Validation of the Reveal® 3-D for Gluten Assay for Detection of Gluten in Clean-in-Place Rinses and Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 122201.

BACKGROUND: Reveal® 3-D for Gluten is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative detection of gluten in environmental samples. The test uses monoclonal antibodies reactive to prolamins in wheat. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate the Reveal 3-D test for detection of gluten in clean-in-place rinse and swabs from a stainless steel surface. METHODS: Elements of the study included food selectivity and interference testing, matrix testing, an assay robustness study, and reagent stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing. Wheat flour was used as the spiking material for all matrixes. RESULTS: In selectivity and interference testing, nine target matrixes all tested positive and 36 of 39 non-target matrixes tested negative. Almond flour, sesame flour, and cornstarch produced positive results as 100% commodities; reactivity can be eliminated with dilution or by testing without use of food extraction buffer, which is not a standard part of the environmental testing method. With a gluten spike at 9.3 mg/kg, chestnut flour, guar gum, and xanthan gum as 100% commodities inhibited the ability of the assay to detect gluten when tested without dilution. In quaternary ammonium clean-in-place rinse and swabs from stainless steel, 100% positive results were obtained at levels of 2.8 mg/kg and 4.7 µg/100 cm2, respectively. Results of independent laboratory testing of swabs from stainless steel supported those of internal trials. Robustness testing showed that introducing variations to three operating parameters simultaneously had no adverse effect on assay performance. In the reagent stability study, data supported kit expiration dating of 11 months. CONCLUSION: Results of the current study show that the Reveal test is an accurate and reliable method for qualitative detection of gluten in select clean-in-place rinse and environmental samples. HIGHLIGHTS: The Reveal test was able to detect gluten at levels of 2.8 ppm in clean-in-place rinse and 4.7 µg/100 cm2 in swabs from stainless steel.

Validation of the Soleris® Coliform Method for Detection of Coliform Bacteria in Dried Cannabis Flower: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 010302.

BACKGROUND: The Soleris® Coliform Vial is a growth-based, automated method for detection of coliform bacteria in foods and other consumer products such as nutraceuticals and cosmetics. The method was granted AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM certification for select foods after successful completion of a validation study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to validate the Soleris coliform method for use with dried cannabis flower (>0.3% delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol). METHODS: A comparative matrix study was performed in which naturally contaminated dried cannabis flower was tested with the Soleris coliform method and with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual solid medium method. Multiple lots of dried cannabis flower were obtained, pre-screened for coliforms, and blended to produce test materials at four different contamination levels ranging from 4.5 to 1600 CFU/g. Each material was tested at three different Soleris detection threshold levels determined by the dilution used to inoculate the Soleris vials. Probability of detection analysis was performed to determine if differences in the number of positive results obtained with the two methods were significant. RESULTS: For all four dried cannabis flower materials, at all three Soleris test thresholds, there were no significant differences in the number of positive results obtained with the Soleris and cultural plating methods as determined by probability of detection analysis at P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The Soleris coliform test is an accurate method for detection of coliform bacteria in dried cannabis flower. HIGHLIGHTS: The Soleris coliform method provides cannabis industry QC personnel with an effective method for analysis of dried cannabis flower and produces results in 18-24 h.

Validation of the Soleris® NF-TVC Method for Detection of Aerobic, Mesophilic Microorganisms in Dried Cannabis Flower: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 071203.

BACKGROUND: Soleris® Non-Fermenting Total Viable Count (NF-TVC) is a growth-based, automated method for semiquantitative detection of aerobic, mesophilic microorganisms in foods and other consumer products such as nutraceuticals and cosmetics. The method was granted AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM status for select foods after successful completion of a validation study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to validate the Soleris NF-TVC method for use with dried cannabis flower [>0.3% delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)]. METHODS: The validation consisted of a comparative matrix study in which naturally contaminated dried cannabis flower was tested with the Soleris NF-TVC method and with the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM  966.23 dilution plating method. Multiple lots of dried cannabis flower were obtained, pre-screened for total aerobic, mesophilic viable count levels, and blended to produce test materials at four different levels of contamination ranging from 1.0 × 103 to 2.2 × 105 CFU/g. Each material was tested at three different Soleris detection threshold levels determined by the dilution used to inoculate the Soleris vials. Probability of detection analysis was performed to determine if differences in the number of positive results obtained with the two methods were significant. RESULTS: For all four dried cannabis flower materials, at all three Soleris test thresholds, there were no significant differences in performance comparing the Soleris and reference dilution plating methods as determined by probability of detection analysis at P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the Soleris NF-TVC method is an accurate and effective method for detection of aerobic, mesophilic microorganisms in dried cannabis flower. HIGHLIGHTS: The Soleris NF-TVC method provides cannabis industry quality control personnel with an effective method for analysis of dried cannabis flower and produces results in 24-48 h.

