The Anteroposterior Positioning of Viscoelastic Cervical Disc Prosthesis Does Not Alter the Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While first-generation articulated disc prostheses had an ideal positioning schematically as posterior as possible because of their geometrically determined center of rotation, the dogma may change for viscoelastic implants, whose center of rotation is free. Our hypothesis was to assess whether the anteroposterior positioning (APP) of a viscoelastic implant may influence the clinical or radiological outcomes at follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (mean age 47 years) were evaluated, with an average follow-up of 25.9 months. The primary outcome was the implants' APP on lateral radiographs. APP between 0% and 49% meant anterior centering, 50% perfect centering, and 51% to 100% posterior centering. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: anterior positioning and posterior positioning. Measurements were performed blindly to the functional outcomes. Visual analog scale for neck pain and radicular pain and the Neck Disability Index were assessed. Range of motion was measured at the last follow-up. The C2 to C7 Cobb angle and the spinocranial angle were also measured. RESULTS: The median crude offset from the vertebral endplate center was 0.4 mm (mean: 0.3 mm, Q1: -1.5 mm, Q3: 2 mm; range, -2.9 to 4 mm). The mean overall APP was 49%, 45.2% (95% CI, 43.2%-47.1%) in the anterior group, and 54.1% (95% CI, 51.4%-55.3%) in the posterior group. Fifteen patients were in the group anterior positioning and 10 in the group posterior positioning. The mean spinocranial angle was 79° preoperatively and 74° preoperatively (P = 0.04). Functional outcomes were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < 10-4). There was no significant correlation between the APP, functional outcomes, and range of motion. CONCLUSION: The APP of the CP-ESP viscoelastic disc arthroplasty does not significantly influence the clinical or radiological outcomes at follow-up. This study suggests that this type of implant tolerates greater variability in its implantation technique.

Patient perception of leg length after total hip arthroplasty does not correlate with sagittal lumbar spine stiffness, history of spinal pathology or fusion.

PURPOSE: Although spinal pathology or fusion can change patients' posture and pelvic orientation, their correlation with perception of limb length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well understood. We hypothesised that LLD perception after THA would not correlate with a history of spinal pathology, fusion or sagittal lumbar spine stiffness among patients who underwent THA. METHODS: Four hundred consecutive patients who underwent THA and had a complete set of anteroposterior and lateral EOS® imaging in standing and sitting positions were included in this retrospective case-control study. All patients underwent THA between 2011 and 2020. Sagittal lumbar spine stiffness was measured by changes in lumbar lordosis and sacral slope from the standing to the sitting position (lumbar spine stiffness: standing sacral slope-sitting sacral slope < 10°). Anatomical and functional lower extremity length, change in the centre of hip rotation, coronal and sagittal knee alignment, and hindfoot height were measured. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the correlation between patient perceptions of LLD, and the variables found to be significant in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: There was a substantial difference between the patients with and without LLD perceptions regarding axial pelvic rotation (p = 0.001), knee flexum-recurvatum (p = 0.007) and hindfoot height (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between patients with and without LLD perceptions regarding differences in femoral length (p = 0.06), history of spine pathology or fusion (p = 0.128) and lumbar spine stiffness (p = 0.955). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant correlation between perceptions of LLD after THA and spinal fusion or lumbar spine stiffness. Changes in the position of the centre of hip rotation can affect the functional leg length. Surgeons should consult patients regarding other factors, such as knee alignment or hind-/midfoot pathologies, as well as compensatory mechanisms, such as axial pelvic rotation, that could affect perceptions of LLD.

Fast quasi-automated 3D reconstruction of lower limbs from low dose biplanar radiographs using statistical shape models and contour matching.

Three-dimensional bone reconstructions from medical imaging are essential for biomechanical modelling and are growing tools in clinics. Several methods of lower limbs reconstruction from biplanar radiographs have been proposed in the literature but with significant operator dependence. A novel reconstruction method based on reduced manual annotation, statistical shape models and fully automatic adjustments was proposed in this study. While significantly reducing operator intervention, the proposed method demonstrated similar or better precision than previous approaches on clinical parameters. Meanwhile, shape accuracy was improved to around 1mm. By quasi-automating the 3D reconstruction without loss of accuracy and precision, the proposed approach is a considerable step towards extensive use of 3D personalized models in clinical routine and large cohort biomechanical studies.

Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.

BACKGROUND: Many THA simulation models rely on a limited set of preoperative static radiographs to replicate sagittal pelvic tilt during functional positions and to recommend an implant orientation that minimizes the risk of prosthetic impingement. However, possible random changes in pelvic or lower extremity angular motions and the effect of coronal and axial pelvic tilt are not included in these preoperative models. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Can prosthetic impingement occur if the pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment randomly varies up to ± 5° from what is measured on a single preoperative static radiographic image? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment angles have a similar effect on the risk of prosthetic impingement? METHODS: A de-identified pelvis and lower-body CT image of a male patient without previous THA or lower extremity surgery was used to import the pelvis, femur, and tibia into a verified MATLAB computer model. The motions of standing, pivoting, sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward were simulated. THA implant components included a full hemispherical acetabular cup without an elevated rim, polyethylene liner without an elevated rim, femoral head (diameter: 28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm, or 40 mm), and a triple-taper cementless stem with three different neck shaft angles (127°, 132°, or 135°) with a trapezoidal neck were used in this model. A static model (cup anatomical abduction 40°, cup anatomical anteversion 20°, stem anatomical anteversion 10°) with a predefined range of sagittal pelvic tilt and hip alignment (0° coronal or axial tilt, without random ± 5° change) was used to simulate each motion. We then randomly varied pelvic tilt in three different pelvic planes and hip alignments (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, rotation) up to ± 5° and assessed the same motions without changing the implant's anatomical orientation. Prosthetic impingement as the endpoint was defined as mechanical abutment between the prosthetic neck and polyethylene liner. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of variation in pelvic tilt and hip alignment (predictors) on prosthetic impingement (primary outcome). RESULTS: The static-based model without the random variation did not result in any prosthetic impingement under any conditions. However, with up to ± 5° of random variation in the pelvic tilt and hip alignment angles, prosthetic impingement occurred in pivoting (18 possible combinations), sit-to-stand (106 possible combinations), and squatting (one possible combination) when a 28-mm or a 32-mm head was used. Variation in sagittal tilt (odds ratio 4.09 [95% CI 3.11 to 5.37]; p < 0.001), axial tilt (OR 3.87 [95% CI 2.96 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), and coronal tilt (OR 2.39 [95% CI 2.03 to 2.83]; p < 0.001) affected the risk of prosthetic impingement. Variation in hip flexion had a strong impact on the risk of prosthetic impingement (OR 4.11 [95% CI 3.38 to 4.99]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combined effect of 2° to 3° of change in multiple pelvic tilt or hip alignment angles relative to what is measured on a single static radiographic image can result in prosthetic impingement. Relying on a few preoperative static radiographic images to minimize the risk of prosthetic impingement, without including femoral implant orientation, axial and coronal pelvic tilt, and random angular variation in pelvis and lower extremity alignment, may not be adequate and may fail to predict prosthetic impingement-free ROM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determining a safe zone for THA implant positioning with respect to impingement may require a dynamic computer simulation model to fully capture the range of possible impingement conditions. Future work should concentrate on devising simple and easily available methods for dynamic motion analysis instead of using a few static radiographs for preoperative planning.

Low pelvic incidence is a risk factor for intraoperative complications in minimally invasive anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyses the effect of anatomical factors on difficulties for femoral access and intraoperative complications with a modified minimally invasive ALA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 310 consecutive patients who had primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) by single surgeon using same approach and technique, and being suitable for EOS were included. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions and pelvic and femoral parameters were measured. All intra- and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation were assessed. Intraoperative complications included femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure. RESULTS: 10 patients (3.2%) had intraoperative femoral fractures (2 greater trochanter, 8 calcar). Difficult access to the proximal femur was reported for 10 other patients (3.2%). Patients with intraoperative complications presented a significantly lower pelvic incidence (PI) than patients without intraoperative complications (mean PI: 39.4° vs. 56.9°, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The pelvic incidence can be useful to detect anatomically less favourable patients for THA implantation using ALA.

Femoral stem neck geometry determines hip range of motion shape : a computer simulation study.

