Care pathway, towards the establishment of tailored funding: Reasons and criteria for success.

Care pathways are often at the forefront of political thinking about health care practices in France without ever finding a durable means for their extension. Closely linked to funding of healthcare system, they have, once again, been the object of so many economical discussions in 2017, as part of a more optimistic climate of governance which is therefore more open to change. Our changing system, the development and increasingly chronic nature of diseases, the scale of technological breakthroughs, these are all factors driving this topic forward. The object of this work, after a necessary study of the semantics of the term "pathway" and even "funding", was to identify all prerequisites and good practices for the stakeholders to develop a pilot pathway and then its relevant implementation in France. To do so, the members of the Round Table have relied on the presentation of examples of care pathways in order to identify triggers to a progressive, adapted extension to the whole territory. The group has identified key elements and priorities for the establishment of public funding beyond existing funding to incentive team work, particularly in the case of treatment rupture points and/or when they have diverging interests. Finally, creating a climate of confidence among patients, professionals, hospitals, the ARS, payers and manufacturers in handling change management will become the key challenges of the implementation of future pathways.

What is the budget impact of a new treatment or new health technology arriving on the market?

In France, market access for innovative drugs (level I, II & III improvement of medical service rendered having significant impact on health insurance expenditure) involves medico-economic evaluation. In addition to cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), budget impact analysis (BIA) can be performed, especially since the sustainability of the health insurance system has become a growing concern for all stakeholders. The members of the Giens 2016 round table discussed the contribution of BIA based on a review of the literature on distribution models, the participants' experiences including experience related to the modalities of hospital assessments, and examples from other countries. The round table established recommendations on four elements of interest: 1: the use of BIA from a contractual point of view - between manufacturers and the French Economic Committee for Health Products - during the price negotiations process, and from a prospective point of view within the framework of the annual review of budget expenditures; the definition of the target population and the rhythm of a health product's distribution are also major elements; 2: the interpretation of BIA results in light of CEA results: for what products and at what moment in the life cycle of these products; 3: the integration of the rhythm of a health product's distribution into the BIA; 4: preoccupations about how the level of health product implementation is integrated into the BIA in terms of opportunity cost and organisational quality for the promoter.

Outcomes and general health-related quality of life among patients medically treated in general daily practice for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: This study's aim was to describe and evaluate outcomes of medical strategies used for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) treatment in general practice and to assess impact of LUTS on patients' general health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted by French general practitioners. Eligible patients were males aged ≥50 years, diagnosed for at least one year and currently treated for LUTS due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Several validated questionnaires were documented by patients to assess severity of LUTS (IPSS), specific quality of life (IPSS-Q8), impact of LUTS (BII), LUTS evolution (VNS) and general HRQoL (EQ-5D). RESULTS: Among 1,098 patients included, 82.7% were treated with monotherapies and 17.3% with combinations. Mean treatment duration was 5.2 ± 3.2 years, and 47.2% of patients had at least one treatment modification since initiation. Patients reported diminished quality of life (IPSS-Q8 ≥3) (42.3%), persisting symptoms (IPSS-score ≥12) (35.5%), symptoms worsening (VNS-score ≤-1) (18.8%) and high bother (BII-score ≥9) (2.6%). Globally, 52.8% had at least one of these unsatisfactory outcomes. Regarding general HRQoL, mean EQ-5D utility significantly decreased with LUTS severity (mild: 0.90 ± 0.12; moderate: 0.81 ± 0.21; and severe symptoms: 0.73 ± 0.25; P < 0.001). As well, all five-dimensions of EQ-5D were significantly altered in patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS (<0.001), especially 'Pain/Discomfort' and 'Anxiety/Depression'. In multivariate analyses including age and comorbidities, EQ-5D utility index remained negatively associated with each additional unit in the IPSS-score. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that around half of BPH patients medically treated report unsatisfactory outcomes, suggesting consequential unmet medical needs in general practice. Also, moderate-to-severe LUTS significantly impact on general HRQoL.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an estimate of the average cost in the hospital setting in France.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe drug adverse effect with possible dramatic consequences. The risk is 0.1% to 5%. The costs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in France were estimated using the Programme Médicalisé des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI) national discharge database. Hospitalizations with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were identified using diagnostic codes. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the French Sickness Fund or hospitals. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia could be the reason of admission or could occur during the stay and lead to a different tariff or to additional costs associated with extra length of stay. Direct costs were also estimated from experts' opinions. A sensitivity analysis was performed from data collected in 1 center. During 2005, 445 hospitalizations with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia codes were identified. For 45 patients, the main diagnosis was heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; for the remaining 400 patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred during the hospital stay. Tariffs and extra costs were used to estimate an overall average cost of 3230 for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. For patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as main diagnosis, the average cost was 3400; for the patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that occurred during the stay, 1910 was due to an increased of the tariff and 3348 to an increased length of stay. Estimated direct costs of an episode were 3350 to 3700. Different methods were used to arrive at an estimated cost of 3500 for a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia episode for inpatients. One limitation of the study is that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia tends to be underreported by physicians during hospitalization.

Economic evaluation of a combined DTPa, hepatitis B, polio, Hib vaccine. Potential impact of the introduction of Infanrix-Hexa in the French childhood immunisation schedule.

A new hexavalent combination vaccine, Infanrix-HEXA, including a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in addition to the vaccines for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type B, has recently become available in France. The objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate the break-even price of Infanrix-Hexa for the National Sickness Fund; (2) evaluate its potential impact on vaccine coverage for hepatitis B and the corresponding budget impact. The public price of Infanrix-HEXA associated with a break-even point would be 53.77 euro. Our analyses suggested that other estimates based on a societal perspective including opportunity and indirect costs remained close to this value. The annual additional reimbursed cost of protecting an infant against the risk of hepatitis B would be 28.20 euro per child, or about 21 million euro for an annual cohort of 760,000 births (total cost, 35 million euro). The number of infants protected against hepatitis B could increase from 230,000 in the current situation to about 600,000.