[Locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: Identification of barriers and levers of patients' pathway in France]. / Cancer de la vessie localement avancé ou métastatique : identification des freins et leviers du parcours des patients en France.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer is currently ranked as the 8th most common cancer in France. However, the patient care pathway for this cancer is still not well known. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted with fifteen healthcare professionals, ten patients, and five family caregivers between November 2020 and March 2021. The objectives of this survey were to identify the major steps in the care pathway according to the medical, emotional and societal dimensions, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, the associated barriers, and the initiatives to be implemented to improve it. RESULTS: Several barriers were identified at different stages of the overall care pathway, including lack of knowledge of risk factors and warning signs of the disease by the general population and some healthcare professionals, difficulties linked to the announcement consultation, lack of psychological support for patients and their caregivers, and lack of information given about the disease and supportive care. DISCUSSION: These results allowed us to identify three major initiatives which could improve the overall care pathway and the quality of life of patients and their caregivers: 1/implementation of a public awareness campaign on bladder cancer; 2/creation of booklets for patients and their caregivers to provide them with a source of reliable information; and 3/the creation of communication tools between healthcare professionals and patients to facilitate exchanges during consultations.

Percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective comparison of the translaryngeal technique versus the forceps-dilational technique in 100 critically ill adults.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two different techniques of percutaneous tracheostomy: Griggs' forceps-dilational technique and Fantoni's translaryngeal technique, both performed with the manufacturer's basic kit and with bronchoscopic guidance. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare the two tracheostomy techniques. Critically ill patients requiring elective tracheostomy for long-term ventilation were randomized for translaryngeal tracheostomy or forceps-dilational tracheostomy. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a military teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 100 adult patients in the intensive care unit who were mechanically ventilated. PROCEDURES: All tracheostomy procedures were performed at the bedside by using a commercially available set. The procedures were performed by two surgeons, one for bronchoscopic guidance and management of the airway and one for the tracheostomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The measurements were divided into procedure-related variables (duration, technical difficulties, oxygenation): major and minor complications. The procedure was longer in the translaryngeal technique group (12.9 vs. 6.9 mins, p =.0018). Technical difficulties occurred in 11 patients in the translaryngeal technique group. Uneventful forceps dilational tracheostomy was performed instead. There has been no mortality associated with either technique. Serious complications occurred in one patient in the forceps-dilational technique group (one posterior tracheal wall injury) and in four patients in the translaryngeal technique group (one with a posterior tracheal wall injury and three with severe hypoxia). Significant hypercarbia and acidosis occurred in both the translaryngeal technique group and the forceps-dilational technique group. A significant decrease in Pao2 was observed in the translaryngeal technique group (311 to 261, p =.0069). No bleeding requiring intervention occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Serious complications related to percutaneous tracheostomy occurred in 8.5% and 1.8% of the cases in the translaryngeal technique and the forceps-dilational technique group, respectively (p <.001). Technical difficulties were not rare when using the translaryngeal technique (23%). On the basis of our results, we concluded that the forceps-dilation technique is superior to the translaryngeal technique, with fewer technical difficulties and fewer complications for critically ill patients.