AIMS: In computer simulations, the shape of the range of motion (ROM) of a stem with a cylindrical neck design will be a perfect cone. However, many modern stems have rectangular/oval-shaped necks. We hypothesized that the rectangular/oval stem neck will affect the shape of the ROM and the prosthetic impingement. METHODS: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) motion while standing and sitting was simulated using a MATLAB model (one stem with a cylindrical neck and one stem with a rectangular neck). The primary predictor was the geometry of the neck (cylindrical vs rectangular) and the main outcome was the shape of ROM based on the prosthetic impingement between the neck and the liner. The secondary outcome was the difference in the ROM provided by each neck geometry and the effect of the pelvic tilt on this ROM. Multiple regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The stem with a rectangular neck has increased internal and external rotation with a quatrefoil cross-section compared to a cone in a cylindrical neck. Modification of the cup orientation and pelvic tilt affected the direction of projection of the cone or quatrefoil shape. The mean increase in internal rotation with a rectangular neck was 3.4° (0° to 7.9°; p < 0.001); for external rotation, it was 2.8° (0.5° to 7.8°; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the importance of attention to femoral implant design for the assessment of prosthetic impingement. Any universal mathematical model or computer simulation that ignores each stem's unique neck geometry will provide inaccurate predictions of prosthetic impingement. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):780-789.

How much change in pelvic sagittal tilt can result in hip dislocation due to prosthetic impingement? A computer simulation study.

Developing spinal pathologies and spinal fusion after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can result in increased pelvic retroversion (e.g., flat back deformity) or increased anterior pelvic tilt (caused by spinal stenosis, spinal fusion or other pathologies) while bending forward. This change in sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) can result in prosthetic impingement and dislocation. Our aim was to determine the magnitude of SPT change that could lead to prosthetic impingement. We hypothesized that the magnitude of SPT change that could lead to THA dislocation is less than 10° and it varies for different hip motions. Hip motion was simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting and pivoting in Matlab software. The implant orientations and SPT angle were modified by 1° increments. The risk of prosthetic impingement in pivoting caused by increased pelvic retroversion (reciever operating characteristic [ROC] threshold as low as 1-3°) is higher than the risk of prosthetic impingement with increased pelvic anteversion (ROC threshold as low as 16-18°). Larger femoral heads decrease the risk of prosthetic impingement (odds ratio {OR}: 0.08 [932 mm head]; OR: 0.01 [36 mm head]; OR: 0.002 [40 mm head]). Femoral stems with a higher neck-shaft angle decrease the prosthetic impingement due to SPT change in motions requiring hip flexion (OR: 1.16 [132° stem]; OR: 4.94 [135° stem]). Our results show that overall, the risk of prosthetic impingement due to SPT change is low. In particular, this risk is very low when a larger diameter head is used and femoral offset and length are recreated to prevent bone on bone impingement.

Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion?

BACKGROUND: To create a safe zone, an understanding of the combined femoral and acetabular mating during hip motion is required. We investigated the position of the femoral head inside the acetabular liner during simulated hip motion. We hypothesized that cup and stem anteversions do not equally affect hip motion and combined hip anteversion. METHODS: Hip implant motion was simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting, and pivoting positions using the MATLAB software. A line passing through the center of the stem neck and the center of the prosthetic head exits at the polar axis (PA) of the prosthetic head. When the prosthetic head and liner are parallel, the PA faces the center of the liner (PA position = 0, 0). By simulating hip motion in 1-degree increments, the maximum distance of the PA from the liner center and the direction of its movement were measured (polar coordination system). RESULTS: The effect of modifying cup and stem anteversion on the direction and distance of the PA's change inside the acetabular liner was different. Stem anteversion influenced the PA position inside the liner more than cup anteversion during sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward (P = .0001). This effect was evident even when comparing stems with different neck angles (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Cup anteversion, stem anteversion, and stem neck-shaft angle affected the PA position inside the liner and combined anteversion in different ways. Thus, focusing on cup orientation alone when assessing hip motion during different daily activities is inadequate.

