Plantar pressure displacement after anesthetic motor block and tibial nerve neurotomy in spastic equinovarus foot.

The aim of this study was to analyze the displacements of center of pressure (COP) using an in-shoe recording system (F-Scan) before and after motor nerve block and neurotomy of the tibial nerve in spastic equinovarus foot. Thirty-nine patients (age 45 ± 15 yr) underwent a motor nerve block; 16 (age 38 ± 15.2 yr) had tibial neurotomy, combined with tendinous surgery (n = 9). The displacement of the COP (anteroposterior [AP], lateral deviation [LD], posterior margin [PM]) was compared between paretic and nonparetic limbs before and after block and surgery. At baseline, the nonparetic limb had a higher AP (17.3 vs 12.3 cm, p < 0.001) and LD (4.0 vs 3.3 cm, p = 0.001) and a smaller PM (2.9 vs 4.7 cm, p = 0.001). For the paretic limb, a significant increase of AP was observed after block (13.5 vs 12.3 cm, p = 0.02) and after surgery (13.7 vs 12.3 cm, p = 0.03). A significant decrease of PM was observed after surgery (4.5 vs 3.3 cm, p < 0.001) with no more difference between two limbs (2.8 vs 3.3 cm; p = 0.44). This study shows that the F-Scan system can be used to quantify impairments and be useful to evaluate the effects of treatment for spastic foot. It suggests that changes in AP displacement following block may predict the effects of neurotomy.

Specular right-left disorientation, finger-agnosia, and asomatognosia in right hemisphere stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To search for specular disorders of body representations in right hemisphere stroke. BACKGROUND: Mirror self-misidentification, asomatognosia, and personal confabulation are similar to body illusions or changes in sensorial or sensorimotor perceptions generated by mirror in right brain damage patients with body image disorders. METHOD: Prospective study. Ten consecutive right-handed patients (1) performed body part naming and localization tasks and (2) were examined for asomatognosia at the acute phase of stroke, then at least 3 months after stroke, under 3 test conditions: without a mirror, with a conventional mirror, and with an inverted mirror. Video recordings of the tests were analyzed to assess performance. RESULTS: Analysis of variance of the data confirmed that the interaction of mirror's conditions (specifically without a mirror vs. an inverted mirror) with subtest type was significant. The errors are symmetrically distributed. Asomatognosia was "reactivated" in 10 patients who experienced asomatognosia during the acute phase. No particular pattern characterized the clinical manifestations of asomatognosia. CONCLUSIONS: A causal conflict of sensorial input is proposed. The specific symptoms observed would suggest the existence of an incomplete specular Gerstmann syndrome and/or Anton Babinski syndrome. These results emphasize the role of specular input in the generation of body representations and self-awareness.