ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Algorithmic tools such as early warning systems (EWSs) have been embedded into clinical practice globally to facilitate the early recognition of patient deterioration and to guide the escalation of care. Concerns have been raised that the mandated use of these EWS tools may impact the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. However, the relationship between EWS tools and the development of higher-order thinking is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This paper provides the qualitative results of a larger study that sought to explore the impact of EWS tools on the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. The objective of this component of the study was to ascertain the thoughts and perceptions of nurses on the use of EWSs and how this related to the development of higher-order thinking skills. METHODS: A mixed-method, concurrent study design was used to explore the concept of the development of nurses' higher-order thinking in the context of EWS tools. The qualitative responses from a Qualtrics survey were thematically analysed and presented. FINDINGS: Two major themes were uncovered: White Lies and Safety Nets. Our analysis of the data suggested that some nurses amend their documentation practice to accommodate the EWS's escalation process, uncovering a view that the tool did not account for clinical reasoning. Parallel to this, some nurses found that these systems supported clinical decision-making and helped to build confidence, thus acting as a safety net for their practice. CONCLUSION: Reliance on EWSs can both hinder and/or support the development of higher-order thinking. Early warning systems are useful tools in ensuring patient safety but should be used in conjunction with nurses' higher-order thinking.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Physiological signs of clinical deterioration are known to occur in the hours preceding a serious adverse event. As a result, track and trigger systems known as early warning systems (EWS) were introduced and routinely implemented as patient observation tools to trigger an alert in the presence of abnormal vital signs. OBJECTIVE: The objective aimed to explore the literature pertaining to EWS and their utilisation in rural, remote and regional health care facilities. DESIGN: The Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework was used to guide the scoping review. Only studies reporting on rural, remote and regional health care settings were included. All four authors participated in the screening, data extraction and analysis process. FINDINGS: Our search strategy yielded 3869 peer-reviewed articles published between 2012 and 2022, with six studies ultimately included. Collectively, the studies included in this scoping review examined the complex interaction between patient vital signs observation charts and recognition of patient deterioration. DISCUSSION: Whilst rural, remote and regional clinicians use EWS to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration, noncompliance dilutes the tool's effectiveness. This overarching finding is informed by three contributing factors: documentation, communication and challenges specific to the rural context. CONCLUSION: The success of EWS relies on accurate documentation and effective communication within the interdisciplinary team to support appropriate responses to clinical patient decline. More research is required to understand the nuances and complexities of rural and remote nursing and to address challenges associated with the use of EWS in rural health care settings.