Sagittal Spinopelvic Translation Is Combined With Pelvic Tilt During the Standing to Sitting Position: Pelvic Incidence Is a Key Factor in Patients Who Underwent THA.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal spinopelvic translation (SSPT) is the horizontal distance from the hip center to the C7 plumb line (C7PL). SSPT is an important variable showing the overall patient balance in different functional positions which could affect the rate of hip instability. This study investigates the SSPT modification in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A total of 120 patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively on standing and sitting acquisitions (primary unilateral THA without complication). SSPT is zero when the C7PL goes through the center of the femoral heads and positive when the C7PL is posterior to the hips' center (negative if anterior). Three subgroups were defined based on the pelvic incidence (PI): low PI <45°, 45°< normal PI <65°, or high PI >65°. RESULTS: The overall mean preoperative SSPT change from standing to sitting was 2.2 cm ([-7.2 to 17.4]) (P < .05). The overall mean postoperative SSPT change from standing to sitting was 1.2 cm ([-14.2 to 22.4]) (P < .05). In low- and normal-PI groups, standing to sitting SSPT and preoperative to postoperative changes in standing SSPT were increased significantly after surgery with the C7PL behind the hips' center (P < .05). In the high-PI group, standing to sitting SSPT was increased postoperatively (P = .034) (no significant changes from preoperative to postoperative status in standing and sitting). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation from standing to sitting positions combines pelvic tilt and anteroposterior pelvic translation. THA implantation induces significant changes in SSPT mainly for low- and standard-PI patients. This is an important variable to consider when investigating the causes of THA subluxation or dislocation.

Lumbar and cervical viscoelastic disc replacement: Concepts and current experience.

The ideal lumbar and cervical discs should provide six degrees of freedom and tri-planar (three-dimensional) motion. Although all artificial discs are intended to achieve the same goals, there is considerable heterogeneity in the design of lumbar and cervical implants. The "second generation total disc replacements" are non-articulating viscoelastic implants aiming at the reconstruction of physiologic levels of shock absorption and flexural stiffness. This review aims to give an overview of the available implants detailing the concepts and the functional results experimentally and clinically. These monobloc prostheses raise new challenges concerning the choice of materials for the constitution of the viscoelastic cushion, the connection between the components of the internal structure and the metal endplates and even the bone anchoring mode. New objectives concerning the quality of movement and mobility control must be defined.

How do global sagittal alignment and posture change after total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Postural change after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still a matter of discussion. Previous studies have mainly concentrated on the pelvic motions. We report the post-operative changes of the global sagittal posture using pelvic, spinal, and lower extremities parameters. METHODS: 139 patients (primary THA, without previous spinal or lower extremity surgery) were included. We measured pelvic parameters [SS, sacral slope; PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; APP angle, anterior pelvic plane angle] and the global posture parameters (SVA, sagittal vertical angle; GSA, global sagittal angle; TPA, T1 pelvic angle). Patients were categorized into low PI group < 45°, 45° < medium PI < 65°, and high PI > 65°. RESULTS: Mean GSA and SVA decreased post-operatively (p = 0.005 and p = 0.004 respectively). The TPA change was not significant (p = 0.078). In the low PI group, GSA (5.4 ± 5.0 to 4.3 ± 4.0, p = 0.005) and SVA (5.4 ± 4.9 to 4.2 ± 4.1, p = 0.038) decreased with more posterior pelvic tilt. Post-operative TPA was significantly higher (8.4 ± 10.6 to 9.8 ± 10.7; p = 0.048). In the medium PI group, SVA decreased (4.2 ± 4.6 to 3.6 ± 4.5, p = 0.020) with more posterior pelvic tilt. In the high PI group, pelvic and global posture parameters did not evolve significantly. CONCLUSION: PI is the key determining factor in pelvic tilt modification after THA. Patients with low PI demonstrate significant modification in spine, pelvic, and lower extremities. Pelvic tilt is the main adaptation mechanism for medium incidence patients whereas pelvic tilt does not change in high PI patients after surgery.

Stand-to-Sit Kinematics of the Pelvis Is Not Always as Expected: Hip and Spine Pathologies Can Have an Impact.

