Is non-operative management of severe blunt splenic injury safer than embolization or surgery? Results from a French prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The management of the severe blunt splenic injuries remains debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of splenic injury according to severity and management (surgery, embolization, non-operative management [NOM]). METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted including patients aged 16 years and older with diagnosed splenic injury. We evaluated severity according to the AAST classification, the presence of hemoperitoneum or a contrast blush on initial CT scan. The initial hemodynamic status, patients co-morbidities, the ISS (injury severity score), management and morbidity were also noted. RESULTS: Between May 2010 and May 2012, 91 patients were included. Thirty-seven patients (41%) had mild splenic injury (AAST I or II and a small hemoperitoneum) while 54 patients (59%) had severe splenic injury (AAST III or greater). The management included 18 splenectomies (20%), 15 embolizations (16%). Among 67 patients undergoing NOM without initial embolization, five (7%) developed secondary bleeding, five required surgery and nine underwent secondary embolization. No patient died and morbidity was 44% (n=40), 13% for mild injuries vs. 65% for severe injuries (P<0.01). For severe injuries, total morbidity was 58% after NOM, 73% after embolization and 70% after surgery. Specific morbidity related to the management was 10% after NOM vs. 47% after embolization (P=0.02). Specific morbidity after surgery was 15%. CONCLUSION: Embolization, because of its important specific morbidity, should not be performed as a prophylactic measure, but only in presence of clinical or laboratory signs of bleeding.

Splenic injury: management in the Languedoc-Roussillon region.

GOAL OF STUDY: Treatment of splenic injury is not standardized. We conducted an inventory of splenic injury treatment modalities of splenic injury in the Languedoc-Roussillon region of France. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to 33 surgeons practicing in 10 hospitals in that region. Surgeons were asked: how many cases were treated per year (PMSI databank for the last three years), local resources (resuscitation bay or intensive care unit, availability of CT and interventional radiology), indications (surgery, embolization, nonoperative management [NOM]), prognostic criteria, NOM modalities (duration of bed rest, hospital stay, restriction of physical activity, thromboembolic prophylaxis, and imaging schedule). RESULTS: Thirty-one surgeons replied. An average of 185 patients were treated per year. There was consensus concerning the indication for urgent splenectomy, NOM was practiced in the stable patient (even with diffuse hemoperitoneum) and splenic artery embolization was performed for active bleeding (blush on CT) (for the six centers who have interventional radiology at their disposal). Disparities existed between centers concerning the modalities of NOM excepting imaging monitoring, initial surveillance in resuscitation bay or intensive care and in the therapeutic indications when bleeding persisted. CONCLUSION: Based on the consensus observed in this study and an analysis of the literature, a uniform treatment policy can be proposed.

Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.

BACKGROUND: The disadvantages of laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease include the risk of conversion to open operation and longer operative time. The aim of this study was to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion in 168 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopically assisted colectomy between January 1994 and June 2001. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion to open surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity and patient recovery. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates were zero, 21.4 per cent (n = 36), 14.3 per cent (n = 24) and 3.0 per cent (n = 5) respectively. The reasons for conversion were presence of intraperitoneal adhesions and/or inflammatory pseudotumour (n = 21), an intraoperative diagnosis of sigmoid cancer (n = 1), hypercapnia (n = 1) and abdominal bleeding (n = 1). Three preoperative factors were associated with a significant higher risk of conversion: surgical expertise, the presence of sigmoid stenosis or fistula, and the severity of diverticulitis on pathological examination. Morbidity was no different between laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (30 of 144; 20.8 per cent) and converted procedures (six of 24; 25.0 per cent). Open conversion was associated with a longer operative time and significantly delayed patient recovery and hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience and severe diverticular disease are predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy. Even if necessary, conversion does not increase the morbidity rate.

