Same day discharge after chronic total occlusion interventions: A single center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and safety of same day discharge (SDD) after chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: CTO PCI has been associated with higher complication rates and procedural and hospitalization costs. Shortening post-PCI hospitalization length not only increases the patients' comfort but at the same time it consists an important part of cost reduction policies. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the 30-day outcomes of patients who underwent CTO PCI at the Red Cross Hospital, Greece between January 2016 and June 2019 and underwent SDD versus non-SDD. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat target vessel revascularization, tamponade, and stroke. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients (mean age 63.7 ± 8.9 years) were included, of whom 51 (30%) underwent SDD. SDD patients were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (51 vs. 31%, p = .015), arterial hypertension (89 vs. 67%, p < .001), and acute coronary syndrome presentation (39.7 vs. 21.6%, p = .022), compared with non-SDD patients. Forearm access was used in all SDD patients and in 83% of the non-SDD patients. The 30-day incidence of MACE was 0% in the SDD group and 1.6% in the non-SDD group. Multivariable analysis showed that diabetes mellitus and longer procedural time were associated with lower probability of SDD (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.73 and OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SDD appears to be feasible and safe in selected patients undergoing an uncomplicated CTO PCI through forearm approach.

Distal Radial Access: A Review Article.

Transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiography and interventions has been increasingly used over the last decades and has become the default strategy in the majority of catheterization laboratories worldwide. Recently, a novel transradial access site, the distal radial access (DRA), has been proposed as an alternative to traditional TRA. Several case reports and case series have been published on this new approach over the last year showing overall good success rates. Aim of this review is to present the possible benefits and drawbacks of DRA and offer guidance on its successful use.

Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization: Initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Distal transradial access (dTRA) by the snuffbox approach for coronary catheterization has emerged as an alternative to the classic forearm TRA with certain advantages and limitations.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the dTRA exclusively from the right arm. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (31 males and 18 females, mean age 64 ± 12 years), who were candidates for coronary catheterization in two cath laboratory centers, regardless of the indication, were recruited. Right dTRA was exclusively used. Radial artery patency both at the forearm and at the snuffbox region was evaluated 24 h after successful hemostasis by triplex ultrasonography. All complications were recorded until 24 h after the procedure. RESULTS: The indication for catheterization was an acute coronary syndrome in 24.5%, stable coronary artery disease in 22.4%, and other reasons in 53.1%. The overall failure attempt incidence was 10.2% and the mean puncture time 3.9 ± 4.1 min. Angiography only was performed in 81.8% and angiography followed by percutaneous coronary intervention in 18.2% of the patients. Manual hemostasis was applied in 63.6% of the patients, which had a significantly shorter duration than device hemostasis (11 ± 7 versus 198 ± 42 min, p < 0.001). No distal or forearm radial artery occlusion was observed on triplex ultrasonography 24 h after successful hemostasis. No major complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This two-center study, utilizing exclusively the right dTRA, provides further data regarding the snuffbox approach in an all-comers population. Further worldwide reports will elucidate new aspects of the technique.

Single Sheath for Dual Injection Prior to CTO Intervention.

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a dual injection using a single sheath approach, in order to evaluate a CTO and plan a future intervention.

Parallel Stenting for Treatment of an In-stent Chronic Total Occlusion after Successful Dissection Reentry Technique.

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) are the most challenging type of procedure in interventional cardiology and are traditionally associated with increased complexity and reduced procedural success rates. New techniques, such as retrograde approach and dissection reentry technique, offer alternatives in case of traditional antegrade wiring failure. In this paper, we present a successful implantation of a stent parallel to other existing stent in an in-stent CTO (IS-CTO) using dissection reentry technique. The technical details involved and the clues to successful outcome in an individual with in-stent CTO are discussed.

"Single Arm-Double Access" for CTO Intervention.