BACKGROUND: Stand-to-sit pelvis kinematics is commonly considered as a rotation around the bicoxofemoral axis. However, abnormal kinematics could occur for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, affecting the hip-spine complex. The aim of this study is to perform a quantitative analysis of the stand-to-sit pelvis kinematics using 3D reconstruction from biplanar x-rays. METHODS: Thirty volunteers as a control group (C), 30 patients with hip pathology (Hip), and 30 patients with spine pathology (Spine) were evaluated. All subjects underwent standing and sitting full-body biplanar x-rays. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed in each configuration and then translated such as the middle of the line joining the center of each acetabulum corresponds to the origin. Rigid registration quantified the finite helical axis (FHA) describing the transition between standing and sitting with two specific parameters. The orientation angle (OA) is the signed 3D angle between FHA and bicoxofemoral axis, and the rotation angle (RA) represents the signed angle around FHA. RESULTS: The mean OA was -1.8° for the C group, 0.3° for Hip group, and -2.4° for Spine group. There was no significant difference in mean OA between groups. However, variability was higher for the Spine group with a standard deviation (SD) of 15.9° compared with 10.8° in the C group and 12.3° in the Hip group. The mean RA in the C group was 18.1° (SD, 9.0°). There was significant difference in RA between the Hip and Spine groups (21.1° [SD, 8.0°] and 16.4° [SD, 10.8°], respectively) (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Hip and spine pathologies affect stand-to-sit pelvic kinematics.

Five-year follow-up of clinical and radiological outcomes of LP-ESP elastomeric lumbar total disc replacement in active patients.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease at the lumbar spine may involve fusion. Total disc replacement (TDR) is an alternative treatment to avoid fusion-related adverse events, specifically adjacent segment disease. New generation of elastomeric non-articulating devices has been developed to more effectively replicate the shock absorption and flexural stiffness of native disc. PURPOSE: To report 5 years clinical and radiographic outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and position of the center of rotation after a viscoelastic lumbar TDR. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-one patients OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical evaluation was based on visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, short form-36 (SF-36) including the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), and general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ28). The radiological outcomes were ROM and position of the center of rotation at the index and the adjacent levels and the adjacent disc height changes. METHODS: Our study group included 61 consecutive patients with monosegmental disc replacement. We selected patients who could provide a global lumbar spine mobility analysis (intermediate functional activity according to the Baecke score). Hybrid constructs had been excluded. Only the cases with complete clinical and radiological follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months were included. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in VAS (3.3±2.5 vs. 6.6±1.7, p<.001), in ODI (20±17.9 vs. 51.2±14.6, p<.001), GHQ28 (52.6±15.5 vs. 64.2±15.6, p<.001), SF-36 PCS (58.8±4.8 vs. 32.4±3.4, p<.001), and SF-36 MCS (60.7±6 vs. 42.3±3.4, p<.001). The mean location centers of the index level and adjacent discs were comparable to those previously published in asymptomatic patients. According to the definition of Zigler and Delamarter, all of our cases remained grade 0 for adjacent level disc height (within 25% of normal). CONCLUSIONS: This series reports significant improvement in midterm follow-up after TDR, which is consistent with previously published studies but with a lower rate of revision surgery and no adjacent level disease pathologies. The radiographic assessment of the patients demonstrated the quality of functional reconstruction of the lumbar spine after LP-ESP viscoelastic disc replacement.

Are advanced three-dimensional imaging studies always needed to measure the coronal knee alignment of the lower extremity?

BACKGROUND: Coronal malalignment of the lower extremity is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. Restoring satisfactory alignment after tibial osteotomy improves the long-term success of this conservative surgery. The purpose of our study was to determine (1) if there is a difference between two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between the mechanical axes of the femur and the tibia, (2) which parameter most affects 2D-3D HKA measurement, and (3) the percentage of patients who are at risk of error in HKA measurement. METHODS: We reviewed imaging studies of the consecutive patients referred to us for hip or knee pain between June and October 2013. Patients with previous pelvis or lower extremity surgery were excluded. RESULTS: In 51 % (95/186) of lower extremities examined, the 3D method showed more valgus than the 2D method, and in 49 % (91/186), the 3D method showed more varus. In 12 % of extremities (23/186), the knee varus or valgus alignment was completely opposite in 3D images compared to 2D images. Having more than 7° of flexum/recurvatum alignment increased error in 2D HKA measurement by 5.7°. This was calculated to be 0.15° per 1° increase in femoral torsion and 0.05° per 1° increase in tibial torsion. Approximately 20 % of patients might be at risk of error in HKA angle measurement in 2D imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic surgeons should assess lower extremity alignment in standing position, with enough exposure of the extremity to find severe alignment or rotational deformities, and consider advanced 3D images of those patients who have them. Otherwise, HKA angle can be measured with good accuracy with 2D techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III diagnostic.

