Influence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity on carotid adventitial vasa vasorum.

Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects a quarter of the world's population and encompasses a spectrum of liver conditions, from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to inflammation and fibrosis. In addition, NAFLD also links to extrahepatic conditions like diabetes or obesity. However, it remains unclear if NAFLD independently correlates with the onset and progression of atherosclerosis. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between NAFLD severity, assessed via liver biopsy, and early atherosclerosis using adventitial vasa vasorum (VV) density. It included 44 patients with obesity (33 with steatosis, 11 with NASH) undergoing bariatric surgery. Results: Results revealed no significant differences in adventitial VV density between steatosis and NASH groups, neither in the mean values [0.759 ± 0.104 vs. 0.780 ± 0.043, P=0.702] nor left-right sides. Similarly, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) did not vary between these groups. Additionally, no linear correlation existed between VV density and cIMT. Only gender showed an association with VV density. Conclusion: These findings suggest that NASH severity doesn't independently drive early atherosclerosis or affects cIMT. Gender might play a role in early atherosclerotic disease in NAFLD, impacting VV density and cIMT. This highlights the need to consider other risk factors when evaluating cardiovascular risk in NAFLD patients.

Mid-term Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease Remission and Predictive Factors: A Prospective Study with a Focus on Non-invasive Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now termed metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), is a growing health concern associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Bariatric surgery offers potential benefits, but its impact on MAFLD remains incompletely understood, with scarce long-term follow-up prospective studies. Moreover, being liver biopsy the gold standard for liver condition measurement, the need for non-invasive techniques that allow the assessment of MAFLD development after bariatric surgery is imperative. OWLiver® Care and OWLiver® represent two serum lipidomic tests, featuring panels comprising 11 and 20 triglycerides, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving 80 Caucasians to assess the effects of bariatric surgery on MAFLD using non-invasive diagnostics and to identify baseline predictors of MAFLD remission. Serum samples were collected before surgery and at a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: After 3 years, the proportion of patients exhibiting a healthy liver escalated from 5.0% at baseline to 26.3%. Conversely, the percentage of steatohepatitis declined from 35.1% to a mere 7.6%. Younger age, female gender, and the absence of type 2 diabetes were associated with MAFLD remission. However, age stood as the only independent variable associated with this favorable liver evolution (R2 = 0.112). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery demonstrates mid-term benefits in improving MAFLD, with younger age as a baseline predictor of remission. Non-invasive diagnostic methods, like OWLiver®, are valuable tools for monitoring MAFLD evolution. Further research with larger populations and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine personalized treatment approaches.

Telomere length in patients with obesity submitted to bariatric surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obesity show evidence of increased levels of inflammation, oxidative stress and premature ageing. Telomere length (TL) is a key marker of cellular ageing, and patients with obesity often present shorter TL. Bariatric surgery (BS) is currently the most effective treatment for severe obesity. The aim of this systematic review was to explore whether the beneficial health effects observed after surgery in obese patients correspond to a restoration in TL or slower rates of shortening. As a secondary aim, we evaluated, at baseline and post-surgery, the relationship between TL and different factors that could play a role in TL changes along time. METHODS: Searches for relevant articles were performed in MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and SCOPUS. Prospective longitudinal studies that evaluated leukocyte TL in adult patients who had undergone BS were included. Data were extracted and evaluated by two independent researchers. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with the number CRD42020197711. RESULTS: Seven studies based on independent samples that fulfilled our inclusion criteria were included. Obese patients showed shorter telomeres compared to healthy individuals. Long-term studies (>2 years) seem to suggest an improvement in TL after surgery presumably due to the improvement of the inflammatory and oxidative levels of the patients induced by weight loss. CONCLUSION: Studies seem to point towards a beneficial long-term effect of BS on TL recovery. However, the scarce number of studies and the heterogeneity in the variables analysed in the different cohorts make it difficult to draw a firm conclusion. More studies are needed to evaluate long-term changes to TL following BS.