Validation of the Soleris®Enterobacteriaceae Method for Detection of Enterobacteriaceae in Dried Cannabis Flower: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 121901.

BACKGROUND: The Soleris®Enterobacteriaceae vial is a growth-based, automated method for detection of bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae in foods and other sample types including nutraceuticals and cosmetics. The Soleris method is used in a "dilute-to-specification" or threshold manner, in which a result is scored as positive or negative around a predetermined cutoff (in CFU/g) established by the dilution and volume of sample homogenate tested. The Soleris method was granted AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) status for select foods after successful completion of a validation study (PTM 121901). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the method for the detection of Enterobacteriaceae in dried cannabis flower [>0.3% delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)]. METHODS: The matrix study included comparison of Soleris method presumptive results to confirmation from the Soleris vials, and comparison of the Soleris confirmed results to those of the ISO 21528-2:2017 colony count method. Test materials at four different levels of contamination ranging from 7.8 to 3500 CFU/g were tested at three dilutions, corresponding to test thresholds. RESULTS: Probability of detection analysis at P < 0.05 showed there were no significant differences between Soleris presumptive and confirmed results, and no significant differences between Soleris confirmed and ISO 21528-2:2017 results. CONCLUSION: The results provided evidence that the Soleris Enterobacteriaceae test is an accurate method for detection of Enterobacteriaceae in dried cannabis flower. HIGHLIGHTS: The Soleris Enterobacteriaceae method provides cannabis industry QC personnel with an effective method for analysis of dried cannabis flower and produces results in 20-24 h.

Emergency Response Validation of the Soleris® Direct Yeast and Mold Method for Detection of Yeast and Mold in Dried Cannabis Flower: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 051301.

BACKGROUND: Soleris® Direct Yeast and Mold (DYM) is a growth-based, automated method for detection of yeast and mold in select foods and other sample types including nutraceuticals and cosmetics. The Soleris method is used in a "dilute-to-specification" or threshold manner in which a result is scored as positive or negative around a predetermined cutoff (in CFU/g) established by the dilution and volume of sample homogenate tested. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the method for testing of dried cannabis flower. The validation was conducted under the Emergency Response Validation program of the AOAC Research Institute. METHOD: The study included inclusivity and exclusivity testing, in particular testing of yeast and mold species associated with cannabis, and a matrix study in which Soleris method presumptive results were compared with Soleris confirmed results using Dichloran Rose-Bengal Chloramphenicol (DRBC) agar for confirmation. Samples at four different levels of natural yeast and mold contamination were tested at two test thresholds. RESULTS: In inclusivity testing, all 63 yeast and mold strains tested produced positive results within the specified test duration of 72 h. In exclusivity testing, 36 of 37 strains tested produced no detection within 72 h. In matrix testing, there were no significant differences between Soleris presumptive and confirmed results for any contamination level or test threshold as determined by probability of detection analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the Soleris method is an effective procedure for detection of yeast and mold in dried cannabis flower. HIGHLIGHTS: With the Soleris method, results are available within 72 h compared with the 5-7 days required for microbiological culture methods.

Validation of Modifications to the Soleris®E. coli Method for Detection and Threshold Determination of Escherichia coli in Select Foods: Level 3 Modification to AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 101101.

BACKGROUND: Soleris®E. coli is an automated, growth-based method for detection and semi-quantitative determination of Escherichia coli in foods. The method can be used in dilute-to-specification (threshold) or presence/absence modes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate four modifications to the method: (1) a change in the vial detection window plug composition from agar to agarose to improve plug consistency and robustness, (2) a change in pre-enrichment incubation time for presence/absence testing from 6 h to 18-24 h, (3) a change in vial incubation temperature from 44.5 to 43.5°C, and (4) incorporation of a simple direct-from-vial confirmation test as an alternative to traditional procedures. METHODS: Elements of the study included inclusivity/exclusivity testing, matrix testing in comparison to the ISO 7251:2005 reference method, reagent stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing, and an independent laboratory study. RESULTS: In inclusivity testing, all 55 Escherichia coli strains tested produced positive results. In exclusivity testing, 30 of 31 strains of other bacterial species produced negative results, the sole exception being a strain of Enterobacter cloacae. In internal and independent laboratory matrix testing of mozzarella cheese, condensed milk, pasteurized liquid egg, and frozen green beans, results showed no significant differences in performance of the Soleris and reference methods with two exceptions, one in which the Soleris method produced more positive results, and one in which the reference method produced more positive results. CONCLUSION: Performance characteristics of the modified Soleris E. coli method are consistent with those of the original validated method. HIGHLIGHTS: The Soleris E. coli method offers improvements in ease of use and reagent robustness.