The global alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: our experience using the EOS full-body images.

Lumbar stenosis is frequently observed and treated by spine surgeons. The extent of neurological decompression and the potential spinal fixation are the basic concerns when surgery is planned. But this segmented approach to the problem is sometimes insufficient due to the complex functional situations induced by a sagittal imbalance of the patient and the combination of pathologies known as hip-spine or knee-spine syndromes. A total of 373 consecutive patients included from our EOS and clinical data base. Patients were divided in two groups. Group A included patients presenting exclusive spinal issues (172 cases) out of whom 117 (68 %) had sagittal imbalance. Among 201 patients with associated lower limbs issues (group B), 122 (61 %) had sagittal imbalance. The perception of imbalance was noticed in 54 % (93 cases) in group A and 57 % (115 cases) in group B. In the global series of 239 imbalanced cases, the key point was a spine issue for 165 patients (the 117 patients with only spine problems and 48/122 cases with combined spine and lower limbs problems). But in the patients with combined spine and lower limbs problems, we individualized hip-spine syndromes (24/122 patients) and knee-spine syndromes (13/122 patients). In some cases, (37/122 patients) the anatomical and functional situations were more complex to characterize a spine-hip or a hip-spine problem. The EOS full-body images provide new information regarding the global spinal and lower limbs alignment to improve the understanding of the patient functional posture. This study highlights the importance of the lower limb evaluation not only as compensatory mechanism of the spinal problems but also as an individualized parameter with its own influence on the global balance analysis. Level of evidence IV diagnostic case series.

Good vs Poor Results After Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis Method Using Implant and Anatomic Parameters With the EOS Imaging System.

BACKGROUND: Existing imaging techniques and single-parameter analyses, in nonfunctional positions, fail to detect the differences between patients with good vs poor results after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The present study developed an analysis method using the EOS full-body, low-dose, biplanar, weightbearing imaging system to compare good vs poor patients after total hip arthroplasty and to report on our preliminary experiences (17 good, 18 poor). RESULTS: All revision cases were found to have at least 4 high or low implant or anatomic parameters relative to the good group. These included acetabular cup orientation, sagittal pelvic tilt, sacral slope, femoral offset, and neck-shaft angle. Acetabular cup orientation differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: With the EOS system, a large cohort can be studied relatively quickly and at low dose, which could lead to patient-specific guidelines.

The innovative viscoelastic CP ESP cervical disk prosthesis with six degrees of freedom: biomechanical concepts, development program and preliminary clinical experience.

The viscoelastic cervical disk prosthesis ESP is an innovative one-piece deformable but cohesive interbody spacer. It is an evolution of the LP ESP lumbar disk implanted since 2006. CP ESP provides six full degrees of freedom about the three axes including shock absorbtion. The prosthesis geometry allows limited rotation and translation with resistance to motion (elastic return property) aimed at avoiding overload of the posterior facets. The rotation center can vary freely during motion. The concept of the ESP prosthesis is fundamentally different from that of the devices currently used in the cervical spine. The originality of the concept of the ESP® prosthesis led to innovative and intense testing to validate the adhesion of the viscoelastic component of the disk on the titanium endplates and to assess the mechanical properties of the PCU cushion. The preliminary clinical and radiological results with 2-year follow-up are encouraging for pain, function and kinematic behavior (range of motion and evolution of the mean centers of rotation). In this series, we did not observe device-related specific complications, misalignment, instability or ossifications. Additional studies and longer patient follow-up are needed to assess long-term reliability of this innovative implant.

Total Hip Prostheses in Standing, Sitting and Squatting Positions: An Overview of Our 8 Years Practice Using the EOS Imaging Technology.

More total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed worldwide and especially in younger and more active patients compared to earlier decades. One of the focuses of THA research in the future will be on optimizing the radiological follow-up of these patients using 2D and 3D measurements of implants position while reducing the radiation dose delivered. Low-dose EOS(®) imaging is an innovative slot-scanning radiograph system providing valuable information in patient functional positions (standing, sitting and even squatting positions). EOS has been proven accurate and reliable without significant inconvenience caused by the metallic artifacts of implants. The ability to obtain precise data on implant orientation according to the patient posture opens new perspectives for a comprehensive analysis of the pelvic frontal and sagittal balance and its potential impact on implants function and failures. We report our 8 years experience on our first 300 THA patients using this technology routinely for pre and post op evaluation. Our results will be compared and confronted with the actual literature about this innovative technology. We shall especially emphasize our experience about patients with abnormal posture and the evolution of the subject over time, because the phenomenon of an aging spine is frequently associated with the process of aging hips.

