Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 47(3): 230-235, 2024 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207963

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is one of the main reasons for digestive admissions. Adequate pain treatment is crucial in its management. However, there are hardly any descriptions of the analgesic guidelines used in our setting. METHODS: On-line survey on analgesic management in acute pancreatitis, aimed at attending physicians and residents practising in Spain. RESULTS: Two hundred and nine physicians from 88 centres responded to the survey. Ninety percent were specialists in gastrointestinal medicine and 69% worked in a tertiary centre. The majority (64.4%) do not routinely use scales to measure pain. When choosing a drug, experience in its use was the most important factor. The most commonly prescribed initial treatments are: combination of paracetamol and metamizole (53.5%), paracetamol alone (19.1%) and metamizole alone (17.4%). As rescue: meperidine (54.8%), tramadol (17.8%), morphine chloride (17.8%) and metamizole (11.5%). Continuous perfusion is used in 8.2% of initial treatments. Physicians with >10 years of service use more metamizole as monotherapy (50%), while residents and attending physicians with <10 years of service prescribe it in combination with paracetamol (85%). If progression is needed, morphine chloride and meperidine are mainly used. The speciality of the respondent, the size of the work centre and the unit/service where the patients were admitted did not influence the analgesia prescribed. Satisfaction with pain management reached 7.8/10 (SD 0.98). CONCLUSION: In our setting, metamizole and paracetamol are the most commonly used analgesics as initial pain treatment in acute pancreatitis, and meperidine is the most commonly used rescue analgesic.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Pancreatitis , Humans , Pain Management , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Dipyrone/therapeutic use , Morphine , Acute Disease , Pancreatitis/drug therapy , Pain , Meperidine/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(5): 293-294, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470445

ABSTRACT

A 54-year-old male with a medical history of diabetes mellitus type 2 and tonsil cancer treated with radiochemotherapy years previously was admitted to hospital due to one-month progressive diarrhea, epigastric pain and 14-kg weight loss. Laboratory tests revealed mild anemia (Hb 10.8 g/dl). Upper endoscopy (UE) showed multiple ulcerated lesions with raised edges and a hard consistency on biopsy, being more evident at the duodenum and with a lower frequency and smaller diameter in the stomach.


Subject(s)
Burkitt Lymphoma , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Biopsy , Burkitt Lymphoma/complications , Burkitt Lymphoma/diagnostic imaging , Diarrhea/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 41(3): 175-190, mar. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171133

ABSTRACT

Este documento resume el contenido de la Guía de resección mucosa endoscópica elaborada por el grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (GSEED de Resección Endoscópica) y expone las recomendaciones sobre el manejo endoscópico de las lesiones neoplásicas colorrectales superficiales (AU)


This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/instrumentation , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics
5.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 110(3): 179-194, mar. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171520

ABSTRACT

Este documento resume el contenido de la Guía de resección mucosa endoscópica elaborada por el grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (GSEED de Resección Endoscópica) y expone las recomendaciones sobre el manejo endoscópico de las lesiones neoplásicas colorrectales superficiales (AU)


This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Peer Review , Patient Selection , Preoperative Care/methods , Colonoscopy/methods
6.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(3): 179-194, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29421912

ABSTRACT

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colorectal Surgery/standards , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/standards , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/standards , Humans , Rectal Diseases/surgery
7.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 41(3): 175-190, 2018 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29449039

ABSTRACT

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/standards , Humans
8.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 60(2): 143-145, mar.-abr. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-164056

ABSTRACT

La infección por el virus de la hepatitis E es una causa clásica de hepatitis fulminante en la gestación que puede acarrear graves consecuencias materno-fetales. Las complicaciones fetales se derivan fundamentalmente de la transmisión vertical durante la gestación o el parto (hipotermia, hipoglucemia, hepatitis aguda, necrosis masiva hepática) y de un aumento de la prematuridad que conllevaría una mayor mortalidad neonatal. La peritonitis meconial se ha descrito como complicación de la infección materno-fetal por parvovirus B19, citomegalovirus, rubeola, virus de la hepatitis A y virus de la hepatitis B, sin que hayan sido comunicados en la bibliografía casos secundarios a la infección por virus de la hepatitis E. Presentamos el caso de una gestante de 19 semanas que ingresa por un cuadro de hepatitis aguda E, con diagnóstico fetal ecográfico prenatal compatible con peritonitis meconial (AU)