Validation of the One Broth One Plate for Salmonella Method for Detection of Salmonella Spp. in Select Food and Environmental Samples: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 102002.

BACKGROUND: One Broth One Plate for Salmonella (OBOP Salmonella) is a rapid and simple method for detection of Salmonella spp. in food and environmental samples using traditional culture methodology. The method utilizes single-step enrichment followed by plating to a selective/differential, chromogenic agar. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the validation study was to measure the effectiveness of the OBOP Salmonella method in comparison to reference culture procedures. METHOD: Performance of the OBOP Salmonella method was compared to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 5 reference method for queso fresco, smoked salmon, cantaloupe, chocolate, black pepper, chili powder, dry pet food, and sponge samples from a stainless steel surface, or to that of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Chapter 4.10 method for raw ground turkey, chicken carcass rinse, and pasteurized liquid egg. Inclusivity/exclusivity, robustness, and stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing was also performed. RESULTS: In the matrix study, there were no statistically significant differences in performance between the OBOP Salmonella and reference methods, as determined by probability of detection analysis (P < 0.05), for any of the matrixes examined. All 104 Salmonella spp. strains produced positive results in inclusivity testing, and all 33 non-salmonellae exclusivity strains tested negative with the OBOP Salmonella method. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the validation study show that the OBOP Salmonella method is a reliable procedure for detection of Salmonella spp. in select matrixes. The method is simple to perform, requires no specialized equipment, and produces results in as little as 37 h. HIGHLIGHTS: The OBOP Salmonella method was awarded AOAC PTMSM (#102002) for detection of Salmonella in queso fresco, smoked salmon, cantaloupe, chocolate, black pepper, chili powder, dry pet food, sponge samples on a stainless steel surface, raw ground turkey, chicken carcass rinse, and pasteurized liquid egg. The method is also approved by MicroVal® for a broad range of foods under certification number 2019LR88.

Validation of the Reveal® 3-D for Peanut Lateral Flow Test: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 111901.

BACKGROUND: Reveal® 3-D for Peanut is an immunochromatographic, lateral flow test for qualitative detection of peanut residue in food manufacturing and food preparation settings. The test can detect low ppm levels of peanut in clean-in-place (CIP) rinses and in swabs from environmental surfaces and can serve as a tool in managing allergen risk. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate the lateral flow method for detection of peanut in CIP rinses, specifically water, peroxyacetic acid/hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium compound rinses, and in swabs taken from stainless steel and plastic surfaces. METHODS: CIP rinses spiked with low levels of peanut were tested, as were surfaces inoculated with peanut. Specificity and assay interference were assessed in testing of food commodities with and without added peanut. Assay robustness and test kit stability and consistency testing were also performed. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that the lateral flow test can detect peanut in CIP rinses in the range of 2-4 ppm and in environmental surface swabs in the range of 3-4 µg/100 cm2. Results of specificity testing with 29 common food items showed lack of cross-reactivity, and potential assay interference only from walnut. Data from stability trials supports expiration dating for the kit of up to 23 months post-manufacture. CONCLUSIONS AND HIGHLIGHTS: The lateral flow test is a sensitive, specific, and rapid method for detection of low levels of peanut residue in CIP rinses and environmental samples and can be an important component in a comprehensive allergen risk management program.

Reveal Q+ MAX® for Detection of Total Af latoxin in Corn, Almonds, Pistachios, Walnuts, and Peanuts.

