Improving the Care and Cost of Treating Community-Acquired Stage 3 and 4 Decubitus Ulcers.

INTRODUCTION: The healthcare costs for treatment of community-acquired decubitus ulcers accounts for $11.6 billion in the United States annually. Patients with stage 3 and 4 decubitus ulcers are often treated inefficiently prior to reconstructive surgery while physicians attempt to optimize their condition (debridement, fecal/urinary diversion, physical therapy, nutrition, and obtaining durable medical goods). We hypothesized that hospital costs for inpatient optimization of decubitus ulcers would significantly differ from outpatient optimization costs, resulting in significant financial losses to the hospital and that transitioning optimization to an outpatient setting could reduce both total and hospital expenditures. In this study, we analyzed and compared the financial expenditures of optimizing patients with decubitus ulcers in an inpatient setting versus maximizing outpatient utilization of resources prior to reconstruction. METHODS: Encounters of patients with stage 3 or 4 decubitus ulcers over a 5-year period were investigated. These encounters were divided into two groups: Group 1 included patients who were optimized totally inpatient prior to reconstructive surgery; group 2 included patients who were mostly optimized in an outpatient setting and this encounter was a planned admission for their reconstructive surgery. Demographics, comorbidities, paralysis status, and insurance carriers were collected for all patients. Financial charges and reimbursements were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Forty-five encounters met criteria for inclusion. Group 1's average hospital charges were $500,917, while group 2's charges were $134,419. The cost of outpatient therapeutic items for patient optimization prior to wound closure was estimated to be $10,202 monthly. When including an additional debridement admission for group 2 patients (average of $108,031), the maximal charges for total care was $252,652, and hospital reimbursements were similar between group 1 and group 2 ($65,401 vs $50,860 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The data derived from this investigation strongly suggests that optimizing patients in an outpatient setting prior to decubitus wound closure versus managing the patients totally on an inpatient basis will significantly reduce hospital charges, and hence costs, while minimally affecting reimbursements to the hospital.

Patient-Specific Implant Customization for Treatment of Internal Orbital Fractures Using Office-Based Three-Dimensional Printing.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology aids the reconstructive surgeon in designing and tailoring individualized implants for the reconstruction of complex craniofacial fractures. Three-dimensional modeling and printing have traditionally been outsourced to commercial vendors but can now be incorporated into both private and academic craniomaxillofacial practices. The goal of this report is to present a low-cost, standardized office-based workflow for restoring bony orbital volume in traumatic orbital fractures. METHODS: Patients with internal orbital fractures requiring open repair were identified. After the virtual 3D models were created by iPlan 3.0 Cranial CMF software (Brainlab), the models were printed using an office-based 3D printer to shape and modify orbital plates to correctly fit the fracture defect. The accuracy of the anatomic reduction and the restored bony orbital volume measurements were determined using postoperative computed tomography images and iPlan software. RESULTS: Nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 8 patients had unilateral fractures and 1 patient had bilateral fractures. Average image processing and print time were 1.5 hours and 3 hours, respectively. The cost of the 3D printer was $2500 and the average material cost to print a single orbital model was $2. When compared with the uninjured side, the mean preoperative orbital volume increase and percent difference were 2.7 ± 1.3 mL and 10.9 ± 5.3%, respectively. Postoperative absolute volume and percent volume difference between the orbits were -0.2 ± 0.4 mL and -0.8 ± 1.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based 3D printing can be routinely used in the repair of internal orbital fractures in an efficient and cost-effective manner to design the implant with satisfactory patient outcomes.

