Interestingly, an alternative parametrization of the van der Waals interactions in the latter force field, proposed by the Nerenberg and Head-Gordon groups, is shown to immediately produce osmotic coefficients that are in excellent agreement with experiment. Overall, this study reinforces the idea that osmotic coefficient measurements can be used to identify general shortcomings in commonly used force fields' descriptions of solute-solute interactions and further demonstrates that modifications to van der Waals parameters provide a simple route to optimizing agreement with experiment.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids/chemistry , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Small Molecule Libraries/chemistry , Osmotic Pressure
4.
J Phys Chem B ; 120(33): 8217-29, 2016 08 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27052117

ABSTRACT

Recent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins have suggested that common force fields overestimate the strength of amino acid interactions in aqueous solution. In an attempt to determine the causes of these effects, we have measured the osmotic coefficients of a number of amino acids using the AMBER ff99SB-ILDN force field with two popular water models, and compared the results with available experimental data. With TIP4P-Ew water, interactions between aliphatic residues agree well with experiment, but interactions of the polar residues serine and threonine are found to be excessively attractive. For all tested amino acids, the osmotic coefficients are lower when the TIP3P water model is used. Additional simulations performed on charged amino acids indicate that the osmotic coefficients are strongly dependent on the parameters assigned to the salt ions, with a reparameterization of the sodium/carboxylate interaction reported by the Aksimentiev group significantly improving description of the osmotic coefficient for glutamate. For five neutral amino acids, we also demonstrate a decrease in solute-solute attractions using the recently reported TIP4P-D water model and using the KBFF force field. Finally, we show that for four two-residue peptides improved agreement with experiment can be achieved by rederiving the partial charges for each peptide.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids/chemistry , Peptides/chemistry , Water/chemistry , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Osmotic Pressure , Static Electricity , Thermodynamics
5.
J Chem Theory Comput ; 12(4): 1401-7, 2016 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967542

ABSTRACT

GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 are successful force fields for modeling carbohydrates. To correct recently identified deficiencies with both force fields, we adjusted intersolute nonbonded parameters to reproduce the experimental osmotic coefficient of glucose at 1 M. The modified parameters improve behavior of glucose and sucrose up to 4 M and improve modeling of a dextran 55-mer. While the modified parameters may not be applicable to all carbohydrates, they highlight the use of osmotic simulations to optimize force fields.


Subject(s)
Carbohydrates/chemistry , Computer Simulation , Dextrans/chemistry , Glucose/chemistry , Models, Chemical , Models, Molecular , Osmosis , Osmotic Pressure , Software , Sucrose/chemistry , Thermodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...