Offset and anteversion reconstruction after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation with the low-dose EOS system comparing two- and three-dimensional imaging.

PURPOSE: Accurate evaluation of femoral offset is difficult with conventional anteroposterior (AP) X-rays. The EOS imaging system is a system that makes the acquisition of simultaneous and orthogonal AP and lateral images of the patient in the standing position possible. These two-dimensional (2D) images are equivalent to standard plane X-rays. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions are obtained from these paired images according to a validated protocol. This prospective study explores the value of the EOS imaging system for comparing measurements of femoral offset from these 2D images and the 3D reconstructions. METHODS: We included 110 patients with unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). The 2D offset was measured on the AP view with the same protocol as for standard X-rays. The 3D offset was calculated from the reconstructions based on the orthogonal AP and lateral views. Reproducibility and repeatability studies were conducted for each measurement. We compared the 2D and 3D offset for both hips (with and without THA). RESULTS: For the global series (110 hips with and 110 without THA), 2D offset was 40 mm (SD 7.3; 7-57 mm). The standard deviation was 6.5 mm for repeatability and 7.5 mm for reproducibility. Three-dimensional offset was 43 mm (SD 6.6; 22-62 mm), with a standard deviation of 4.6 for repeatability and 5.5 for reproducibility. Two-dimensional offset for the hips without THA was 40 mm (SD 7.0; 26-56 mm), and 3D offset 43 mm (SD 6.6; 28-62 mm). For THA side, 2D offset was 41 mm (SD 8.2; 7-57 mm) and 3D offset 45 mm (SD 4.8; 22-61 mm). Comparison of the two protocols shows a significant difference between the 2D and 3D measurements, with the 3D offset having higher values. Comparison of the side with and without surgery for each case showed a 5-mm deficit for the offset in 35 % of the patients according to the 2D measurement but in only 26 % according to the 3D calculation. CONCLUSIONS: This study points out the limitations of 2D measurements of femoral offset on standard plane X-rays. The reliability of the EOS 3D models has been previously demonstrated with CT scan reconstructions as a reference. The EOS imaging system could be an option for obtaining accurate and reliable offset measurements while significantly limiting the patient's exposure to radiation.

Sagittal rebalancing of the pelvis and the thoracic spine after pedicle subtraction osteotomy at the lumbar level.

DESIGN: Retrospective study of radiologic records of patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) procedures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the restoration of spinal balance above and below the osteotomy site after PSO for various causes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The normal sagittal balance of the spine has been widely documented. Sagittal imbalance can be surgically treated with vertebral osteotomy. Reports have described its technical aspects and local radiologic results. Less is known about the spontaneous rebalancing of the spine cranially and caudally to the osteotomy site. METHODS: The French Scoliosis Study Group conducted a multicenter retrospective study from the records of a combined cohort of 356 patients. Spinal balance after PSO was assessed radiologically. In this study, we focused specifically on measuring the reorientation of the pelvis and upper thoracic segments and investigated the influence of pelvic incidence, osteotomy level, and regional lordosis gain. The population was classified according to the indication for the procedure: posttraumatic deformity, degenerative kyphosis, scoliosis, or ankylosing spondylarthritis. RESULTS: The average regional lordosis gain was 26.1 degrees. In the degenerative kyphosis and scoliosis groups, the level of osteotomy and the incidence angle tended to influence pelvic adaptation (better balance of the caudal portion was associated with low-level PSO and low-incidence angle). The posttraumatic deformity cases had a specific pattern: balance changes after PSO were limited to the local lordosis gain, with less pelvic and thoracic reorientation, probably due to spinal flexibility. On the contrary, the spondylarthritis cases showed less pelvic and more thoracic reorientation, probably due to hip and spinal stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Better knowledge from a large series of the overall spontaneous spinal balance after PSO and the pelvic/thoracic reorientation would be useful for preoperative planning of lumbar osteotomies and predicting pelvic and hip reorientation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.