Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 46(11): 1472-9, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21243026

ABSTRACT

Little is known about serum vitamin D levels following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients are instructed to avoid sun exposure because of an increased risk of skin cancers. Altered gastrointestinal absorptive capacity as a result of GVHD, bile acid or pancreatic enzyme insufficiency or bacterial overgrowth may lead to difficulty in absorbing the fat-soluble vitamin D. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency, and factors associated with 25(OH)D deficiency, among children and adults who were at least 1 year following HCT. A total of 95 participants (54 males and 41 females) completed a questionnaire on usual diet and lifestyle, and provided a blood sample for 25(OH)D determinations between November 2008 and July 2009. The majority of participants had serum 25(OH)D levels ≥75 nmol/L (n=62, 65%), 23 had insufficient levels (50-75 nmol/L) and 10 participants were deficient (<50 nmol/L). The majority of participants reported regular use of vitamin D supplements (n=58, 61%). Prednisone use was significantly inversely associated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Total vitamin D intake was the strongest single predictor of 25(OH)D concentrations. These findings suggest that 400-600 IU vitamin D per day appears to be required to achieve optimal serum 25(OH)D concentrations following HCT.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prednisone/adverse effects , Sunlight , Survivors , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood
3.
Br J Cancer ; 91(11): 1866-72, 2004 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15520821

ABSTRACT

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are highly susceptible to acute leukaemia. Given the potential role of infections in the aetiology of leukaemia in children without DS, we investigated whether there was an association between early-life infections and acute leukaemia in children with DS. Maternal infections during pregnancy were also examined. We enrolled 158 incident cases of acute leukaemia in children with DS (97 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and 61 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)) diagnosed at Children's Oncology Group institutions between 1997 and 2002. DS controls (N=173) were selected from the cases' primary care clinics and frequency matched on age at leukaemia diagnosis. Data were collected on demographics, child's medical history, mother's medical history, and other factors by maternal interview. Analyses were conducted using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. A significant negative association was observed between acute leukaemia and any infection in the first 2 years of life (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.33-0.92); OR=0.53, 95% CI (0.29-0.97); and OR=0.59, 95% CI (0.28-1.25) for acute leukaemia combined, ALL, and AML respectively). The association between acute leukaemia and maternal infections during pregnancy was in the same direction but not significant. This study offers support for the hypothesis that early-life infections may play a protective role in the aetiology of acute leukaemia in children with DS.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/complications , Infections/complications , Leukemia, Myeloid/etiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/etiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Age of Onset , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Down Syndrome/pathology , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Leukemia, Myeloid/epidemiology , Leukemia, Myeloid/prevention & control , Male , Maternal Age , Odds Ratio , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 15(7): 552-9, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14760518

