Anatomic Reduction of Greater Tuberosity Fragment for Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty: a Predictor of Good Clinical Outcome.

Objectives: Proximal humerus fractures account for four-five % of all fractures. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is indicated for complex fractures with high complication rates when treated with ORIF. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between the proper intraoperative tuberosity reduction, and the mid-to-long-term clinical outcome in a series of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture. Methods: Forty-one patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery between July 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Quantitative analysis of the reduction of the tuberosities was performed on postoperative X-rays focusing on the distance between reconstructed greater tuberosity and the apex of the head of the prosthesis, (head-tuberosity distance), and contact between tuberosity and humerus diaphysis. The University of California Los Angeles Score (UCLA) was calculated for each patient. Results: The mean time to surgery was 6.29 ± 2.8 days (range 2-18 days). Nine patients out of 41 (22%) had non anatomic tuberosity, and 32 (78%) were anatomic reduced. The UCLA score at the final follow-up was good and excellent (≥27) in 27 patients (66%), and poor (<27) in 14 (34%). A significant correlation was observed between proper tuberosity reduction and good/excellent UCLA scores (P<0.001). Conclusion: Hemiarthroplasty is a valid and reliable technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture not eligible for internal fixation, with high risk of failure. The proper tuberosity reconstruction, paying special attention to the HTD and the contact between the cortical of the humeral diaphysis and the reconstructed tuberosity, is essential to reach a good clinical outcome.

Accuracy of radiographic projections to guide cephalic screw position in pertrochanteric fracture: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Löwenstein Lateral view and the True Lateral view for the positioning of the cephalic hip screw, through a cadaveric study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We placed two Kirschner wires in eight femur specimens using an Antero-Posterior view, Löwenstein Lateral view and True Lateral view. The distances between the Kirschner wires and the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior cortex were measured in all projections. The head of the femur was then sectioned, and the same macroscopic distances were measured. Finally, we could calculate the accuracy of the two radiographic lateral projections. RESULTS: When the Kirschner wire was placed in the center of the head using the Antero-Posterior and the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9705 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1479 and 1.1584, respectively. When the Kirschner wire was placed superior on the Antero-Posterior and centrally on the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9930 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1159 and 0.7224, respectively. CONCLUSION: When the Kirschner wire was positioned proximal in Antero-Posterior view and central in True Lateral view, only the True Lateral view showed high accuracy.

A rare case of avulsion fracture of the iliac crest apophysis in a young female athlete.

Avulsion fractures of the iliac crest in the adolescent are rare injuries poorly described in literature. The rarity of this injury along with the late ossification of the growth plate of the iliac crest can lead to misdiagnosis and improper treatment. In presence of high clinical suspicion and negative x-ray findings, second level imaging is advisable. Case reports and some case series report on successful outcome of both surgical and non-surgical treatment. We present the case of a fifteen year old female athlete who sustained an avulsion fracture of the iliac crest during a running race. The patient was treated conservatively and returned to previous sport activities after four months from injury. Mechanism of injury, diagnostic options and treatment opportunities are also described.