Brent Technique of Repair Versus Nagata Auricular Reconstruction for Microtia Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Up to 17.4 in every 10,000 births are affected by microtia, but no consensus exists on a gold standard technique for autogenous repair. In this study, the authors compare 2 common methods-the Brent and Nagata autogenous costal cartilage ear reconstruction techniques. A systematic review of the literature and a quantitative meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches were performed. The outcomes analyzed included rates of infection, necrosis, cartilage exposure, cartilage resorption, hematoma, wire extrusion, and hypertrophic scar. METHODS: A MEDLINE database systematic review with the following keywords: microtia, Brent, and Nagata was performed. Case reports and articles without original data or patient outcomes were excluded. Inclusion methods for study selection are outlined in Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SCS/F461 , below. The prevalence of outcomes for each study was analyzed through meta-analysis of proportions using Stata. RESULTS: A total of 536 potential studies were retrieved for review. Twelve of these studies met inclusion criteria. Four studies utilized the Brent method of repair with the inclusion of 563 ear reconstructions. Nine studies implemented the Nagata technique in 2304 reconstructions. Two studies directly compared the Brent (327 ears) and Nagata (471 ears) techniques. The calculated rate and 95% confidence intervals are summarized in Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/SCS/F461 . There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the Brent and Nagata microtic reconstruction techniques identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The Brent and Nagata microtia reconstruction techniques have no difference in the risk of infection, necrosis, cartilage exposure, cartilage resorption, hematoma, wire extrusion, or hypertrophic scars.

Autologous Fat Versus Hydroxyapatite Cement for Use in Frontal Sinus Obliteration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinus obliteration is a possible terminus for the management of chronic sinusitis, frontal bone trauma, cancer extirpation, or mucocele. The mucosa of the sinus is stripped and space obliterated with either autogenic, allopathic, or synthetic materials. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of autologous fat and hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) for frontal sinus obliteration. METHODS: A multidatabase systematic review was conducted to collect outcomes on frontal sinus obliterations with either autologous fat or HAC. Outcomes collected included infection of the frontal sinus or obliteration material, mucocele formation, skin infection at the operative site, hematoma or seroma, cosmetic defect, donor site infection, and need for revision procedure. Prevalence of outcomes was analyzed through meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: Twenty studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Sixteen studies reported outcomes for 667 patients obliterated with autologous fat, and 7 studies reported outcomes for 100 patients obliterated with HAC. Prevalence of infection of the frontal sinus or obliteration material, mucocele formation, skin infection at the operative site, hematoma or seroma, and cosmetic defect did not differ statistically between the cohorts. Donor site infection secondary to fat harvesting for fat obliteration had a prevalence of <0.01. Revision rate was 0.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.8) for fat obliteration and 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.33) for HAC obliteration. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in the studied outcomes were detected between obliterations with autologous fat and HAC, suggesting that either is equally suitable and may be up to the surgeon's preference.

Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in Mandibular Fractures and Surgical Site Infection.

BACKGROUND: Compared with other facial fractures, mandibular fractures have the highest rate of postsurgical site infection. There is strong evidence to suggest that postoperative antibiotics do not reduce rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) regardless of duration. However, there are conflicting data in the literature regarding the role of prophylactic preoperative antibiotics in reducing rates of SSIs. This study reviews the rate of infections in patients who underwent mandibular fracture repair who received a course of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics compared with those who received no or 1 dose of perioperative antibiotics. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent mandibular fracture repair at Prisma Health Richland between 2014 and 2019 were included in the study. A retrospective cohort review was conducted to determine the rate of SSI, comparing 2 groups of patients who underwent mandibular fracture repair. Patients who received more than 1 dose of scheduled antibiotics before surgery were compared with those who did not receive any antibiotic treatment before surgery or received only a single dose of antibiotics within 1 hour of incision time (perioperative antibiotics). The primary outcome was the rate of SSI between the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: There were 183 patients who received more than 1 dose of scheduled antibiotics before surgery and 35 patients who received a single dose of perioperative antibiotics or did not receive any antibiotics. The rate of SSI was not significantly different in the preoperative prophylactic antibiotics group (29.3%) compared with the patients who received a single perioperative dose or no antibiotics (25.0%). CONCLUSION: Extended regimens of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics beyond a single dose at time of surgery do not reduce SSIs after surgical repair in mandibular fractures.

Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair with Dermal Autograft within a Morel-Lavallée Lesion.