ABSTRACT

Excessive intake of vitamin A is postulated to have a detrimental effect on bone by inducing osteoporosis. This may lead to an increased risk of fracture, particularly in persons who are already at risk of osteoporosis. However, few studies have specifically examined the association of vitamin A intake through diet and supplement use, with fractures in a cohort of older, community-dwelling women. We prospectively followed a cohort of 34,703 postmenopausal women from the Iowa Women's Health Study to determine if high levels of vitamin A and retinol intake through food and supplement use were associated with an increased risk of hip or all fractures. A semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to obtain the participants' baseline vitamin A and retinol intake. Participants were followed for a mean duration of 9.5 years for incident self-reported hip and nonhip fractures. After multivariate adjustment, it was revealed that users of supplements containing vitamin A had a 1.18-fold increased risk of incident hip fracture (n = 525) compared with nonusers (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.41), but there was no evidence of an increased risk of all fractures (n = 6,502) among supplement users. There was also no evidence of a dose-response relationship in hip fracture risk with increasing amounts of vitamin A or retinol from supplements. Furthermore, our results showed no association between vitamin A or retinol intake from food and supplements, or food only, and the risk of hip or all fractures. In conclusion, we found little evidence of an increased risk of hip or all fractures with higher intakes of vitamin A or retinol among a cohort of older, postmenopausal women.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/etiology , Postmenopause/physiology , Vitamin A/administration & dosage , Aged , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Diet , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Female , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Humans , Iowa/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vitamin D/administration & dosage
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 41(1): 54-61, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11757055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A planning model was used to guide the design of a randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of tailored interventions in lowering dust exposures in small woodworking shops. METHODS: Guided by Green's PRECEDE-PROCEED model, we used a planning committee, focus groups and a pilot study to gain information on small woodworking shops, causes of and controls for high dust levels, and barriers and incentives surrounding availability and use of dust controls. RESULTS: The planning committee identified key characteristics of small woodworking shop owners. Focus groups with owners and employees served to further elucidate why dust control was considered unimportant. The pilot study gave measures of dust exposures, tasks, and use of controls. Interventions focused on providing owners with technical and economic assistance to lower dust levels and an educational program for employees discussing health effects and effective methods of dust control. CONCLUSIONS: The PRECEDE-PROCEED model proved a useful framework for designing an intervention in the occupational setting.


Subject(s)
Dust/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Wood , Feasibility Studies , Focus Groups , Humans , Minnesota , Pilot Projects
7.
Am J Health Promot ; 16(1): 27-33, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11575053

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of lifestyle on the effectiveness of a low-intensity dietary intervention. DESIGN: A secondary data analysis was performed using data from the Eating Patterns Study, a randomized controlled trial that found that self-help materials with physician advice was effective in changing dietary intake and behavior. SETTING: Primary care clinics in a large health maintenance organization. SUBJECTS: A total of 2111 patients with a routine scheduled appointment with their primary care physicians. MEASURES: Participants were grouped into one of six health lifestyle patterns based on similarities in baseline measures of alcohol intake, smoking, diet quality, and exercise. Within each lifestyle pattern, changes from baseline in usual fat and fiber intake (based on a food frequency) and a fat and fiber behavior score were compared at 3 months and 12 months for intervention vs. control participants. INTERVENTION: Self-help materials delivered by a physician with advice to change diet. RESULTS: Intervention participants in the fitness lifestyle group made the largest changes relative to controls for each dietary outcome at 3 and 12 months. For intervention participants defined by their alcohol intake or current smoking, either no changes in diet were observed compared with controls, or early changes were not sustained over time. Intervention-control comparisons within the remaining lifestyle patterns showed smaller dietary changes compared with the fitness lifestyle. This finding was similar to previously published results. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial had limited power to detect subgroup differences; however, these results suggest that lifestyle patterns may be useful in the development of effective, targeted interventions to change behavior.


Subject(s)
Feeding Behavior , Health Behavior , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Life Style , Data Collection , Disabled Persons , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Washington
8.
AIHAJ ; 62(3): 322-9, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11434438

ABSTRACT

Measures of workers' inhalable dust exposures, tasks, and ventilation use were made in five small woodworking shops prior to the start of an intervention effectiveness study aimed at lowering personal wood dust exposures. The data were used to (1) design a sampling protocol for an intervention success measure, (2) identify targets for intervention among the tasks and activities responsible for high dust levels, and (3) develop shop-level measures as tools for tailoring intervention activities. Geometric mean dust concentrations ranged from 1.6 to 9.9 mg/m3 in the five shops, with the highest levels occurring in a cabinet shop. All shops had centralized dust collection systems and workers generally used dust control on stationary tools (60-100% of the time) when it was available. Sanding with both stationary and handheld powered tools, cleaning with methods that can disperse dust (e.g., brushes, compressed air), and miscellaneous tasks were all responsible for significant personal exposures. The positive association between miscellaneous tasks and exposures probably reflects the high background levels generated by nearby processes. Sanding with both stationary tools and handheld powered tools represents the most significant influence on personal exposures in small woodworking shops. The authors conclude that pilot studies are useful tools for designing occupational health and safety intervention effectiveness studies.