Influence of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on weight loss after bariatric surgery: a 24-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective long-term treatment for severe obesity. However, interindividual variation in surgery outcome has been observed, and research suggests a moderating effect of several factors including baseline co-morbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes [T2D] and genetic factors). No data are currently available on the interaction between T2D and variants in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its effect on weight loss after surgery. OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265) and the influence of T2D and their interaction on weight loss after bariatric surgery in a cohort of patients with severe obesity. SETTING: University hospital in Spain. METHODS: The present study evaluated a cohort of 158 patients with obesity submitted to bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) followed up for 24 months (loss to follow-up: 0%). During the postoperative period, percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and total weight loss (%TWL) were evaluated. RESULTS: Longitudinal analyses showed a suggestive effect of BDNF genotype on the %EWL (P = .056) and indicated that individuals carrying the methionine (Met) allele may experience a better outcome after bariatric surgery than those with the valine/valine (Val/Val) genotype. We found a negative effect of a T2D diagnosis at baseline on %EBMIL (P = .004). Additionally, we found an interaction between BDNF genotype and T2D on %EWL and %EBMIL (P = .027 and P = .0004, respectively), whereby individuals with the Met allele without T2D displayed a greater %EWL and greater %EBMIL at 12 months and 24 months than their counterparts with T2D or patients with the Val/Val genotype with or without T2D. CONCLUSION: Our data showed an association between the Met variant and greater weight loss after bariatric surgery in patients without T2D. The presence of T2D seems to counteract this positive effect.

Una evaluación crítica de la relación entre la industria alimentaria y la investigación en salud / A critical assessment of the relation between the food industry and health research

Objetivo: Describir la influencia de las corporaciones alimentarias en los resultados de la investigación en salud. Método: Revisión sistemática en MedLine, Cochrane Library Plus y Scopus usando los MESH ‘Food Industry’, ‘Food-Processing Industry’, ‘Biomedical Research’ y ‘Research Support as Topic’, y las palabras clave ‘Industry Sponsorship’ y ‘Funding Source’. La calidad fue evaluada mediante las directrices PRISMA. Resultados: Se revisaron 1506 artículos y se incluyeron 10, de los cuales dos analizaban la relación entre financiación y calidad respecto a resultados; seis, la relación entre financiación y resultados; y dos, la calidad metodológica. Seis mostraron efectos favorables a los productos de las industrias financiadoras. En cuanto a la calidad, no se observaron diferencias según la financiación, pero sí una peor calidad en aquellas que no la declaraban. Conclusión: La financiación por parte de la industria alimentaria de investigaciones en salud se asocia a resultados favorables a sus productos, aunque no afecta a la calidad de los estudios (AU)

Objective: To describe the influence of the food industry in health research, observing how funding influences health outcomes and the quality of the studies. Method: We performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library Plus and Scopus using the MESH ‘Food Industry’, ‘Food-Processing Industry’, ‘Biomedical Research’, ‘Research Support as Topic’, and the keywords ‘Industry Sponsorship’ and ‘Funding Source’. The quality was assessed using the PRISMA guidelines. Results: We revised 1,506 articles and 10 were included; two reviewed the relationship between funding-outcomes and quality-outcomes; six focused on the funding-outcomes relationship; and the other two focused on methodological quality. Six showed that funding from the food industry resulted in more favourable outcomes for their products. No differences in quality were found in relation to the funding source, but those which did not declare their funding had a worse quality. Conclusion: Studies funded by the food industry showed favourable results for their products. However, this fact did not affect the quality of the studies (AU)

[A critical assessment of the relation between the food industry and health research]. / Una evaluación crítica de la relación entre la industria alimentaria y la investigación en salud.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the influence of the food industry in health research, observing how funding influences health outcomes and the quality of the studies. METHOD: We performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library Plus and Scopus using the MESH "Food Industry", "Food-Processing Industry", "Biomedical Research", "Research Support as Topic", and the keywords "Industry Sponsorship" and "Funding Source". The quality was assessed using the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: We revised 1,506 articles and 10 were included; two reviewed the relationship between funding-outcomes and quality-outcomes; six focused on the funding-outcomes relationship; and the other two focused on methodological quality. Six showed that funding from the food industry resulted in more favourable outcomes for their products. No differences in quality were found in relation to the funding source, but those which did not declare their funding had a worse quality. CONCLUSION: Studies funded by the food industry showed favourable results for their products. However, this fact did not affect the quality of the studies.