ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) might be associated with the risk of cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between T2DM and the risk of developing common cancers in a Chinese population. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was carried out in the Nan-Hu district of Jiaxing city, Zhejiang province, China. The incidence of cancer cases among type 2 diabetic patients were identified through record-linkage of the Diabetic Surveillance and Registry Database with the Cancer Database from January 2002 to June 2008. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for the risk of cancer among the patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: The overall incidence of cancer was 1083.6 per 10(5) subjects in male T2DM patients and 870.2 per 105 in females. Increased risk of developing cancer was found in both male and female T2DM patients with an SIR of 1.331 (95% CI = 1.143-1.518) and 1.737 (1.478-1.997), respectively. As for cancer subtypes, both male and female T2DM patients had a significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer with the SIRs of 2.973 (1.73-4.21) and 2.687 (1.445-3.928), respectively. Elevated risk of liver and kidney cancers was only found in male T2DM patients with SIRs of 1.538 (1.005-2.072) and 4.091 (1.418-6.764), respectively. Increased risks of developing breast cancer [2.209 (1.487-2.93)] and leukemia SIR: [4.167 (1.584- 6.749) ] were found in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that patients with T2DM have an increased risk of developing cancer. Additional cancer screening should be employed in the management of patients with T2DM.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , China/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Population Surveillance , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Neonatal septicemia is a common and severe infection, which often results in death. Early diagnosis and treatment of neonatal septicemia may help decrease neonatal mortality. Recently, many studies sought to explore the possibility of early diagnosis of this disease. The high affinity Fcgamma-receptor I (CD(64)) was purposefully chosen as a potential marker for identifying neonatal septicemia. The present study was designed to evaluate neutrophil CD(64) level for early diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. METHODS: Eighty-nine suspected neonatal septicemia cases were recruited into the study. Five non-specific indices, i.e., C-reactive protein (CRP), micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mESR), white blood cell count, platelet count and the ratio of immature neutrophil count to total neutrophil count were measured for each patient. The patients were divided into septicemia group (n = 39) and non-septisemic infection group (n = 50) according to the diagnostic criteria for neonatal septicemia. Nineteen hospitalized neonates with non-infectious diseases were enrolled as controls (n = 19). The levels of peripheral blood neutrophil CD(64) were measured by using flow cytometry. The positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CD(64) were calculated. RESULTS: The levels of peripheral blood neutrophil CD(64) in septicemia patients were (75.6 +/- 8.9)%, which were significantly higher than those of non-septisemic infection group (29.1 +/- 6.2)% and control group (5.1 +/- 1.1)% (P < 0.05), respectively. There were no significant differences in the levels of CD(64) expression between the patients with Gram-negative (79.5 +/- 3.5)% and Gram- positive (76.4 +/- 5.0)% (P > 0.05) bacterial infection. The levels of CD(64) of the cases with septicemia significantly decreased at day 10 of treatment with antibiotics. The detection of CD(64) (cutoff value > 30%) for suspected septicemia showed high sensitivity (97.4%), specificity (84.0%), PPV (82.6%), and NPV (97.6%). The positive rate of CD(64) detection (62.9%) was much higher than that of the blood culture test (19.1%) and that of the five nonspecific indices (29.2%, P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The expression of CD(64) increased in neonatal septicemia cases. The measurement of cell surface expression of CD(64) on neutrophils may be helpful to early diagnosis, evaluation of severity of infection and observation of therapeutic effects for neonatal septicemia.