Background: The Reveal Q+ MAX for Aflatoxin is a lateral flow immunochromatographic test intended for quantitative analysis within 6 min after aqueous extraction. Objective: Work was conducted to validate the performance of the Reveal Q+ MAX for Aflatoxin method in selected corn and nut matrixes. Methods: This method was validated under the requirements of the AOAC Research Institute Performance Tested MethodSM program. Five matrixes, including corn naturally contaminated with aflatoxin at 0, 5.2, 21.0, 51.6, 103.6, and 282 ppb as well as peanuts, pistachios, walnuts, and almonds spiked at 0, 5, 20, 50, and 300 ppb were analyzed. Results: Average percentage recoveries of the added aflatoxin from the matrixes ranged from 80.8 to 116.9%. Average LOD for all matrixes is 2 ppb and LOQ is 7 ppb. With the exception of sample size for almonds, robustness trials demonstrated that deliberate changes to the assay parameters minimally affected the Reveal Q+ MAX assay performance. Finally, stability results from three independently manufactured lots support Reveal Q+ MAX for Aflatoxin performance consistency and shelf-life of 18 months when stored at room temperature. Conclusions: This study appropriately validates the Performance Tested MethodSM claim for corn and selected nut matrixes on Reveal Q+ MAX for Aflatoxin, an aqueous lateral flow test kit. Highlights: Aqueous lateral flow test kit detects total aflatoxin between 80 to 120% yield with an LOD of 2 ppb.

Validation of the Listeria Right NowTM Test for Detection of Listeria spp. from Selected Environmental Surfaces Without Enrichment.

Background: Listeria Right NowTM is a novel, enrichment-free molecular method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from environmental surfaces. The test provides results in real time, indicating the current or recent presence of Listeria spp. in the environment. After sampling, the entire contents of the swab are subject to sample processing, releasing large quantities of target ribosomal RNA molecules into the lysate. A portion of the lysate is then tested using the ANSR® for Listeria isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay. Objective: A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate the method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces. Methods and Results: In inclusivity testing, 60 of 60 Listeria spp. strains tested positive. In exclusivity testing, 31 of 31 nontarget bacterial strains tested negative. In LOD testing, the test was able to detect as few as 2 CFU of L. monocytogenes applied to a stainless steel surface. In matrix testing of inoculated stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces, there were no statistically significant differences in method performance comparing the Listeria Right Now and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedures as determined by probability of detection analysis. In robustness testing, modest changes to three assay operating parameters simultaneously did not significantly affect performance of the test. Conclusions and Highlights: Results can be obtained in less than 1 h using the Listeria Right Now test, allowing food industry personnel to take immediate corrective action in the case of Listeria contamination incidents.

Factors associated with a low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay in urban and semi-rural areas of southern Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding risk factors associated with suboptimal breastfeeding practices in urbanized areas of low-middle income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Through a large prospective birth cohort, which enrolled 6706 infants in Vietnam between 2009 and 2013, we investigated the practice of exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay in urban and semi-rural populations and aimed to identify factors associated with suboptimal breastfeeding practices. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine factors associated with not exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 6076 mothers, 33% (2187) breastfed their infant exclusively before hospital discharge; 9% (364/4248) in urban and 74% (1823/2458) in semi-rural areas. Exclusive breastfeeding up to 4 months was recorded in 15% (959/6210) of participants; this declined to < 1% (56/6093) at 6 months. Delivery by Caesarean section (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.07; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.04, 0.11 and OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.03, 0.08) and neonatal complications (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.07, 0.47 and OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.14, 0.46) were common and highly significant risk factors associated with a lack of exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay in urban and semi-rural settings, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale investigation aimed at identifying factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay in Vietnam. Breastfeeding promotion strategies should prioritize common risk factors in hospital, such as Caesarean section and neonatal complications, and other location specific factors associated with socioeconomics.

Validation of a Modified ANSR® for E. coli O157:H7 Method for Detection of E. coli O157:H7 in Select Foods.

Background: The ANSR method is based on isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology. The modifications to assay components improve sensitivity of the assay and robustness of the internal positive control. Objective: A Performance Tested MethodSM validation study was conducted to assess performance of a modified version of the ANSR® for Escherichia coli O157:H7 method. Methods: The validation study included inclusivity/exclusivity, matrix, robustness, accelerated stability, and independent laboratory testing. Results: In inclusivity testing of 55 strains of E. coli O157:H7 and E. coli O157:NM variants, all strains produced positive results. In exclusivity testing of 41 strains including E. coli of other serotypes and bacteria of closely related genera, all strains produced negative results. In matrix testing of beef trim, raw ground beef, spinach, and sprout-irrigation water, ANSR method performance was compared with that of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedures. Conclusions: all trials, ANSR method performance was not statistically different from that of the reference methods. Results of independent laboratory testing of ground beef corroborated those of internal testing. Introducing modest changes to three assay operating parameters did not materially affect ANSR method performance. Finally, accelerated stability testing results of three independently manufactured lots of ANSR reagents support a shelf-life of 1 year when stored at 2-8°C.