[Treatment of common bile duct stones with laparoscopy. Retrospective multicenter study with 612 patients]. / Traitement de la lithiase de la voie biliaire principale sous laparoscopie. Etude rétrospective multicentrique chez 612 malades.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse retrospectively the results of one-stage laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones in 19 surgical centers in France. PATIENTS: From January 1991 to July 1996, 612 patients with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic treatment. RESULTS: Overall duct clearance was obtained in 489 of the 612 patients (80%): through the cystic duct in 222 of 380 patients (58.4%), by secondary choledochotomy (after unsuccessful transcystic duct extraction) in 77 of 96 (80%), and in 190 of 232 (82 %) by primary choledochotomy. The overall duct clearance rate increased from 65% in 1991 to 84% in 1996. The use of the choledochotomy approach increased from 43% in 1991 to 69% in 1996 (P<0.01), due to a substantial increase in primary choledochotomy. In contrast, the use of the transcystic approach decreased from 57% to 31% (P<0.01). The mean time for surgery was shorter for cystic duct exploration than for primary choledochotomy (101+/-51 vs. 155+/-62 min, P<0.0001). The mean hospital stay decreased from 7.7+/-3.6 days in 1991 to 4.1+/-2 days in 1996 (P<0.001). The main biliary complications were related to biliary drainage (2,8%) and retained stones (3.1%). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laparoscopy is a good alternative with a low complication rate, a short hospital stay, and is an effective and safe option for the management of common bile duct stones.

Specific vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava: review of 1361 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the complications specifically related to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with preservation of the inferior vena cava and to their therapeutic management. This preservation technique has considerably influenced the surgical phases of liver transplantation, increasing hepatectomy time and modifying the number of vascular anastomoses. METHODS: Our retrospective multicentric study, based on data from 1361 adult patients that had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava in France between 1991 and 1997, analyzed the concomitant surgical complications. Type of cavo-caval anastomosis performed (piggyback, end-to-side, or side-to-side), use of a temporary portacaval anastomosis, technique-related complications, and mortality, were investigated. RESULTS: Cavo-caval anastomosis was side-to-side in 50.6% of cases (n=689), piggyback in 42.7% (n=582), and end-to-side in 6.6% (n=90). In total, 882 temporary portacaval anastomosis were carried out. Fifty-five patients presented with one or more complications related to the preservation of the inferior vena cava technique; i.e., overall morbidity was 4.1% (55/1361). Overall mortality was 0.7% (10/1361). Mortality rate for patients who presented with surgical complication was 18%. A total of 64 complications were recorded: 57 (89%) were in the perioperative or immediate postoperative period and 7 (11%) were postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: These retrospective, descriptive results show significant advantages in favor of side-to-side anastomosis in terms of vascular complications. Certain factors should be evaluated specifically at pretransplant assessment to prevent certain serious complications; principally, these are anatomic factors of the recipient (inferior vena cava included in segment I, anatomic abnormalities of the inferior vena cava) and graft size. Depending on these factors, surgeons must be able to adapt the orthotopic liver transplantation, either before or during orthotopic liver transplantation, preferring the standard technique.

Experimental assessment of the risk of tumor recurrence after laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the risk of tumor recurrence after laparoscopic cecal resection (LCR) of colonic carcinoma in the rat. METHODS: The experimental cancer consisted of one million cells (DHK/K12), incorporated in an extracellular matrix, placed and secured to the cecal serosa in 110 BD9 rats. Four weeks later, all animals were reoperated through a laparotomy to control tumor growth, and animals with diffuse carcinomatosis were excluded. Eligible animals were randomized either to laparoscopic cecal resection (group LCR, n = 10), to open resection (group OCR, n = 13), or to a control group without resection (group C, n = 13). Resection was always considered as macrocopically complete. All animals were killed 4 weeks after the resection to determine the tumor recurrence and quantify carcinomatosis. RESULTS: We noted diffuse carcinomatosis in 70% of rats in groups C and LCR versus 23% in group OCR (p = 0.038). For tumors noted as S- (not extending outside the serosa), diffuse carcinomatosis was observed in all animals of group C (3 of 3), in 6 of 8 in group LCR, and 0 of 6 in group OCR (p = 0.004). The rate of port site or incisional metastases was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results demonstrated the deleterious impact of the laparoscopy for resection of large bowel malignancy. LCR increased significantly the incidence of a diffuse carcinomatosis even when performed for locally noninvasive tumors (S-).