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a dual-access approach for CTO intervention using transradial and ipsilateral transulnar access. Although retrograde CTO intervention is a challenging procedure, a single arm-double access approach seems to be a feasible alternative that may be useful in patients with limited access-site availability.

Distal Versus Traditional Radial Approach for Coronary Angiography.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of distal radial (DR) versus traditional radial (TR) approach during coronary angiography. METHODS: Two hundred patients scheduled to undergo transradial coronary angiography were randomized between the two approaches. Primary endpoint of the study was switching to another access site due to inability of successful target artery cannulation. Secondary endpoints were time to cannulation, total procedure duration, number of attempts, number of skin punctures and duration of manual hemostasis. Secondary safety endpoints were the rate of moderate or severe spasm, arm hematoma EASY class III or more and radial artery occlusion at discharge. Quality of life endpoint was the patient's preference of cannulation method at 30 days. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was met in 30 patients (30%) from the DR group and 2 patients (2%) from the TR group (p < 0.001). The time of cannulation was longer in the DR group compared to the TR group (269 ±â€¯251 s vs 140 ±â€¯161 s, p < 0.001), but this did not affect the total procedural duration (925 ±â€¯896 s vs 831 ±â€¯424 s, p = 0.494). The number of attempts and the number of skin punctures were more in the DR group compared to the TR group (6.8 ±â€¯6.2 vs 3.4 ±â€¯4.5, p < 0.001 and 2.4 ±â€¯1.7 vs 1.6 ±â€¯1.2, p < 0.001, respectively). However, DR treated patients had faster manual hemostasis time compared to TR treated patients (568 ±â€¯462 s vs 841 ±â€¯574 s, p = 0.002). There were no differences recorded in the safety endpoints of moderate or severe spasm, EASY grade III or more radial hematomas or the incidence of radial artery occlusion after the procedure. Patients' preference to the randomized puncture sites was the same (79% vs 85%, p = 0.358). CONCLUSION: Distal radial approach is associated with lower successful cannulation rates and shorter manual hemostasis time compared to the traditional radial approach.

Alternative access site choice after initial radial access site failure for coronary angiography and intervention.

BACKGROUND: Transradial access for coronary catheterization is more technically challenging compared to the traditional transfemoral approach and radial access failure is quite common. The aim of this study is to describe the additional steps after initial radial access site failure in a high specialized forearm approach center. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all coronary catheterizations performed in our Department between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed, with focus on arterial access. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred forty six procedures were evaluated. The initial access site used was right radial [1173 procedures (87.1%)], left radial [120 procedures (8.9%)], right ulnar [7 procedures (0.5%)], left ulnar [40 procedures (2.9%)] and femoral approach [6 procedures (0.4%)]. Radial artery cannulation failure was observed in 37 procedures (2.9% of 1293 procedures with initial radial approach). Failure of procedure completion after successful radial sheath insertion was observed in 46 procedures (3.6%). The alternative access site after initial radial approach failure was contralateral radial [43 procedures (51.8%)], ipsilateral ulnar [22 procedures (26.5%), contralateral ulnar [12 patients (14.5%)] and femoral approach [6 procedures (7.2%)]. CONCLUSION: Forearm arteries can be used as alternative access site after initial radial approach failure in order to reduce the use of femoral approach during cardiac catheterization.

Strategies to increase the use of forearm approach during coronary angiography and interventions.

The aim of this article is to focus on the utilization of forearm approach for cardiac catheterization in challenging groups of patients. Radial and ulnar approaches have gained significant popularity among the majority of interventional cardiologists. Multiple studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of forearm route for cardiac catheterization and have highlighted the significant reduction in bleeding complications by avoiding the puncture of the groin. In this review we present the strategies need to be followed in order to apply the forearm approach in challenging group of patients.

Hand Hematoma After Cardiac Catheterization Via Distal Radial Artery.