Subject(s)
Dust/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure , Ventilation , Wood , Workplace , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Pilot Projects
9.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(6): 611-6, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11401910

ABSTRACT

Diabetes has been associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer in some epidemiological studies. Body mass index (BMI) and other measures of obesity have been associated positively with both diabetes and endometrial cancer. It is not clear whether or not the association of diabetes with endometrial cancer is explained entirely by obesity. Thus, we sought to test the hypothesis that diabetes is not associated with endometrial cancer independent of obesity. We examined the association between self-reported diabetes (onset at >30 years of age) and incident endometrial cancer in a prospective cohort study of 24,664 postmenopausal women in Iowa. Over 12 years of follow-up, 346 cases occurred among the cohort at risk. Data were analyzed using proportional hazards regression models. Diabetes was analyzed as reported at baseline and as a time-dependent variable using information obtained during follow-up. After adjustment for BMI, waist:hip ratio, and other covariates, the relative risk (RR) for women with diabetes versus women without diabetes was 1.43 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-2.1]. The diabetes association was confined to women in the upper two BMI quintiles (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.98-2.20), but a formal test of interaction was not statistically significant. Analyses that included diabetes ascertained at baseline and at follow-up gave similar results; the diabetes-associated RR in the higher BMI strata was 1.64 (95% CI, 1.16-2.31). We conclude that after adjustment for other risk factors, diabetes is associated with a modestly increased risk for endometrial cancer among women in this cohort.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications , Endometrial Neoplasms/etiology , Obesity/complications , Aged , Anthropometry , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
10.
Cancer ; 89(9): 1999-2005, 2000 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11064358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the number of cancer survivors increases, so will the number of second primary cancers, including breast carcinoma after cancer at another site. Limited information is available regarding the clinical characteristics of breast carcinoma after a primary at another site. METHODS: TUMORS (The Upper Midwest Oncology Registry Services) was used to identify 937 women with breast carcinoma occurring as a second primary after a first primary at a known site other than the breast. They were compared with a sample of 1874 women with first primary breast carcinoma, frequency-matched by age to the second primary group, for method of detection, tumor characteristics, and type of surgery. RESULTS: Women with breast carcinoma after cancer at another site tended to have smaller tumors and less extensive disease than women with first primary breast carcinoma and were somewhat more likely than first primary cases to have had their breast carcinoma detected by mammogram or clinical breast exam rather than detecting it themselves. Differences in method of detection accounted for differences in tumor size and extent. Second primary breast carcinoma was less likely to be lobular or mixed ductolobular carcinoma compared with first primary breast carcinoma. Surgical treatment (mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery) did not differ for first and second primary breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics of breast carcinoma after cancer at another site were by and large similar to those of first primary breast carcinoma. The more favorable prognostic characteristics among women with a history of cancer were accounted for by increased medical surveillance.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Self-Examination , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Mammography , Mastectomy , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery , Registries
11.
Womens Health Issues ; 10(4): 210-6, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10899668