Hepatitis E virus infection is a classical cause of fulminant hepatitis during pregnancy, which can lead to severe maternal and fetal complications. Fetal complications are mainly derived from the vertical transmission during pregnancy or delivery (hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, acute hepatitis, massive liver necrosis) and from and increase in prematurity that would lead on to a greater neonatal mortality. Meconium peritonitis has been described as a complication of maternal and fetal infection by parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, rubella, hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus. There have been no published cases relating meconium peritonitis and hepatitis E virus infection. We present the case of a 19 week pregnant woman admitted with an acute hepatitis E, with a fetal prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of meconium peritonitis (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Peritonitis/complications , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Hepatitis E/complications , Pregnancy Complications/physiopathology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Hepatitis E/transmission , Parvovirus B19, Human/isolation & purification , Parvovirus B19, Human/pathogenicity , Leukocytosis/complications , Leukocytosis/diagnosis , Hyperbilirubinemia/blood , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Ascites/diagnosis , Hyperbilirubinemia/complications
9.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 14(8): 1140-7, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27033428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: After endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal lesions, delayed bleeding is the most common serious complication, but there are no guidelines for its prevention. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with delayed bleeding that required medical attention after discharge until day 15 and develop a scoring system to identify patients at risk. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 1214 consecutive patients with nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 20 mm or larger treated by EMR (n = 1255) at 23 hospitals in Spain, from February 2013 through February 2015. Patients were examined 15 days after the procedure, and medical data were collected. We used the data to create a delayed bleeding scoring system, and assigned a weight to each risk factor based on the ß parameter from multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients were classified as being at low, average, or high risk for delayed bleeding. RESULTS: Delayed bleeding occurred in 46 cases (3.7%, 95% confidence interval, 2.7%-4.9%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with delayed bleeding included age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.36; P < .01), American Society of Anesthesiologist classification scores of III or IV (OR, 1.90; P ≤ .05), aspirin use during EMR (OR, 3.16; P < .05), right-sided lesions (OR, 4.86; P < .01), lesion size ≥40 mm (OR, 1.91; P ≤ .05), and a mucosal gap not closed by hemoclips (OR, 3.63; P ≤ .01). We developed a risk scoring system based on these 6 variables that assigned patients to the low-risk (score, 0-3), average-risk (score, 4-7), or high-risk (score, 8-10) categories with a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.83). In these groups, the probabilities of delayed bleeding were 0.6%, 5.5%, and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of delayed bleeding after EMR of large colorectal lesions is 3.7%. We developed a risk scoring system based on 6 factors that determined the risk for delayed bleeding (receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77). The factors most strongly associated with delayed bleeding were right-sided lesions, aspirin use, and mucosal defects not closed by hemoclips. Patients considered to be high risk (score, 8-10) had a 40% probability of delayed bleeding.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Spain , Young Adult
14.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 104(9): 452-7, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23130852

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with an increased risk of developing tumors. Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) usually require multiple imaging tests using this type of radiation. OBJECTIVES: the objectives of this study were to estimate the total dose of ionizing radiation received by patients with Crohn's disease during their course and to identify the factors associated with higher radiation doses. METHODS: two hundred thirty-five CD patients diagnosed between 1972 and 2010 were included. The effective dose (ED) received by each patient was calculated retrospectively based on the number of gastrointestinal transit studies and computed tomography scans performed. Considering recent epidemiological studies, an ED greater than or equal to 50 mSv was used as the cut-off point for increased risk of developing cancer. RESULTS: the mean ED received per patient was 33.4 mSv (95% CI 29.3-37.5). A total of 49 (20.8%) patients received an ED ≥ 50 mSv. The following factors were identified as independent predictors associated with an ED ≥ 50 mSv: Age older than 40 years, need for surgery, age under 16 years at diagnosis and disease duration over 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: a substantial proportion of patients with Crohn's disease receive high doses of potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation. Identification of the most susceptible patients to receive high doses of radiation, monitoring of effective doses received and the use of imaging techniques that do not require ionizing radiation (MR enterography, abdominal ultrasound) could contribute in reducing patients' exposure to potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Seminoma/epidemiology , Seminoma/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/etiology , Vulvar Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vulvar Neoplasms/etiology , Young Adult
15.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 104(9): 458-67, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23130853