This is the first reported case of severe hand hematoma after cardiac catheterization through the distal radial artery, with the hematoma extending distally to the sheath insertion site. The distribution of the hematoma in our case is completely different compared to the hematomas observed after traditional radial catheterization, which used to extend to the forearm. Therefore, the traditional EASY classification may not apply to hematomas after catheterization through the distal radial artery.

Forearm Versus Femoral Approach for Cardiac Catheterization in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is considered a relative contraindication for forearm (radial or ulnar) cardiac catheterization. However, in everyday practice, many ESRD patients are catheterized from the forearm. The aim of this study was to compare femoral and forearm approach for cardiac catheterization in ESRD patients. METHODS: All cardiac catheterization procedures performed in ESRD patients in three Greek hospitals in a 2-year period (2014-2015) were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint of the study was major access-site complication, defined as any Blood Academic Research Consortium class ≥3 bleeding or limb ischemia requiring intervention or prolonging hospitalization. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 124 procedures were performed in 109 ESRD patients: 44 procedures (35.5%) were performed transfemorally and 80 procedures (64.5%) were performed from the forearm approach (77 transradial [96.3%] and 3 transulnar [3.7%]). Forearm access was always performed from the contralateral arm of a functional hemodialysis access site. Sixty-one procedures (49.6%) were diagnostic coronary artery angiographies (CAAs) and 63 procedures (50.4%) were percutaneous coronary interventions with or without CAA. Two deaths and 1 procedure-related myocardial infarction were recorded during hospitalization. Five patients suffered major access-site complications, all from the femoral group (5/44 vs 0/80; P<.01). Three transradial patients had asymptomatic radial artery occlusion after a diagnostic procedure. Five patients (4.0%) had problems with their hemodialysis access site during long-term follow-up, and required a new access site. CONCLUSION: Forearm approach for cardiac catheterization is feasible and safe in ESRD patients. All measures to preserve radial patency should be taken in this high-risk patient group, where a possible forearm artery occlusion might have serious consequences.

"Ping-pong" technique for treating a balloon uncrossable chronic total occlusion.

Balloon uncrossable lesions are a well-known challenge during chronic total occlusion (CTO) interventions. The technique of using two different catheters into the same coronary artery, the so-called "ping-pong" technique, is a technique described for treating complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), like perforations or rotational atherectomy burr entrapment. We describe a case where the "ping-pong" technique was successfully used to facilitate treatment of a balloon uncrossable CTO lesion.

Echocardiography and cardiac arrhythmias.

Cardiac arrhythmias refer to any abnormality or disturbance in the normal activation sequence of the myocardium and may be indicative of structural heart disease and the cause of significant cardiovascular complications and sudden cardiac death. The following review summarizes the current state-of-the-art knowledge on the role of echocardiography in the management of cardiac arrhythmias and focuses on atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias where echocardiography presents a particular diagnostic and prognostic interest. Moreover, a brief reference is made to the effect of cardiac arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities on echocardiographic examination.

Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.

The transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiography and interventions is increasingly utilized around the world. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most common significant complication after transradial catheterization, with incidence varying between 1% and 10%. Although RAO is rarely accompanied by hand ischemia, it is an important complication because it prohibits future transradial access and radial artery utilization as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting or arteriovenous fistula formation. In this review, we discuss factors predicting the occurrence of RAO, aspects of accurate and prompt recognition, methods that contribute to its prevention and possible treatment options.

