Expression and regulation of the estrogen receptors in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells.

The aim of this study was to identify the expression, cellular localization and regulation of classic estrogen receptors ERα and ERß, ER-α36 isoform and GPER in the androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line PC-3. In addition, we evaluated the relative contribution of these receptors to the activation of the ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases) signaling pathway. These four estrogen receptors were detected by Western blot assays and were shown by immunofluorescence assays to localize preferentially in extranuclear regions of PC-3 cells. In addition, treatment with 17ß-estradiol (E2) (1 µM) for 24 h led to down-regulation of the classic estrogen receptors, whereas E2 at physiological concentration (0.1 nM) for 24h tended to increase the levels of ERα and ERß. Furthermore, the ERα-selective agonist PPT selectively increased the expression of ERß and the ERß-selective agonist DPN increased ERα levels. None of these treatments affected expression of the ER-α36 isoform. The unusual cytoplasmic localization of the classic estrogen receptors in these cells differs from the nuclear localization in the majority of estrogen target cells and suggests that rapid signaling pathways may be preferentially activated. In fact, treatment with selective agonists of ERα, ERß and GPER induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation that was blocked by the respective antagonists. On the other hand, activation of ERK1/2 induced by E2 may involve additional mechanisms because it was not blocked by the three antagonists. Taken together, the results indicate that there is a crosstalk between ERα and ERß to regulate the expression of each other, and suggest the involvement of other receptors, such as ER-α36, in the rapid ERK1/2 activation by E2. The identification of new isoforms of ERs, regulation of the receptors and signaling pathways is important to develop new therapeutic strategies for the castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Relaxin affects cell organization and early and late stages of spermatogenesis in a coculture of rat testicular cells.

Relaxin and its receptor RXFP1 are co-expressed in Sertoli cells, and relaxin can stimulate proliferation of Sertoli cells. In this study, we investigated a role of relaxin in spermatogenesis, using a short-term culture of testicular cells of the rat that allowed differentiation of spermatogonia to spermatids. Sertoli, germ, and peritubular myoid cells were the predominant cell types in the culture. Sertoli and germ cells expressed RXFP1. Cultures were incubated without (control) or with 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or 100 ng/mL H2 relaxin (RLN) for 2 days. Cell organization, number, and differentiation were analyzed after 2 (D2), 5 (D5) or 8 (D8) days of culturing. Although the proportion of germ cells decayed from D2 to D5, the relative contribution of HC, 1C, 2C, and 4C germ cell populations remained constant in the control group during the whole culture. RLN did not affect the proportion of germ cell populations compared with control, but increased gene and/or protein expression of the undifferentiated and differentiated spermatogonia markers PLZF and c-KIT, and of the post-meiotic marker Odf2 in D5. RLN favored organization of cells in tubule-like structures, the arrangement of myoid cells around the tubules, arrangement of c-KIT-positive spermatogonia at the basal region of the tubules, and expression of the cell junction protein ß-catenin close to the plasma membrane region. Knockdown of relaxin with small interfering RNA (siRNA) reduced expression of ß-catenin at the cell junctions, and shifted its expression to the nucleus. We propose that relaxin may affect spermatogenesis by modulating spermatogonial self renewal and favoring cell contact.

Effects of the oestrogen receptor antagonist Fulvestrant on expression of genes that affect organization of the epididymal epithelium.

