Lack of association between four biomarkers and persistent post-concussion symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury.

Approximately 15 % of individuals who sustained a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) develop persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). We hypothesized that blood biomarkers drawn in the Emergency Department (ED) could help predict PPCS. The main objective of this project was to measure the association between four biomarkers and PPCS at 90 days post mild TBI. We conducted a prospective cohort study in seven Canadian EDs. Patients aged ≥ 14 years presenting to the ED within 24 h of a mild TBI who were discharged were eligible. Clinical data and blood samples were collected in the ED, and a standardized questionnaire was administered 90 days later to assess the presence of symptoms. The following biomarkers were analyzed: S100B protein, Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE), cleaved-Tau (c-Tau) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP). The primary outcome measure was the presence of PPCS at 90 days after trauma. Relative risks and Areas Under the Curve (AUC) were computed. A total of 595 patients were included, and 13.8 % suffered from PPCS at 90 days. The relative risk of PPCS was 0.9 (95 % CI: 0.5-1.8) for S100B ≥ 20 pg/mL, 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.6-1.5) for NSE ≥ 200 pg/mL, 3.4 (95 % CI: 0.5-23.4) for GFAP ≥ 100 pg/mL, and 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.6-1.8) for C-Tau ≥ 1500 pg/mL. AUC were 0.50, 0.50, 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. Among mild TBI patients, S100B protein, NSE, c-Tau or GFAP do not seem to predict PPCS. Future research testing of other biomarkers is needed to determine their usefulness in predicting PPCS.

Subjective and objective burden and psychological distress in care partners of older adults with traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: In care partners of older persons (65 years and older) having sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI), the objectives were (a) to describe subjective burden (emotional, social, financial, and physical burden), objective burden (new roles and responsibilities), and psychological distress at 4 months postinjury, and (b) to explore the predictors of subjective burden and psychological distress. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: This is an observational study of care partners of older adults with TBI (n = 46; Mage = 65.2 years, SD = 11.2, 87% female). Participants completed the Zarit Burden Interview, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Brain Injury Complaint Questionnaire (measuring difficulties of the injured older adult perceived by the care partner), and the modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. RESULTS: A majority of care partners (88%) reported at least one form of objective burden (e.g., increased/decreased time spent in certain activities post-TBI), 29% perceived at least mild subjective burden, and 27% reported either significant anxiety or depressive symptoms. Linear regressions indicated that a higher number of difficulties reported regarding the injured person and poorer perceived social support predicted higher subjective burden and psychological distress. A younger age of the care partner also predicted a higher subjective burden. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study provides a better understanding of the potential impacts of TBI in older age for care partners. Future research should examine how to support adequately care partners in their psychological adaptation after TBI in an elderly person. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Development of practice recommendations based on the Canadian Syncope Risk Score and identification of barriers and facilitators for implementation.

