Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 43(10): 1849-56, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164901

ABSTRACT

AIM: In intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients, to avoid extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), the updated Briganti nomogram is recommended with the cost of missing 1.5 % of patients with lymph node invasion (LNI). Is it possible to reduce the percentage of unexpected LNI patients (nomogram false negative)? We used the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique systematically associated with laparoscopic ePLND to assess the potential value of isotopic SLN method to adress this point. METHODS: Two hundred and two consecutive patients had procedures with isotopic SLN detection associated with laparoscopic ePLND for high or intermediate risk of PC. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of different models as: the updated Briganti nomogram, the percentage of positive cores, and an equation of the best predictors of LNI. We tested the model cutoffs associated with an optimal negative predictive value (NPV) and the best cutoff associated with avoiding false negative SLN detection, in order to assist the clinician's decision of when to spare ePLND. RESULTS: LNI was detected in 35 patients (17.2 %). Based on preoperative primary Gleason grade and percentage of positive cores, a bivariate model was built to calculate a combined score reflecting the risk of LNI. For the Briganti nomogram, the 5 % probability cutoff avoided ePLND in 53 % (108/202) of patients, missing three LNI patients (8.6 %), but all were detected by the SLN technique. For our bivariate model, the best cutoff was <10, leaving no patient with LNI due to positive SLN detection (four patients = 11.4 %), and avoiding ePLND in 52 % (105/202) of patients. CONCLUSION: For patients with a low risk of LNI determined using the updated Briganti nomogram or bivariate model, SLN technique could be used alone for lymph node staging in intermediate- or high-risk PC patients.


Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymphoscintigraphy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Aged , Humans , Laparoscopy , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery
2.
J Nucl Med ; 55(5): 753-8, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24686781

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this prospective study was to validate, through laparoscopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique correlated with hyperextensive pelvic resection (extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection) in patients with localized PC, candidates for local curative treatment. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection of (99m)Tc-sulfur rhenium colloid (0.3 mL/100 MBq) in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. Detection was performed intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe, followed by extensive resection. SLN counts were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. Histologic analysis was performed by hematoxylin-phloxine-safran staining, followed by immunohistochemistry if the SLN was free of metastasis. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients with PC at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases were included. The intraoperative detection rate was 96% (195/203). Thirty-five patients had lymph node metastases, 19 only in the SLN. The false-negative rate was 8.5% (3/35). Unilateral surgical SLN detection did not validate bilateral pelvic lymph node status, and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection was necessary on the opposite side of detection to minimize the false-negative rate (2.8% [1/35]). A significant metastatic sentinel invasion in the common iliac region existed (9.3%) but was always associated with other metastatic node areas. The internal iliac region was the primary metastatic site (40.7%). Finally, this series invalidated any justification for a standard or limited dissection, which would have missed 51.9% and 74.1% of lymph node metastases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The radioisotope SLN identification method up to the common iliac region is successful to identify sentinel nodes during laparoscopic surgery per hemipelvis to be acceptably considered as an isolated procedure and should be validated for intermediate- and high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/diagnosis , Carcinoma/surgery , Laparoscopy , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Lymphoscintigraphy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Reproducibility of Results , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Technetium , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...