The role of oestrogens in epididymal function is still unclear. Knockout of the oestrogen receptor ESR1 (Esr1(-/-) ) or treatment with the anti-oestrogen Fulvestrant affect epididymal milieu and sperm motility. We investigated the effect of in vivo treatment of rats with Fulvestrant on: (i) expression of genes that may be important for the architecture and function of the epididymal epithelium: prominins 1 and 2, metalloproteinase 7, claudin 7, beta-catenin and cadherin 13, and (ii) levels of oestradiol and testosterone, and expression of oestrogen and androgen receptors, in the initial segment (IS), caput, corpus and cauda epididymis. Fulvestrant (i) reduced gene expression of prominin 1 (variant 1) in the caput, reduced prominin 1 protein content in the caput epididymis and in the efferent ductules, and increased the localization of prominin 1 in microvilli of the caput and corpus; (ii) reduced gene expression of prominin 2 in the corpus and cauda epididymis; (iii) increased the metalloproteinase 7 content in the apical region of principal cells from IS/caput; (iv) reduced in the corpus epididymis, but increased in the efferent ductules, the cadherin 13 mRNA level; (v) reduced testosterone but increased oestradiol levels in the corpus and cauda; (vi) increased the androgen receptor protein content in all regions of the epididymis, and the oestrogen receptor GPER in the corpus and cauda epididymis. In conclusion, treatment with Fulvestrant induced regional-specific changes in hormonal and steroid receptor content, and affected expression of proteins important for epithelial organization and absorption/secretion. The mechanisms of oestrogen action may differ among epididymal regions, which may contribute to determine region-specific sperm functions.

Experimental varicocoele in rats affects mechanisms that control expression and function of the androgen receptor.

Varicocoele is an important cause of male infertility. Normal male reproductive function and fertility depends on a delicate balance between androgen receptor (AR) and the classic oestrogen receptors ESR1 (ERα) and ESR2 (ERß). Using a model of surgically induced varicocoele in rats, this study aimed to investigate the effects of varicocoele on the expression of AR, ESR1, ESR2 and G-protein coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER). Varicocoele did not affect the mRNA and protein expression of ESR1 and ESR2 in both testes. Varicocoele did not affect the mRNA and protein expression of GPER in the right testis, but slightly reduced the mRNA and increased the protein levels in the left testis. Varicocoele did not affect the mRNA for AR, but reduced the protein levels in both testes. A proteomic approach was used in an attempt to find differentially expressed targets with possible correlation with AR downregulation. Varicocoele caused the differential expression of 29 proteins. Six proteins were upregulated, including the receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1), and 23 were downregulated, including dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase, alpha-enolase and pyrophosphatase 1. Western blot analysis confirmed that varicocoele upregulated the expression of RACK1, a protein involved with tyrosine phosphorylation and regulation of AR transcriptional activity, AR metabolism and dynamics of the blood-testis barrier. In conclusion, this study suggests that varicocoele affects mechanisms that control AR expression and function. This regulation of AR may play an important role in the varicocoele-induced testicular dysfunction. Furthermore, varicocoele downregulates several other proteins in the testis that may be useful markers of spermatozoa function and male infertility.

The anti-oestrogen fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) reduces the androgen receptor expression, ERK1/2 phosphorylation and cell proliferation in the rat ventral prostate.

This study proposed to investigate further the role of oestrogens during pubertal growth of rat ventral prostate, by analysing the effect of anti-oestrogen fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) on the expression of androgen (AR) and oestrogen receptors (ESR1 and ESR2), mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, and expression of Ki-67, a biomarker for cell proliferation. Ventral prostates were obtained from 90-day-old rats treated once a week for 2 months with vehicle (control) or ICI 182,780 (10 mg/rat, s.c.). Transcripts for AR, ESR1 and ESR2 were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Expression of AR, ESR1, ESR2, total and phospho-ERK1/2 was analysed by Western blot or immunofluorescence. Ki-67-positive cells and myosin heavy chain were detected by immunohistochemistry. Cylindrical epithelial cells slightly taller, epithelial dysplasia and an increase in smooth muscle layer were observed in the ventral prostate from ICI 182,780-treated rats. ICI 182,780 did not change the mRNA, but decreased the protein levels for AR in the ventral prostate. The expression of ESR1 (mRNA and protein) was upregulated by ICI 182,780, but no changes were observed on ESR2 expression (mRNA and protein). ICI 182,780 decreased the phosphorylation state of ERK1/2, with no changes in total ERK1/2 levels. Ki-67-positive cells in the ventral prostate were also decreased by ICI 182,780. In conclusion, ICI 182,780 induces downregulation of AR expression and may block the translocation of ESR1 and ESR2 from the nucleus to the plasma membrane, decreasing ERK1/2 phosphorylation and prostatic epithelial cell proliferation. These findings provide a basis for physiological roles of oestrogen in the ventral prostate. Further studies with fulvestrant are necessary in benign prostate hyperplasia and prostatic cancer models.

