ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and predictors of brain donation by relatives in patients with neurodegenerative dementia. DESIGN: Database review and quantitative analysis. SETTING: The Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation (ACRSF), a center devoted to the care and research of patients with neurodegenerative dementia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with signed consent for participation in the ACRSF research program. MEASUREMENTS: A set of 38 demographic, clinical, and social variables related to patient and closest relative, which were collected by the ACRSF multidisciplinary team upon patient admission. RESULTS: Admission data were available for 198 patients who entered the ACRSF research program; 85 of them (42.9%) died during follow-up. Mean age (SD) at admission was 82.3 (6.8) years and 80.8% of the patients were female. Family link between patient and closest relative was spouse or partner (12.0%), son or daughter (74.9%), or other link (13.1%). Brain was obtained from 56 patients (65.9%). Consent by legal representative and patient's depressive symptoms were more frequent in the donors (p<0.05, corrected) and trend was observed for more aberrant motor symptoms in the donors (p<0.05, uncorrected). CONCLUSION: A high rate of brain donation was achieved, probably due to the unique characteristics of the ACRSF and consent for research policy. Wish of alleviating suffering, as well as general interest in dementia research, possibly exerted an influence in brain donation. More research is needed to ascertain the values, motivations, and circumstances that may lead to brain donation by proxy in neurodegenerative dementia.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric attributes of the Spanish version of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD) in institutionalized patients and family caregivers in Spain. METHOD: 101 patients (88.1% women; mean age, 83.2 ± 6.3) with Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 82) and mixed dementia (n = 19) and their closest family caregivers. Patient-related variables included severity of dementia, cognitive status, perceived general health, quality of life, behavior, apathy, depression, and functional status. QoL-AD acceptability, reliability, and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 7.2 ± 6.1 and Global Deterioration Scale was: stage four (4%); five (21.2%); six (34.3%); and seven (40.4%). Both, QoL-AD patient version (QoL-ADp) (n = 40; MMSE = 12.0 ± 4.5) and QoL-AD caregiver version (QoL-ADc) (n = 101) lacked significant floor and ceiling effects and the Cronbach α index was 0.90 and 0.86, respectively. The corrected item-total correlation was 0.11-0.68 (QoL-ADc) and 0.28-0.84 (QoL-ADp). Stability was satisfactory for QoL-ADp (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.83) but low for QoL-ADc (ICC = 0.51); the standard error of measurement was 2.72 and 4.69. Construct validity was moderate/high for QoL-ADc (QUALID=-0.43; EQ-5D = 0.65), but lower for QoL-ADp. No significant correlations were observed between QoL-ADp and patient variables or QoL-ADc. A low to high association (r = 0.18-0.55) was obtained between QoL-ADc and patient-related measures of neuropsychiatric, function, and cognitive status. CONCLUSION: Differences in their psychometric attributes, and discrepancy between them, were found for QoL-ADp and QoL-ADc. In patients with AD and advanced dementia, the QoL perceived by the patient could be based on a construct that is different from the traditional QoL construct.