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: endoscopic mucosal resection is an accepted technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: forty one consecutive patients (23 males and 18 females, mean age of 61 ± 11.5 years) were included in our study. Fifty nine resections were performed in these patients in 69 sessions. Lesions treated consisted of elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett's esophagus (group A), high grade dysplasia appearing in random biopsies taken during the follow-up of Barrett's esophagus (group B) and superficial gastroduodenal lesions (group C). Snare resection after submucosal injection, band ligator-assisted or cap-assisted mucosal resection were the chosen techniques. RESULTS: we resected 7 elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett's esophagus, 6 complete Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia in 16 sequential sessions and 46 gastroduodenal superficial lesions (10 adenomas, 9 gastric superficial carcinomas, 18 carcinoid tumours and 9 lesions of different histological nature). Resections in the two first groups were complete in 100% of the cases, and in 97.9% of the cases in group C. Complications included 2 cases of limited deferred bleeding (groups A and B) and another two cases of stenosis with little clinical relevance in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: a) endoscopic mucosal resection is an efficient technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions; b) it is a safe procedure with a low percentage of complications, which can generally be managed endoscopically; and c) in contrast with other ablative techniques, endoscopic mucosal resection offers the possibility of a pathologic analysis of the samples.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Duodenal Diseases/surgery , Duodenoscopy , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastroscopy , Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Stomach Diseases/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenoma/pathology , Adenoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Biopsy , Carcinoid Tumor/pathology , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Duodenal Diseases/pathology , Duodenoscopy/adverse effects , Electrocoagulation/methods , Female , Gastroscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Leiomyoma/pathology , Leiomyoma/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Diseases/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
16.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 104(9): 452-457, sept. 2012. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-107419

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la exposición a radiación ionizante se asocia a un mayor riesgo de desarrollar tumores. Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn requieren habitualmente múltiples pruebas de imagen que utilizan este tipo de radiación. Objetivos: los objetivos de este estudio son estimar la dosis total de radiación ionizante recibida por pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn a lo largo de su evolución e identificar los factores asociados a dosis de radiación más altas. Métodos: se incluyeron 235 pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn diagnosticados entre 1972 y 2010. Se calculó retrospectivamente la dosis efectiva (DE) recibida por cada paciente, teniendo en cuenta los tránsitos gastrointestinales y las tomografías computarizadas que se habían realizado. Basados en estudios epidemiológicos previos, se consideró un valor umbral de DE ≥ 50 mSv de mayor riesgo de desarrollar cáncer. Resultados: la media de DE recibida por paciente fue 33,4 mSv (IC 95% 29,3-37,5). Un total de 49 (20,8%) pacientes recibió una DE >= 50 mSv. Se identificaron como factores predictivos independientes asociados a una DE >= 50 mSv: edad mayor de 40 años, necesidad de cirugía, edad al diagnóstico menor 16 años y tiempo de evolución mayor de 8 años. Conclusiones: un porcentaje considerable de pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn recibe dosis elevadas de radiación ionizante potencialmente carcinogénicas. La identificación de los pacientes mas susceptibles a recibir dosis altas de radiación, la monitorización de la dosis efectiva recibida y la utilización de pruebas de imagen que no utilizan radiación ionizante (enterorresonancia, ecografía abdominal), podrían contribuir a reducir la exposición a la radiaciones ionizantes potencialmente carcinogénicas(AU)


