The effect of ginger (Zingiber officinalis) and artichoke (Cynara cardunculus) extract supplementation on gastric motility: a pilot randomized study in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Prodigest® is the standardized combination of artichoke and ginger extracts. This combination was safe and effective in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. However, further evidence could be useful to shed new lights on the effect of Prodigest® on gastric motility. This pilot randomized study on healthy volunteers investigates the prokinetic activity of Prodigest®. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, cross-over study in healthy volunteers comparing Prodigest® versus placebo. Eleven healthy volunteers were enrolled. Each participant underwent two evaluations, at a 7-day interval. Ten minutes before the main meal, the baseline area of gastric volume was determined by ultrasonography. The subject was then given one Prodigest® or placebo capsule and, then consumed a standardized meal. One hour after the meal, the gastric volume was measured again. Two weeks after the second evaluation, three subjects repeated the above-mentioned procedures taking two capsules of Prodigest®. RESULTS: The mean gastric area at baseline was 3.2 ± 0.5 cm(2); after the meal, this figure was 8.4 ± 0.7 cm(2) with Prodigest® and 11.0 ± 1.5 cm2 with placebo (p<0.001). The after-meal gastric area was significantly smaller, with a -24% difference, following the combination of extracts, as compared with placebo (p<0.001). The effect of two capsules of Prodigest® seems to be more evident but due to the very small number of the patients sample further clinical data are necessary before confirming the dose-related effects. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study shows that Prodigest®, a standardized extract of ginger and artichoke, significantly promotes gastric emptying in healthy volunteers without being associated with notable adverse effects.

Cardiovascular disease: an economical perspective.

Cardiovascular diseases represent a relevant problem worldwide. Data from World Health Organization (W.H.O.) demonstrate that they are one of the principle causes of death: 30% of all losses of human life throughout the world are due to heart diseases. Such data buries a substantial economic cost considering both the direct component, first of all the national health expense, and the indirect part, such as absenteeism rate, productivity loss, quality of life and, more generally, social costs. The future scenario pictured by the W.H.O. reveals a negative trend due to an increasing in the rate of morbidity and mortality especially in Emerging Countries. One of the solution to stem the costs - economic and not - connected to cardiovascular diseases is to empower the prevention activities overall the actions of primary prevention. This require a change in the traditional patient-physician relationship management model to get to an organizational model centred on patient and based on a proactive approach. In this perspective in the paper will be analysed the principal changes that occurred in the Italian national healthcare system and in particular the strategic plans and actions in theme of cardiovascular prevention.

[The 3rd national workshop on defecography: the functional radiology of (neo) rectal ampullae (ileal reservoir, colo-anal anastomosis, continent perineal colostomy)]. / III workshop nazionale sulla defecografia: la fisioradiologia delle (neo)ampolle rettali (reservoir ileale, colo-ano-anastomosi, colostomia perineale continente).

A survey was made in 13 Italian centers with a questionnaire concerning the (a) indications, (b) postoperative complications, (c) functional results and (d) diagnostic imaging modalities related to the making of an ileal or colonic (neo) rectum. Ulcerative colitis (100%), familial polyposis (61.5%) and Crohn's disease (15.3%) were the most common indications for an ileal pouch; rectal cancer (7.96%), chronic inflammatory diseases (15.3%), diverticulosis, rectal prolapse, redundant colon and imperforate anus (7.6% each) were the most common indications for a colonic pouch. Postoperative complications included pelvic abscess (14%), sinus tract/dehiscence (10%) and bowel obstruction (9%). When compared with the S and W variants, the J-shaped ileoanal pouch proved superior because urgency and fecal retention rates were lower (18.4% vs. 44.4% and 23% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), despite slightly more frequent staining episodes (15.8% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.05). As for colonic ampullae, fecal retention and provoked evacuation were more frequent in the J pouch and after gracileplasty; urgency and incontinence in the straight colo-anal anastomosis (33.3% vs. 22.2% and 41.6% vs. 33.3%, respectively). The functional outcome was assessed by anal endosonography (available in 4/13 centers), defecography and anorectal manometry. Abnormal findings included: (a) reduced capacity, barium leakage, anal gaping, sphincter damage (urgency and incontinence); (b) barium retention, pouch dilatation, split evacuation, knobs and strictures (fecal retention).

[National working team report on defecography]. / "Working team report" nazionale sulla defecografia.

A questionnaire concerning defecography was submitted to 5 national experts in order to: 1) quantify the demand and 2) develop a consensus report. The demand is currently 2-8 exams week and the most frequent indication (70%) is obstructed defection, with/without constipation. The highest discriminatory capabilities was exhibited by the following variables: a) the anorectal angle (ARA) on straining and b) the distance from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) on squeezing (101.2 degrees +/- 15 vs. 120.6 degrees +/- 13, p < 0.05 and 27.4 mm +/- 15 vs. 2.4 mm +/- 7, p = 0.005, respectively) in chronically constipated patients (mean age: 60 years) when compared to the control group; and c) PCL on squeezing and at rest (35.5 mm +/- 20 vs. 2.4 mm +/- 7, p = 0.005 and 38.9 mm +/- 18 vs 18.4 mm +/- 17, p < 0.05, respectively) in patients with severe incontinence with respect to healthy subjects. While sensitivity and positive predictive values of the test were highest (97 and 98% respectively) for rectocele, specificity ranked first (92%) in anal gaping.

[Diseases detected with defecographic examination in 300 patients]. / Malattie riscontrate tramite esame defecografico su 300 pazienti.

Defecography is a radiological examination providing morphological details of the anorectal tract. Over almost 3 years, 300 patients were examined. The authors report on the method and the pathologic conditions they observed. The patients were seated in latero-lateral position on a radiolucent water-filled commode: lead marks were taped to define perianal skin. 150 ml of high-density barium paste were introduced into the rectum and radiographs were then acquired, at rest and during squeezing and straining. All examination phases, especially the study of dynamic evacuation, were recorded on a videotape connected to a brilliance intensifier. From their experience, the authors conclude that defecography is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of: rectocele, occult rectal prolapse, and elevator ani tone. The technique proved less useful in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. The authors strongly suggest that the patient be previously examined by a coloproctologist. Defecography is thought to help the surgeon in the choice of therapy, together with other diagnostic procedures and with clinical history.