QMAC-dRAST for the direct testing of antibiotic susceptibility for Enterobacterales in positive blood-culture broth: a comparison of the performances with the MicroScan system and direct disc diffusion testing methods.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performances of the QMAC-dRAST GN (Gram-negative) kit for rapid antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) and two other methods, directly on positive blood-culture broth (PBCB), by comparison with a reference method: the MicroScan method based on broth microdilution on colonies isolated on PBCB subculture. METHODS: In total, 156 samples were collected prospectively from blood cultures positive for a Gram-negative rod. Each sample was tested with four AST techniques: (i) the QMAC dRAST GN kit, (ii) the disc diffusion (DD) method, (iii) the MicroScan method applied directly to PBCB; and (iv) MicroScan with isolates from PBCB subculture, as a reference. RESULTS: For 124 PBCB containing Enterobacterales, overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between the QMAC-dRAST on PBCB and the reference reached 95.7% and 93.5%, respectively. There were 3.0% very major errors (VME), 4.0% major errors (ME) and 2.8% minor errors (mE). A comparison of MicroScan on PBCB and the reference yielded 98.8% EA, 98.5% CA, and rates of 0.6% VME, 0.9% ME and 0.7% mE. The DD method on PBCB gave a CA of 95.8% and rates of 1.7% for VME, 2.0% for ME and 1.9% for mE. Results were obtained more rapidly for QMAC-dRAST (median of 6 h 37 min versus 18 h for the MicroScan and DD methods on PBCB). CONCLUSIONS: The QMAC-dRAST system provided rapid results well correlated with the reference method on PBCB containing Enterobacterales. Given the shorter time-to-results, the QMAC-dRAST system constitutes a fast and reliable alternative to conventional AST methods.

[Study impacto: Descriptive analyzis of pharmacist's clinical practice in onco-hematology]. / Étude impacto : analyse descriptive des pratiques de pharmacie clinique en cancérologie.

Pharmaceutical analyses of chemotherapy prescriptions by hospital pharmacists are activities codified by regulation and rules (bon usage). The involvement of the pharmacists in clinical pharmacy activities in the oncology setting is not clearly identified, justifying the development of a mapping of these activities from a questionnaire addressed to the professionals. One hundred and seven centers have participated to this study at the national level (overall participation rate of 32.4%). More than 95% of them used a computerized ordering system and three quarter of them submit the introduction of new compounds to an analysis by the drug therapeutic committee. Prescription analysis allowed detecting around 2% of errors from the current prescription. Clinical pharmacist participates to tumor boards of onco-hematology (RCP) at a level of 46% for senior pharmacist and 42% for junior pharmacist. This involvement in the RCP allowed anticipating protocol's modification and temporary used authorization. Ninety-two percent of the senior pharmacists estimate that they highlight the risk of no reimbursement for prescription out of the guideline during RCP, resulting to a modification of the prescription for 40% of them. This level of intervention is lower with respectively 64% and 10% for the juniors. This study underlines the expert value of the clinical pharmacist dedicated to oncology setting in pre and post analysis prescriptions. It could be targeted by a prospective analysis of both clinical and pharmacoeconomics impact of these interventions.

Application of HPLC to counting of colored microspheres in determination of regional blood flow.

Colored microspheres have become popular compared with radioactive microspheres because they do not use radioactivity. However, they suffer from a much greater variability in their determination. We have developed a new method for assaying the dye using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with internal standard. This technique permits accurate determination of < or = 400 spheres in rat blood, heart, kidney, liver, and brain with a relative error [coefficient of variation (CV)] < 10%. To date, only three colors (white, yellow, and red) may be used because, of the five colors tested, one (violet) served as internal standard and another (blue) exhibited marked degradation during extraction. Compared with the classical spectrophotometric technique, HPLC allows a three to five times improvement in reproducibility with a relative error significantly lower (P < 0.01) than with direct spectrophotometry. Although this new technique appears to be more time consuming than the classical method, its use seems to be preferable because of the improvement in measurement sensitivity.