Introduction: exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with an increased risk of developing tumors. Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) usually require multiple imaging tests using this type of radiation. Objectives: the objectives of this study were to estimate the total dose of ionizing radiation received by patients with Crohn’s disease during their course and to identify the factors associated with higher radiation doses. Methods: two hundred thirty-five CD patients diagnosed between 1972 and 2010 were included. The effective dose (ED) received by each patient was calculated retrospectively based on the number of gastrointestinal transit studies and computed tomography scans performed. Considering recent epidemiological studies, an ED greater than or equal to 50 mSv was used as the cut-off point for increased risk of developing cancer. Results: the mean ED received per patient was 33.4 mSv (95% CI 29.3-37.5). A total of 49 (20.8%) patients received an ED >= 50 mSv. The following factors were identified as independent predictors associated with an ED >= 50 mSv: Age older than 40 years, need for surgery, age under 16 years at diagnosis and disease duration over 8 years. Conclusions: a substantial proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease receive high doses of potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation. Identification of the most susceptible patients to receive high doses of radiation, monitoring of effective doses received and the use of imaging techniques that do not require ionizing radiation (MR enterography, abdominal ultrasound) could contribute in reducing patients’ exposure to potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Crohn Disease/therapy , Crohn Disease , Risk Factors , Gastrointestinal Transit , Gastrointestinal Transit/physiology , Retrospective Studies , /methods , Gastrointestinal Transit/radiation effects , Data Analysis/methods , Multivariate Analysis
17.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 104(9): 458-467, sept. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-107420

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la resección endoscópica mucosa es una técnica aceptada en el tratamiento de lesiones superficiales del tracto digestivo. Objetivos: evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de dicho procedimiento en el tracto digestivo superior. Material y métodos: se incluyeron en nuestro estudio 41 pacientes consecutivos (23 hombres y 18 mujeres, edad media de 60,6 años) a los que se les realizaron 59 resecciones en 69 sesiones. Se trataron las siguientes patologías: lesiones sobreelevadas con displasia de alto grado sobre esófago de Barrett (grupo A), displasia de alto grado en biopsias aleatorias del seguimiento de esófago de Barrett (grupo B) y lesiones superficiales gastroduodenales (grupo C). Las técnicas utilizadas fueron la resección con asa tras inyección submucosa, la asistida por bandas o por capuchón. Resultados: se resecaron 7 lesiones sobreelevadas con displasia de alto grado sobre esófago de Barrett, 6 esófagos de Barrett con displasia de alto grado de forma completa en 16 sesiones secuenciales de resección mucosa y 46 lesiones superficiales gastroduodenales (10 adenomas, 9 carcinomas gástricos superficiales, 18 carcinoides y 9 lesiones de diferente estirpe). Las resecciones se realizaron con éxito en el 100% de los dos primeros grupos y en el 97,9% del grupo C. Como complicaciones tuvimos 2 sangrados diferidos autolimitados (grupos A y B) y dos casos de estenosis con escasa relevancia clínica en el grupo B. Conclusiones: a) la resección endoscópica mucosa es una técnica eficaz en el tratamiento de lesiones superficiales del tracto digestivo superior; b) se trata de un procedimiento seguro, con un porcentaje de complicaciones muy bajo y que generalmente pueden ser manejadas de forma endoscópica; y c) al contrario que otras técnicas ablativas, permite el estudio anatomopatológico de las muestras(AU)


Introduction: endoscopic mucosal resection is an accepted technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions. Objectives: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. Material and methods: forty one consecutive patients (23 males and 18 females, mean age of 61 ± 11.5 years) were included in our study. Fifty nine resections were performed in these patients in 69 sessions. Lesions treated consisted of elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett’s esophagus (group A), high grade dysplasia appearing in random biopsies taken during the follow-up of Barrett’s esophagus (group B) and superficial gastroduodenal lesions (group C). Snare resection after submucosal injection, band ligator-assisted or cap-assisted mucosal resection were the chosen techniques. Results: we resected 7 elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett’s esophagus, 6 complete Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia in 16 sequential sessions and 46 gastroduodenal superficial lesions (10 adenomas, 9 gastric superficial carcinomas, 18 carcinoid tumours and 9 lesions of different histological nature). Resections in the two first groups were complete in 100% of the cases, and in 97.9% of the cases in group C. Complications included 2 cases of limited deferred bleeding (groups A and B) and another two cases of stenosis with little clinical relevance in Group B. Conclusions: a) endoscopic mucosal resection is an efficient technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions; b) it is a safe procedure with a low percentage of complications, which can generally be managed endoscopically; and c) in contrast with other ablative techniques, endoscopic mucosal resection offers the possibility of a pathologic analysis of the samples(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Evaluation of the Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions , /methods , /trends , Barrett Esophagus/complications , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/physiopathology , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...