Validation of the ANSR® for Campylobacter Method for Detection of Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in Chicken Carcass Rinse and Turkey Sponge Samples.

A performance validation of the ANSR® for Campylobacter method was conducted in selected matrixes. This assay used selective nicking enzyme amplification technology to amplify target genes. Samples were enriched for 20 to 24 h and then lysed. The assay was completed within 50 min using real-time detection in a combination incubator/fluorescence detector and software. When 50 distinct strains of Campylobacter jejuni, C. lari, or C. coli were tested for inclusivity, all 50 strains produced positive results. In exclusivity testing, 31 strains of related organisms, including seven nontarget Campylobacter strains and other common species, were evaluated. All 31 species generated negative ANSR assay results, including the nontarget Campylobacter strains. The ANSR for Campylobacter method was compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference method using naturally contaminated chicken carcass rinse or turkey carcass sponge samples. ANSR method performance was not statistically different from the reference method using two different enrichment options. Equivalent results were observed at both time points (20 and 24 h) and in both atmospheres (microaerobic and aerobic) to reference methods. Method performance with chicken carcass rinse was confirmed in an independent laboratory study. Additionally, in robustness testing, small, deliberate changes to the assay parameters minimally affected ANSR method performance. Finally, accelerated stability results from three independently manufactured lots supported a shelf life of 6 months when stored at 4°C. The ANSR assay offered greater efficiency and flexibility when compared to the reference method with a 20-24 h single-step enrichment in a microaerobic or an aerobic atmosphere.

Validation of the ANSR(®) E. coli O157:H7 Method for Detection of E. coli O157:H7.

A performance validation of the ANSR(®) for E. coli O157:H7 method was conducted in selected food matrixes. This assay uses selective nicking enzyme amplification technology to amplify target genes. Samples are enriched for 12-24 h and then lysed. The assay is completed within 40 min using real-time detection in a combination incubator/fluorescence detector and software. When 44 distinct strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and 6 strains of E. coli O157:NM were tested for inclusivity, all 50 strains produced positive results. In exclusivity testing, 57 strains representing 33 species of closely related Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, including 11 non-H7 O157 strains and shiga toxin-producing E. coli other than O157:H7, were evaluated. All 57 nontarget strains generated negative ANSR assay results. Using 80% lean ground beef and beef trim (approximately 20% fat), ANSR method performance was compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure. ANSR performance with baby spinach and sprout irrigation water was measured against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference method. ANSR method performance was not statistically different to that of the reference methods using two different enrichment options. For ground beef and beef trim, the standard enrichment in modified Tryptone Soya Broth can be analyzed using the ANSR assay with a 1:10 dilution of the enrichment in phosphate-buffered saline and produces equivalent results to the reference method. Additionally, in most matrixes tested (exception is spinach which required 24 h enrichment) the assay offers great efficiency and flexibility over the reference method with a 12-24 h single-step enrichment. Equivalent results were observed at both time points (12 and 24 h) to reference methods. Small changes to the assay parameters minimally affected ANSR method performance. Finally, accelerated stability results from three independently manufactured lots support a shelf-life of 6 months when stored at 4°C.

Validation of the Reveal(®) 2.0 Group D1 Salmonella Test for Detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in Raw Shell Eggs and Poultry-Associated Matrixes.

A study was conducted to assess the performance of the Reveal(®) 2.0 Group D1 Salmonella lateral flow immunoassay for use in detection of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in raw shell eggs and poultry-associated matrixes, including chicken carcass rinse and poultry feed. In inclusivity testing, the Reveal 2.0 test detected all 37 strains of SE tested. The test also detected all but one of 18 non-Enteritidis somatic group D1 Salmonella serovars examined. In exclusivity testing, none of 42 strains tested was detected. The exclusivity panel included Salmonella strains of somatic groups other than D1, as well as strains of other genera of Gram-negative bacteria. In matrix testing, performance of the Reveal 2.0 test was compared to that of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for chicken carcass rinse and to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual for raw shell eggs and poultry feed. For all matrixes evaluated, there were no significant differences in the ability to detect SE when comparing the Reveal 2.0 method and the appropriate reference culture procedure as determined by probability of detection statistical analysis. The ability of the Reveal 2.0 test to withstand modest perturbations to normal operating parameters was examined in robustness experiments. Results showed that the test can withstand deviations in up to three operating parameters simultaneously without significantly affecting performance. Real-time stability testing of multiple lots of Reveal 2.0 devices established the shelf life of the test device at 16 months postmanufacture.

