Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Lipidol ; 15(5): 629-648, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34802986

ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein measurements are pivotal in the management of patients at risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) with myocardial infarction and coronary death as the main outcomes, and for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes CHD and stroke. Recent developments and changes in guidelines affect optimization of using lipid measures as cardiovascular biomarkers. This scientific statement reviews the pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical, and clinical aspects of lipoprotein measurements. Highlights include the following: i) It is acceptable to screen with nonfasting lipids. ii) non-high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is measured reliably in either the fasting or the nonfasting state and can effectively guide ASCVD prevention. iii) low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can be estimated from total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) measurements. For patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL and TG ≤150 mg/dL it is reasonable to use the Friedewald formula. However, for those with TG 150-400 mg/dL the Friedewald formula for LDL-C estimation is less accurate. The Martin/Hopkins method is recommended for LDL-C estimation throughout the range of LDL-C levels and up to TG levels of 399 mg/dL. For TG levels ≥400 mg/dL LDL-C estimating equations are currently not recommended and newer methods are being evaluated. iv) When LDL-C or TG screening results are abnormal the clinician should consider obtaining fasting lipids. v) Advanced lipoprotein tests using apolipoprotein B (apoB), LDL Particle Number (LDL-P) or remnant cholesterol may help to guide therapeutic decisions in select patients, but data are limited for patients already on lipid lowering therapy with low LDL-C levels. Better harmonization of advanced lipid measurement methods is needed. Lipid measurements are recommended 4-12 weeks after a change in lipid treatment. Lipid laboratory reports should denote desirable values and specifically identify extremely elevated LDL-C levels (≥190 mg/dL at any age or ≥160 mg/dL in children) as severe hypercholesterolemia. Potentially actionable abnormal lipid test results, including fasting triglycerides (TG) ≥500 mg/dL, should be reported as hypertriglyceridemia. Appropriate use and reporting of lipid tests should improve their utility in the management of persons at high risk for ASCVD events.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Lipid Metabolism Disorders , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Biomarkers/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 42(3): 307-13, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16770290

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Dyslipidemia has become a common problem in HIV disease, especially in patients on combination antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. However, little data are available to evaluate lipid abnormalities in women on ARV therapy. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, the prevalence of abnormal plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations as well as other biomarkers for vascular disease was determined in 184 HIV-positive women from 2 HIV clinics in Atlanta during 2002. RESULTS: Most of the women were African American (89%), with median age of 41 years (range 21-72); 6% were diabetic, 44% smoked, and 67% were overweight. ARV therapy defined the comparison groups that included treatment with a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen for more than 3 months in 76 (41%), treatment with a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen for more than 3 months in 38 (20%), and no ARV therapy for the past 3 months in 70 (38%). Women being treated with a PI or NNRTI had higher total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than patients on no therapy (P < 0.05 for each). Women treated with either PIs or NNRTIs had significantly higher apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein C-III levels than patients on no therapy (P < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional study of HIV-infected women, either PI or NNRTI therapy elevated levels of total cholesterol and specific apolipoproteins. These findings, on a background of an older population with additional risk factors of smoking, obesity, and diabetes, may lead to future atherosclerotic events in these patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Apolipoproteins/blood , Cholesterol/blood , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/blood , Humans , Middle Aged , Triglycerides/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...