Role of the rate of internalization of the agonist-receptor complex on the agonist-induced down-regulation of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor.

The extent of agonist-induced down-regulation of the LH/CG receptor (LHR) in human kidney 293 cells transfected with the rat LHR (rLHR) is much lower than in two Leydig tumor cell lines (MA-10 and R2C) that express the rodent LHR endogenously. This difference can not be attributed to differences in the recycling of internalized receptors, or in the replenishment of new receptors at the cell surface. It can be correlated, however, with the half-life of internalization of the bound agonist, which is approximately 60 min in Leydig tumor cells and about 100 min in transfected 293 cells. To determine whether the rate of internalization of the bound agonist affects down-regulation, we compared these two parameters in 293 cells expressing four rLHR mutants that enhance internalization and three mutants that impair internalization. We show that all four mutations of the rLHR that enhanced internalization enhanced down-regulation, while only one of the three mutations that impaired internalization impaired down-regulation. In addition, cotransfections of 293 cells with the rLHR-wt and three constructs that enhanced internalization (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, beta-arrestin, and arrestin-3) increased down-regulation, while a related construct (visual arrestin) that had no effect on internalization also had no effect on down-regulation. We conclude that the rate of internalization of the agonist-LHR complex is the main determinant of the extent of down-regulation of the LHR.

Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases on the agonist-induced phosphorylation and internalization of the follitropin receptor.

The experiments presented herein were designed to identify members of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family that participate in the agonist-induced phosphorylation and internalization of the rat FSH receptor (rFSHR). Western blots of human kidney 293 cells (the cell line used in transfection experiments) and MSC-1 cells (a cell line derived from Sertoli cells that displays many of the differentiated functions of their normal counterparts) reveal the presence of GRK2 and GRK6 in both cell lines as well as GRK4 in MSC-1 cells. Cotransfection of 293 cells with the rFSHR and GRK2, GRK4alpha, or GRK6 resulted in an increase in the agonist-induced phosphorylation of the rFSHR. Cotransfections of the rFSHR with GRKs or arrestin-3 enhanced the agonist-induced internalization of the rFHSR, and combinations of GRKs and arrestin-3 were more effective than the individual components. To characterize the involvement of endogenous GRKs on phosphorylation and internalization, we inhibited endogenous GRK2 by overexpression of a kinase-deficient mutant of GRK2 or G alpha t, a scavenger of G betagamma. We also inhibited endogenous GRK6 by overexpression of a kinase-deficient mutant of GKR6. All three constructs were effective inhibitors of phosphorylation, but only the kinase-deficient mutant of GRK2 and G alpha t inhibited internalization. The inhibition of internalization induced by these two constructs was less pronounced than that induced by a dominant-negative mutant of the nonvisual arrrestins, however. The finding that inhibitors of GRK2 and GRK6 impair phosphorylation, but only the inhibitors of GRK2 impair internalization, suggests that different GRKs have differential effects on receptor internalization.

Mutation of individual serine residues in the C-terminal tail of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor reveal distinct structural requirements for agonist-induced uncoupling and agonist-induced internalization.