ABSTRACT

We interviewed 419 adult women in Minnesota, who were selected at random and without a history of breast cancer, to ascertain what percentage could correctly report that cure was the same for breast conservation therapy and mastectomy, what percentage would state a preference for breast conservation therapy rather than mastectomy, and characteristics associated with these outcomes. Nearly all women (n = 360; 86%) had heard of both mastectomy and breast conservation therapy; among these women, 37% correctly reported that the two treatments were equally efficacious. Given a scenario where they were diagnosed with breast cancer amenable to either treatment, 58% of participants stated a preference for breast conservation therapy. Older women were less likely than younger women to know that cure was the same for breast conservation therapy and mastectomy (adjusted OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2, 1.0), and women residing in urban areas were more likely to prefer breast conservation therapy over mastectomy compared to rural residents (adjusted OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1. 3, 3.8). Comparing these findings to women diagnosed with breast cancer in Minnesota, breast conservation therapy was found to be performed less frequently than preference for such therapy among women in our study would suggest. Educating women prior to diagnosis about breast cancer treatment options, and exploring reasons for the gap between actual utilization of breast conservation therapy and prediagnosis preference, may be indicated.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mastectomy, Segmental/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Odds Ratio , Patient Satisfaction , Population Surveillance , Reference Values , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(14): 2117-28, 2000 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10904454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical guidelines on the health risks of obesity use body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and waist circumference, but the waist-hip ratio may provide independent information. METHODS: To assess the joint and relative associations of BMI, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio with multiple disease end points, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 31,702 Iowa women, aged 55 to 69 years and free of cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, assembled by random sampling and mail survey in 1986. Study end points were total and cause-specific mortality and incidence of site-specific cancers and self-reported diabetes, hypertension, and hip fracture over 11 to 12 years. RESULTS: The waist-hip ratio was the best anthropometric predictor of total mortality, with the multivariable-adjusted relative risk for quintile 5 vs 1 of 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4), compared with 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.0) for BMI and 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1. 3) for waist circumference. The waist-hip ratio was also associated positively with mortality from coronary heart disease, other cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and other causes. The waist-hip ratio was associated less consistently than BMI or waist circumference with cancer incidence. All anthropometric indexes were associated with incidence of diabetes and hypertension. For example, women simultaneously in the highest quintiles of BMI and waist-hip ratio had a relative risk of diabetes of 29 (95% confidence interval, 18-46) vs. women in the lowest combined quintiles. CONCLUSION: The waist-hip ratio offers additional prognostic information beyond BMI and waist circumference.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Women's Health , Abdomen , Aged , Body Constitution , Body Mass Index , Cause of Death , Coronary Disease/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Female , Hip Fractures/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Iowa/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate
13.
Epidemiology ; 11(1): 76-80, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10615848