Needle versus cannula over needle for radial artery cannulation during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of radial artery cannulation with needle versus cannula over needle during transradial coronary angiography and intervention. METHODS: Five hundred patients scheduled to undergo transradial catheterization were randomized between the two methods. Primary endpoint of the study was the combined endpoint of switching to another access site due to inability of successful sheath insertion or switching to another method of cannulation (from needle to cannula over needle and vice versa). RESULTS: The primary end point was met in 12 patients (4.8%) from the needle group and 14 patients (5.6%) from the cannula over needle group (p=0.695). There were no differences in switching of cannulation method [10 (4.0%)% versus 11 (4.4%), p=0.831], switching of access site [6 (2.8%) versus 9 (3.6%), p=0.441), time for artery cannulation [1.20 (0.80-2.20) min versus 1.26 (1.01-2.39) min, p=0.152], total procedure time [15.05 (9.47-29.03) min versus 19.14 (10.13-32.02) min, p=0.112] number of attempts [2 (1-4) versus 2 (1-5), p=0.244] and number of skin punctures [1 (1-2) versus 1 (1-2), p=0.399] before successful radial artery cannulation. There were no differences recorded in the safety endpoints of EASY grade III or more radial hematomas [2 (0.8%) versus 1 (0.4%), p=1.000] or the incidence of radial artery occlusion after the procedure [9 (3.6% versus 16 (6.8%), p=0.358]. CONCLUSION: Radial artery cannulation with needle and cannula over needle seems to be equal in terms of efficacy and safety.

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after complex percutaneous coronary intervention using forearm approach.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a forearm approach. BACKGROUND: SDD has been shown to be safe after elective, low-risk PCI. However, the feasibility and safety of SDD in more complex patients and lesions has received limited study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1190 elective PCIs that were performed between January 2013 and December 2015 at the Red Cross General Hospital. RESULTS: Of the 1190 PCIs, 166 (13.9%) were complex (bifurcations, vein and arterial grafts, unprotected left main, last remaining vessel, chronic total occlusions, or with utilization of rotational atherectomy or hemodynamic support). As compared with non-complex cases, complex cases were associated with older age, male gender, higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, lower prevalence of smoking, higher utilization of femoral access and 7F guiding catheters, higher contrast utilization and fluoroscopy dose, longer fluoroscopy time, more stents per lesion, more frequent single vessel treatment and non-complete revascularization, and treatment with ticagrelor and bivalirudin. Among the patients who underwent complex PCI (n=166), twenty eight (16.9%) were discharged the same day. SDD after complex PCI was associated with younger age and more frequent use of forearm access. The 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events after complex PCI was 0% vs 3.6% (p=0.59) in patients with SDD vs. overnight hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: SDD is feasible and safe in selected patients undergoing elective complex PCI using the forearm approach.

Predictors of same day discharge after percutaneous coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to identify possible predictors for same day discharge (SDD) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Same day discharge after PCI is becoming more and more appealing and patient's selection criteria are being formulated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in all PCI procedures from January 2013 until December 2015. Patients were discharged the same day (SDD group) or had at least one overnight stay (non-SDD group). The decision of SDD or not was on treating physician discretion. We evaluated predictors of SDD decision by a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred sixty eight procedures were performed from our department during the study period: 308 patients (26.4%) were discharged the same day (SDD group) and the rest 860 procedures (73.6%) had at least one overnight stay (non-SDD group). Multivariate analysis revealed that forearm approach (OR=5.498, CI: 2.067-14.629; p=<0.001), patient's residency proximal to the hospital (OR=4.543, CI: 2.406-8.580; p<0.001), completion of the procedure before 13,00p.m. (OR=3.437, CI: 1.789-0.6.601; p<0.001) and the success of the performed procedure (OR=1.125, CI 1.043-2.135; p=0.044) were positive predictors of SDD, while presentation with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina (OR=0.542, CI: 0.268-0.872; p<0.010) and amount of contrast used (OR=0.910, CI: 0.852-0.969; p<0.030) were negative predictors of SDD. CONCLUSION: In retrospect, both procedural and demographic details play a crucial role in patient selection for same day discharge post coronary percutaneous intervention.

Transulnar approach for coronary catheterization in patients with a harvested ipsilateral radial artery: A case series.

Forearm approach for coronary catheterization is associated with better outcomes, compared to the femoral approach. However, the possibility of post catheterization forearm artery occlusion is a medical concern, which leads many patients to be treated transfemorally. We present a case series of patients who had a harvested radial artery and were successfully catheterized from ipsilateral ulnar artery without any complications recorded.