We have previously mapped the agonist-induced phosphorylation of the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (rLHR) to a locus of four serines (Ser635, Ser639, Ser649, and Ser652) located in the C-terminal tail. The removal or mutation of this locus delays the time course of agonist-induced uncoupling of the rLHR from its effector system without affecting the overall magnitude of uncoupling, and it retards the endocytosis of the agonist-receptor complex. We have now prepared and analyzed four new rLHR mutants in which each of these serines were individually mutated to alanines. The data presented show that each mutation reduces agonist-promoted rLHR phosphorylation by 20-40%. Mutation of Ser635 or Ser639 delayed the time course of agonist-induced uncoupling to about the same extent as the simultaneous mutation of all four serines. Mutation of Ser635 or Ser639 also retarded agonist-induced internalization, but the magnitude of this decrease was less than that induced by the simultaneous mutation of all four serines. Mutation of Ser649 had no effect on agonist-induced uncoupling but retarded agonist-induced internalization to the same extent as the simultaneous mutation of all four serines. Mutation of Ser652 has little or no effect on either of these two parameters. Co-transfection studies with dominant-negative arrestins and dominant-negative dynamin reveal that, despite differences in their rates of internalization, rLHR-wild-type, rLHR-S639A, and rLHR-S649A are internalized by an arrestin- and dynamin-dependent pathway. These data show that the structural requirements needed for the agonist-induced uncoupling and internalization of the rLHR are distinct.

Receptor-mediated endocytosis of angiotensin II in rat myometrial cells.

The events involved in the processing of the angiotensin II (Ang II)-receptor complex were studied in primary cultures of rat myometrial cells. Ang II bound to rat myometrial cells in a specific, time- and temperature-dependent fashion. Pretreatment with cycloheximide did not interfere with binding up to 3 hr, but inhibited increases in binding observed over longer periods. The [3H]Ang II binding to intact cells was inhibited by dithiothreitol (DTT), and the rank order of potency of Ang II and nonpeptide antagonists to inhibit the [3H]Ang II binding was Ang II > Losartan >> PD 123319 or CGP 42112B, indicating the presence of the AT1 receptor type. Whereas most of the [3H]Ang II binding at 4 degrees was susceptible to acid or pronase treatment, binding at 35 degrees was resistant to both treatments, suggesting an internalization of the Ang II-receptor complex. Phenylarsine oxide (PAO) and N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) caused a concentration-dependent inhibition when the binding assay was performed at 35 degrees, but no effect was observed at 4 degrees, indicating that these agents did not alter cell-surface binding but actually prevented the internalization process. Simultaneous treatment with 1 mM DTT or beta-mercaptoethanol prevented the inhibitory effect of NEM, but only DTT could prevent the inhibition caused by PAO, indicating that two closely located sulfhydryl groups must be involved in the internalization process. Chloroquine (100 microM) inhibited the [3H]Ang II dissociation from cells, and monensin (25 microM) induced a 30% inhibition of [3H]Ang II binding (35 degrees, 3 hr), suggesting endosomal processing of the Ang II-receptor complex with receptor recycling to the cell surface. These results indicate that Ang II binding to AT1 receptors in rat myometrial cells is followed by internalization of the Ang II-receptor complex and recycling of the receptor to the cell surface.

Receptors for androgen-binding proteins: internalization and intracellular signalling.

In plasma, most steroid hormones are bound and transported by the specific binding protein, testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin (TeBG). For years, it was believed that the only function of this protein was to regulate the concentration of free steroids in plasma. However, a number of reports have provided evidence for the presence of specific TeBG receptors on plasma membranes. Furthermore, the interaction of TeBG with its receptor was shown to be inhibited when steroids are bound to TeBG, suggesting that TeBG is an allosteric protein. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the evidence that androgen-binding proteins bind to membrane receptors, and, in some cells, this binding stimulates cAMP accumulation, and transfer TeBG/ABP into tissue as a consequence of receptor mediated endocytosis. Recent studies from our laboratories have demonstrated binding and uptake of TeBG by MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The interaction of unligated rabbit TeBG with membranes from MCF-7 cells resulted in a time and concentration-dependent increase in adenylate cyclase activity. The TeBG alone also had a reproducible effect on intact cells by increasing cAMP accumulation by 30-35%. The addition of DHT to cells, after TeBG has been allowed to bind, resulted in increases in cAMP of greater than 4-fold. This effect was not blocked by antiandrogens. These data support the hypothesis that extracellular SHBG is a regulator of cellular function through a membrane receptor that is coupled to adenylate cyclase.