ABSTRACT

Results from case-control studies suggest that induced abortion may be associated with a small increase in risk of breast cancer. While risk estimates from cohort studies have generally not observed such an association, these studies have had limited information regarding abortion and possible confounding variables. Therefore, we conducted a study among a cohort of post-menopausal women from whom detailed information regarding pregnancy outcomes as well as risk factors for breast cancer had been collected. The study sample included 37,247 Iowa Women's Health Study participants, 55-64 years of age at baseline in 1986, who reported no history of breast, or other, cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), and for whom information regarding pregnancy outcomes (that is, live birth, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy or induced abortion) was available. We used linkage with records of the State Health Registry of Iowa, part of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, to estimate the incidence of breast cancer among cohort members through 1995. We calculated age-adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals using Cox proportional hazards regression. Only 653 women (1.8%) reported an induced abortion. The age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer among women with prior induced abortion compared with those without was 1.1 (95% CI = 0.8-1.6). Relative risks were higher among women whose age at first abortion was less than 20 or at least 30 years, for those whose abortion took place after their first birth or who never gave birth, and for those with early termination (0-2 months). These estimates varied from 1.3-1.7, but the confidence intervals around each were wide. Since most women in this cohort were beyond their reproductive years when abortion became legal in 1973, the low prevalence of induced abortion argues for a cautious interpretation.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iowa/epidemiology , Life Style , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Risk Factors , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Am J Health Promot ; 15(2): 118-25, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11194695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Physicians acknowledge the need to advise their patients about dietary habits, but they may not have the training or tools to do this efficiently. In the context of a randomized trial, we investigated the feasibility of enlisting physicians to implement a dietary intervention in the primary care setting. METHODS: Physicians from 14 primary care practices were assigned via randomization to introduce a self-help booklet to promote dietary change at routine appointments. Delivery of the booklet was recorded by these intervention physicians at the clinic appointment; intervention participants were asked 3 months later in a telephone interview about whether they received and used the booklet. RESULTS: According to physician documentation, 95% of intervention participants who kept an appointment (n = 935) received the booklet; among participants completing a 3-month interview (n = 890), 96% reported the same. However, only about 50% of participants reported receiving the booklet from their physician; the remainder received the booklet from other clinic staff. Overall, 93% reported reading at least part of the booklet. Use of the booklet varied little whether it was delivered by a physician or staff person, but it was more likely to be read as time spent discussing the booklet increased. CONCLUSIONS: Physician cooperation and evidence of intervention effectiveness support the use of primary care for the delivery of interventions to change diet; training the entire health team and repeating dietary advice at subsequent visits may improve the success of such interventions.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Education/organization & administration , Nutritional Sciences/education , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Diet Surveys , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Pamphlets , Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Teaching Materials , Washington
15.
Prev Med ; 31(6): 706-13, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11133338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study objective is to evaluate the effect of monetary incentives on response rates of adolescents to a smoking-related survey as the first step toward participation in an intervention trial. METHODS: A sample of 4,200 adolescent members of a managed care organization were randomized to one of four incentive groups: a $2 cash group, a $15 cash group, a $200 prize drawing group, or a no-incentive group. We compared group-specific response rates and willingness to be contacted about future study activities, as well as costs. RESULTS: Incentives increased survey response rates (55% response without incentive vs. a 69% response with incentive), with response of 74% in the $15 cash group, 69% in the token group, and 63% with a prize incentive. Incentives did not adversely affect willingness of adolescents to be contacted about a smoking intervention, (65% willing with incentives vs. 60% without, P = 0.03). In terms of cost per additional survey completed, token and prize groups were marginally more expensive than the no-incentive group ($0.40 and $1.42, respectively) while the large cash incentive was substantially more costly ($11.37). CONCLUSIONS: Monetary incentives improve response rates to a mailed survey, without adverse impact on willingness to further participate in intervention activities. However, a variety of issues must be considered when using incentives for recruitment to intervention studies.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Patient Selection , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Minnesota/epidemiology , Motivation , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 5(3): 63-7, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10537608

ABSTRACT

A pilot study assessed whether medical records were a viable alternative to self-report for measuring mammography use in a population-based sample. Of 98 women contacted by telephone, 62 (63.3%) ultimately provided written consent to obtain their mammogram reports. Although all physicians complied with requests for records, an average of three physician contacts per woman were required and 87 percent of mammogram reports were located; therefore, records were available for only 56 percent of women contacted initially. This, coupled with the effort associated with obtaining the records, does not support the use of medical records as an alternative to self-report to measure mammography utilization in the general population.


Subject(s)
Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Utilization Review/methods , Female , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Minnesota , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Cancer ; 86(4): 628-37, 1999 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10440690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma, held in June 1990, recommended breast conservation therapy for the majority of women with Stage I or II breast carcinoma. The authors evaluated the national use of breast conservation therapy before and after the conference to determine whether the conference had had an impact on utilization. METHODS: Women with Stage I or II breast carcinoma (n = 109,880), diagnosed during the years 1983-1995, were identified via 9 population-based cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The likelihood of breast conservation surgery versus mastectomy and, among women who underwent breast conservation surgery, the likelihood of postoperative radiation therapy versus none, were assessed for 3 time periods (January 1983 to April 1985, May 1985 to June 1990, and July 1990 to December 1995). Associations between the use of breast conservation surgery or postoperative radiotherapy according to patient stage, age, race, and region were compared among women diagnosed before and after the NIH Consensus Development Conference. RESULTS: From 1985 (the year that the U.S. randomized controlled trial demonstrating equivalent efficacy between breast conservation therapy and mastectomy was published) through 1989, approximately 35% of women with Stage I and 19% of women with Stage II breast carcinoma underwent breast conservation surgery; these percentages remained constant throughout this period. Beginning in 1990, the year of the NIH Consensus Development Conference, the use of breast conservation surgery increased in each subsequent year; by 1995, 60% of women with Stage I and 39% of women with Stage II breast carcinoma received such treatment. However, regional variation in use was observed (Stage I, range 41.4-71.4% for 1995) and no registry reported breast conservation therapy for the majority of women with Stage II disease (range, 23.8-48.0%). The use of postoperative radiotherapy for women who underwent breast conservation surgery was similar in the periods before and after the conference. CONCLUSIONS: Although breast conservation therapy was performed more frequently following the NIH Consensus Development Conference, variation in use by region of the U.S. suggests the continued presence of barriers to widespread adoption of the recommendations formulated at the conference.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States
18.
Am J Epidemiol ; 149(1): 21-31, 1999 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9883790