Morel-Lavallée lesions and traumatic abdominal wall hernias seldom present together and have no standardized guidelines for treatment. We present a unique case of a traumatic abdominal wall hernia present within a patient's abdominal Morel-Lavallée lesion, which was reduced and repaired with a dermal autograft. This is a novel approach to repairing a rare and unusual injury. The literature suggests that tension-free repairs with mesh should be used on delayed repairs of traumatic abdominal wall hernias. However, some advocate for primary repairs due to an up to 50% increased risk of wound infection in these injuries, even without the use of mesh. Although infection rates with the use of biologic mesh (acellular dermal matrices) in a contaminated field are lower than that of synthetic mesh, infections still occur and tend to be higher in repairs without mesh. The lack of foreign material and innate immunogenicity of the patient's own dermis may theoretically decrease the risk of infection compared with other commercially-available and biologically-derived products. The patient is a 47-year-old woman who was in a motor vehicle accident with prolonged extrication time. She was hospitalized for approximately 6 months due to extensive injuries, but had no further complications from her Morel-Lavallée lesion or repair of her traumatic abdominal wall hernia with her own dermis.

The Impact of Palatal Fistulae on the Success of Alveolar Bone Grafting.

ABSTRACT: Palatal fistulae are common complications of cleft palate surgery with a frequency of 5% to 29% and are challenging to repair. Optimal timing to repair palatal fistulae, in a staged fashion before alveolar bone grafting, or at the same time, still remains controversial. The primary aim of this study is to compare outcomes of 2 groups with regard to successful alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate and palatal fistulae. We describe a review of 85 consecutive patients identified as undergoing bone grafting from a single institution craniofacial team during 2003 to 2018. Twenty-eight required palatal fistula repair. All patients had a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Patients with cleft lip and palate repairs were stratified based on preoperative or simultaneous palatal fistula repair. Panoramic radiographs were reviewed by 2 physicians to evaluate success of bone grafting. Comparison between cohorts was made by statistical analysis. Of the 28 that required palatal fistula repair, 15 (53.6%) patients underwent prebone grafting palatal fistula repair and 13 (46.4%) patients underwent simultaneous bone grafting with palatal fistula repair. Mean age at time of bone grafting and palatal fistula repair were 10.60 years old and 9.39 years old, respectively. Length to follow-up was 54.82 months. The average height of the healed alveolar cleft site for patients in the prebone grafting or simultaneous groups was 10.57 mm and 11.46 mm, respectively. Patients who underwent palatal fistula repair and simultaneous bone grafting had similar outcomes as those with palatal fistula repair preoperatively.

Frontal Sinus Fracture Management Meta-analysis: Endoscopic Versus Open Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Frontal sinus fracture management continues to be a point of controversy. Many systematic reviews have been done, but meta-analyses comparing various approaches to frontal sinus fractures are scarce. Our study focuses on open surgical repair versus endoscopic repair of frontal sinus fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify prospective RCTs, non-RCTs, guidelines, case-control, and observational studies published in English before April 2019. Search terms included (1) frontal sinus, (2) skull fractures, (3) frontal bone, alone or in combination. An in-depth review was conducted to identify publications relevant to this analysis. Studies that included pediatric patients, case reports, and review articles without original data were excluded. Postoperative outcomes included were cosmesis, sinus function, mucocele, sinusitis, cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, and brain abscess. Meta-analysis of proportions, Fisher exact test, and relative risks were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The assessment of heterogeneity indicated that the studies are comparable. The weighted outcome proportions of patients with postoperative cosmetic deformity and mucocele are found to be significantly higher in patients who underwent open repair compared to patients who received endoscopic treatment. No significant difference between the 2 intervention groups in regards to the other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Based on this meta-analysis, no definitive conclusions regarding superiority of one approach over the other can be made. There are currently no universally accepted algorithms that aid in the decision to proceed with either approach. It is likely that these 2 techniques will come to serve different roles in treatment, as they can each be utilized to achieve different goals. At this time, the only recommendation is to proceed with whichever technique can be safely performed based upon surgeon experience and fracture pattern.