Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Mal Infect ; 48(2): 130-135, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) practices in a French rural area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study assessing knowledge, practices, and limitations of OPAT use among hospital practitioners (HP), family physicians (FP), and private nurses (PN). RESULTS: OPAT (mainly ceftriaxone and penicillins) was used by 69.6%, 73.3%, and 97.7% of the 23 HPs, 45 FPs, and 46 PNs mostly for respiratory or urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and/or multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Overall, 65.2% of HPs and 37.8% of FPs were in contact with an infectious disease specialist. Knowledge of OPAT benefits and risks was lower for FPs than HPs. The main obstacles were the patient's geographic isolation (HPs), the availability of a venous catheter, the lack of training (FPs), and the expected OPAT-associated overwork (PNs). CONCLUSION: OPAT practice is weak in rural areas. Declared obstacles constitute fields of improvement for its essential expansion.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , France , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Parenteral Nutrition , Rural Health Services , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...