ABSTRACT

Evidence on dietary risk factors for ovarian cancer is inconsistent, but some studies have suggested positive associations with dietary fat, lactose, and cholesterol and negative associations with green and yellow vegetable intake. By using information from the Iowa Women's Health Study, the authors investigated the association of epithelial ovarian cancer with dietary factors in a prospective study of 29,083 postmenopausal women. Dietary information was ascertained via a food frequency questionnaire mailed to participants in 1986. During 10 years of follow-up (1986-1995), 139 of the women developed incident epithelial ovarian cancer. Incidence of the disease was not associated with dietary fat intake. Lactose and cholesterol showed moderately elevated risks. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks for the lowest to highest quartiles of lactose intake were 1.00, 1.38, 1.25, and 1.60 (p for trend = 0.12). For cholesterol, the corresponding values were 1.00, 1.34, 1.86, and 1.55 (p for trend = 0.06). Consumption of eggs was also associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks for increasing frequency of egg consumption were 1.00 (<1/week), 1.12 (1/week), 2.04 (2-4/week), and 1.81 (>4/week) (p for trend = 0.04). Total vegetable intake was modestly and inversely associated with the risk of ovarian cancer (p for trend = 0.21). Green leafy vegetable intake was more strongly associated with a decreased risk: multivariable-adjusted relative risks for the lowest to highest intake levels were 1.00, 0.80, 0.87, and 0.44 (p = 0.01). These findings are generally in agreement with the results from previous, mostly case-control studies of diet and epithelial ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Diet , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Aged , Cholesterol , Dietary Fats , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lactose , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vegetables
19.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(4): 357-67, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9794167

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to investigate whether dietary associations with risk of colon cancer in women differ by family history of the disease. METHODS: Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of 35,216 Iowa (United States) women aged 55 to 69 years at baseline. Through 31 December 1995, 241 colon cancers were identified through record linkage with the State Health Registry. The cohort was stratified on family history of colon cancer in first-degree relatives; nutrient intakes were divided into tertiles. RESULTS: Analyses using Cox regression revealed that the association of most dietary components with colon cancer incidence were similar for individuals with and without a family history. However, total calcium intake was associated inversely with colon cancer among women with a negative family history (relative risk [RR] = 0.50 for upper cf lower tertile, P < 0.001), but was unrelated to incidence for women with a positive family history (RR = 1.1 for upper cf lower tertile, P = 0.69). Similarly, total vitamin E intake was associated with lower risk among women with a negative family history (RR = 0.67 for upper cf lower tertile, P = 0.04), but not among women with a positive family history (RR = 0.87 for upper cf lower tertile, P = 0.67). High intakes of fiber, fruits, and vegetables were each weakly inversely associated with risk among family-history negative women, but not among family-history positive women. CONCLUSIONS: These data, if corroborated, suggest that dietary factors typically associated with lower risk may be less effective risk-reduction interventions against colon cancer for individuals with a family history of colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Diet , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Dietary Fiber , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iowa/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pedigree , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Factors , Vitamins/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...