Validation of Modifications to the ANSR(®) Listeria Method for Improved Ease of Use and Performance.

A study was conducted to validate minor reagent formulation, enrichment, and procedural changes to the ANSR(®) Listeria method, Performance-Tested Method(SM) 101202. In order to improve ease of use and diminish risk of amplicon contamination, the lyophilized reagent components were reformulated for increased solubility, thus eliminating the need to mix by pipetting. In the alternative procedure, an aliquot of the lysate is added to lyophilized ANSR reagents, immediately capped, and briefly mixed by vortexing. When three foods (hot dogs, Mexican-style cheese, and cantaloupe) and sponge samples taken from a stainless steel surface were tested, significant differences in performance between the ANSR and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual or U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedures were seen with hot dogs and Mexican-style cheese after 16 h enrichment, with the reference methods producing more positive results. After 24 h enrichment, however, there were no significant differences in method performance for any of the four matrixes tested. Robustness testing was also conducted, with variations to lysis buffer volume, lysis time, and sample volume having no demonstrable effect on assay results. Accelerated stability testing was carried out over a 10-week period and showed no diminishment in assay performance. A second phase of the study examined performance of the ANSR assay following enrichment in a new medium, LESS Plus broth, designed for use with all food and environmental sample types. With the alternative LESS Plus broth, there were no significant differences in performance between the ANSR method and the reference culture procedures for any of the matrixes tested after either 16 or 24 h enrichment, although 24 h enrichment is recommended for hot dogs due to higher sensitivity. Results of inclusivity and exclusivity testing using LESS Plus broth showed that the ANSR assay is highly specific, with 100% expected results for target and nontarget bacteria.

Validation of the ANSR(®) Listeria monocytogenes Method for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Selected Food and Environmental Samples.

Work was conducted to validate performance of the ANSR(®) for Listeria monocytogenes method in selected food and environmental matrixes. This DNA-based assay involves amplification of nucleic acid via an isothermal reaction based on nicking enzyme amplification technology. Following single-step sample enrichment for 16-24 h for most matrixes, the assay is completed in 40 min using only simple instrumentation. When 50 distinct strains of L. monocytogenes were tested for inclusivity, 48 produced positive results, the exceptions being two strains confirmed by PCR to lack the assay target gene. Forty-seven nontarget strains (30 species), including multiple non-monocytogenes Listeria species as well as non-Listeria, Gram-positive bacteria, were tested, and all generated negative ANSR assay results. Performance of the ANSR method was compared with that of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for detection of L. monocytogenes in hot dogs, pasteurized liquid egg, and sponge samples taken from an inoculated stainless steel surface. In addition, ANSR performance was measured against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference method for detection of L. monocytogenes in Mexican-style cheese, cantaloupe, sprout irrigation water, and guacamole. With the single exception of pasteurized liquid egg at 16 h, ANSR method performance as quantified by the number of positives obtained was not statistically different from that of the reference methods. Robustness trials demonstrated that deliberate introduction of small deviations to the normal assay parameters did not affect ANSR method performance. Results of accelerated stability testing conducted using two manufactured lots of reagents predicts stability at the specified storage temperature of 4°C of more than 1 year.

Validation of the NeoFilm for Yeast and Mold Method for Enumeration of Yeasts and Molds in Select Foods.

NeoFilm Yeast and Mold (Y&M), also known as Sanita-kun Yeasts and Molds, is a simple, effective device used for the enumeration of yeasts and molds. It consists of a nonwoven fabric on which a layer of microbial nutrients is deposited in a film. A 1 mL sample homogenate is applied to the membrane and this, in turn, is incubated for 48-72 h at 25°C. Sample homogenates were prepared using two different diluents for customer convenience: phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and 0.1% peptone water. In comparative testing of breaded chicken nuggets, dry pet food, orange juice concentrate, yogurt, and cake mix, there were statistically significant differences in the counts obtained by the NeoFilm Y&M and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture methods only in the following instances: medium level for orange juice with PBS as diluent and low level for pet food with 0.1% peptone water as diluent, where reference method counts were higher than those of NeoFilm; medium level for cake mix with PBS, and low and medium levels for cake mix with 0.1% peptone water, where NeoFilm produced higher counts than the reference method. In addition to the method comparison study with five matrixes, robustness and stability/lot-to-lot testing were also performed. Results of robustness testing showed no significant effect on results even with perturbation to three assay parameters simultaneously. Results of testing of three lots of devices ranging in age from 2 to 26 months post-manufacture showed no significant differences in performance.