In vitro Development of Zona Pellucida-free Porcine Zygotes Cultured Individually after Vitrification.

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of zona pellucida (ZP)-free embryos provides more options for somatic cell nuclear transfer, particularly during handmade cloning. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether the removal of the ZP affects the development of porcine zygotes after vitrification and warming. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the appropriate volume of the corresponding medium for the individual culture of ZP-intact and -free embryos and evaluated the protection effect of ZP during cryopreservation on the resulting development of the vitrified-warmed zygotes. RESULTS: The volume of culture medium influenced the development of ZP-intact zygotes, and a volume of 15 µL was most suitable for their development. However, the volume of culture medium did not modify the development of ZP-free zygotes. The removal of the ZP before vitrification did not adversely affect embryonic development or quality of the resulting blastocysts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the removal of the ZP does not cause detrimental effects to the development of vitrified-warmed zygotes.

The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.

Previous research has indicated that decision making is accompanied by an increase in the coherence of assessments of the factors related to the decision alternatives. In the present study, the authors investigated whether this coherence shift is obtained before people commit to a decision, and whether it is obtained in the course of a number of other processing tasks. College students were presented with a complex legal case involving multiple conflicting arguments. Participants rated agreement with the individual arguments in isolation before seeing the case and after processing it under various initial sets, including playing the role of a judge assigned to decide the case. Coherence shifts were observed when participants were instructed to delay making the decision (Experiment 1), to memorize the case (Experiment 2), and to comprehend the case (Experiment 3). The findings support the hypothesis that a coherence-generating mechanism operates in a variety of processing tasks, including decision making.