BACKGROUND: Wide variations in emergency department (ED) syncope management exist. The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) was developed to predict the probability of 30-day serious outcomes after ED disposition. Study objectives were to evaluate the acceptability of proposed CSRS practice recommendations among providers and patients, and identify barriers and facilitators for CSRS use to guide disposition decisions. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 41 physicians involved in ED syncope and 35 ED patients with syncope. We used purposive sampling to ensure a variety of physician specialties and CSRS patient risk levels. Thematic analysis was completed by two independent coders with consensus meetings to resolve conflicts. Analysis proceeded in parallel with interviews until data saturation. RESULTS: The majority (97.6%; 40/41) of physicians agreed with discharge of low risk (CSRS ≤ 0) but opined that 'no follow up' changed to 'follow-up as needed'. Physicians indicated current practices do not align with the medium-risk recommendation to discharge patients with 15-day monitoring (CSRS = 1-3; due to lack of access to monitors and timely follow-up) and the high-risk recommendation (CSRS ≥ 4) to potentially discharge patients with 15-day monitoring. Physicians recommended brief hospitalization of high-risk patients due to patient safety concerns. Facilitators included the CSRS-based patient education and scores supporting their clinical gestalt. Patients reported receiving varying levels of information regarding syncope and post-ED care, were satisfied with care received and preferred less resource intensive options. CONCLUSION: Our recommendations based on the study results were: discharge of low-risk patients with physician follow-up as needed; discharge of medium-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring and brief hospitalization of high-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring if discharged. Patients preferred less resource intensive options, in line with CSRS recommended care. Implementation should leverage identified facilitators (e.g., patient education) and address the barriers (e.g., monitor access) to improve ED syncope care.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La prise en charge des syncopes par les services d'urgence varie considérablement. Le Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) a été mis au point pour prédire la probabilité d'une issue grave à 30 jours après la prise en charge par le service des urgences. Les objectifs de l'étude étaient d'évaluer l'acceptabilité des recommandations pratiques proposées par le CSRS parmi les prestataires et les patients, et d'identifier les barrières et les facilitateurs de l'utilisation du CSRS pour guider les décisions de disposition. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené des entretiens semi-structurés avec 41 médecins impliqués dans la syncope aux urgences et 35 patients souffrant de syncope aux urgences. Nous avons utilisé un échantillonnage raisonné pour assurer une variété de spécialités médicales et de niveaux de risque pour les patients du CSRS. L'analyse thématique a été réalisée par deux codeurs indépendants, avec des réunions de consensus pour résoudre les conflits. L'analyse s'est déroulée parallèlement aux entretiens jusqu'à saturation des données. RéSULTATS: La majorité (97,6 % ; 40/41) des médecins étaient d'accord avec la sortie des patients à faible risque (CSRS ≤ 0), mais ont estimé que " pas de suivi " devait être remplacée par " suivi en fonction des besoins ". Les médecins ont indiqué que leurs pratiques actuelles ne sont pas conformes à la recommandation à risque moyen de faire sortir les patients avec une surveillance de 15 jours (CSRS = 1-3 ; en raison du manque d'accès aux moniteurs et au suivi en temps opportun) et à la recommandation à risque élevé (CSRS ≥ 4) de potentiellement faire sortir les patients avec une surveillance de 15 jours. Les médecins ont recommandé une brève hospitalisation des patients à haut risque pour des raisons de sécurité. Les facilitateurs comprenaient l'éducation des patients basée sur le CSRS et les scores soutenant leur gestalt clinique. Les patients ont déclaré avoir reçu différents niveaux d'information concernant la syncope et les soins post-urgence, étaient satisfaits des soins reçus et préféraient des options moins gourmandes en ressources. CONCLUSIONS: Nos recommandations basées sur les résultats de l'étude sont les suivantes : sortie des patients à faible risque avec suivi par un médecin si nécessaire ; la sortie des patients à risque moyen avec une surveillance cardiaque de 15 jours et une brève hospitalisation des patients à risque élevé avec une surveillance cardiaque de 15 jours en cas de sortie. Les patients ont préféré des options moins gourmandes en ressources, conformément aux soins recommandés par le CSRS. La mise en œuvre devrait s'appuyer sur les facilitateurs identifiés (par exemple, l'éducation des patients) et s'attaquer aux obstacles (par exemple, le contrôle de l'accès) pour améliorer les soins aux urgences en cas de syncope.

A Canadian consensus-based list of urgent and specialized in-hospital trauma care interventions to assess the accuracy of prehospital trauma triage protocols: a modified Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Injury severity scales have traditionally been used to assess the performance of prehospital trauma triage protocols, but they correlate weakly with the urgent needs of specialized trauma care interventions. This study aimed to develop a list of in-hospital urgent and specialized trauma care interventions that require direct transport to the highest-level trauma centre within the catchment area. METHODS: Based on a list of potential participants we obtained using data on training, experience, geographic location, affiliations and role within key trauma organizations, we recruited multidisciplinary trauma experts (including prehospital, emergency, surgery and intensive care clinicians, epidemiologists and clinician/decision-makers) from across Canada to complete a 3-round modified Delphi survey. We conducted a literature review of the criteria used to define urgent and specialized trauma care, and included all diagnostic and therapeutic interventions presented in previously published studies in the list of interventions to present to the panellists. The final list was determined by our advisory committee, 5 clinicians with experience in trauma care. Participants were asked to rate their level of agreement for potentially including the 38 items as urgent and specialized trauma care interventions on a 9-point Likert scale. Interventions were retained if more than 67% of participants moderately or strongly agreed (7-9 on the Likert scale). Interventions that did not reach consensus were presented again in the subsequent round. RESULTS: Twenty-three panellists were recruited. The response rate was 91%, 96% and 83% for the 3 rounds. After the Delphi process, 30 of the 38 interventions, including endotracheal intubation, blood product administration and angioembolization, and abdominal, thoracic, neurosurgical, spinal and/or orthopedic operations (excluding hip or limb surgery, and toe or finger amputation), were selected. Hospital admission to the intensive care unit and/or for observation of brain, spinal, thoracic or abdominal injuries were also retained. CONCLUSION: We developed a Canadian consensus-based list of urgent and specialized in-hospital trauma care interventions requiring direct transportation to a major trauma centre. This list should help standardize assessments of current protocols and derive new triage tools.

Cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury in older adults: associations with social participation and health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: To describe objective and subjective cognitive functioning older adults who sustained TBI at age 65 or over, and to determine whether cognitive functioning is associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and social participation. METHOD: The sample consisted of 40 individuals with TBI (mean age = 73 years; 65% mild, 35% moderate/severe TBI). On average 15 months post-injury, they completed measures of objective and subjective cognitive functioning (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified, Alphaflex, Medical Outcomes Study Cognitive Functioning Scale), HRQoL (SF-12), and social participation (Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective). RESULTS: Mean score for objective cognitive functioning was lower than normative values, while mean scores for executive functioning and subjective cognitive functioning were comparable to normative values. There was no relationship between objective and subjective measures. Subjective cognitive functioning and (to a lesser extent) global objective cognitive functioning were significantly associated with mental HRQoL but not with physical HRQoL or social participation. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the importance of considering both subjective perception and objective performance when assessing and intervening on cognition to promote better mental HRQoL in older adults with TBI.

Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common problem. Depending on diagnostic criteria, 13 to 62% of those patients develop persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). The main objective of this prospective multi-center study is to derive and validate a clinical decision rule (CDR) for the early prediction of PPCS. Patients aged ≥14 years were included if they presented to one of our seven participating emergency departments (EDs) within 24 h of an mTBI. Clinical data were collected in the ED, and symptom evolution was assessed at 7, 30 and 90 days post-injury using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ). The primary outcome was PPCS at 90 days after mTBI. A predictive model called the Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule (PoCS Rule) was developed using the methodological standards for CDR. Of the 1083 analyzed patients (471 and 612 for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively), 15.6% had PPCS. The final model included the following factors assessed in the ED: age, sex, history of prior TBI or mental health disorder, headache in ED, cervical sprain and hemorrhage on computed tomography. The 7-day follow-up identified additional risk factors: headaches, sleep disturbance, fatigue, sensitivity to light, and RPQ ≥21. The PoCS Rule had a sensitivity of 91.4% and 89.6%, a specificity of 53.8% and 44.7% and a negative predictive value of 97.2% and 95.8% in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The PoCS Rule will help emergency physicians quickly stratify the risk of PPCS in mTBI patients and better plan post-discharge resources.

The impact of post-intubation hypotension on length of stay and mortality in adult and geriatric patients: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between standard post-intubation hypotension (< 90 mmHg) and in-hospital mortality. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the association of post-intubation hypotension and length of stay and to assess the impact of increasing post-intubation hypotension threshold to 110 mmHg on hospital length of stay and 48 h-mortality in patients aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS: Design and setting: A cohort of patients admitted in a level-1 trauma centre emergency department (ED) between November 2011 and July 2016. INCLUSION CRITERIA: aged ≥ 16 with available pre-intubation vital signs, intubation performed in ≤ 3 attempts with no surgical access needed. MEASURES: Prospective electronic data collection was used for clinical data. MAIN OUTCOME: 48-h in-hospital mortality. SECONDARY OUTCOME: hospital length of stay. ANALYSES: Univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 586 patients were included. The mean age was 56.3 ± 18.8 years and 37% were aged ≥ 65 years. Within 60 min of intubation, 224 (38%) patients had at least one systolic blood pressure measure < 90 mmHg and 164(28%) had at least two measures. The < 110 mmHg threshold showed a total of 377 patients (64%) had at least one systolic blood pressure measure < 110 mmHg and 286 (49%) had at least two measures. We found no significant difference in the risk of mortality overall and in stratified-age groups and no association with increased hospital length of stay using both post-intubation hypotension thresholds. CONCLUSION: Post-intubation hypotension was recorded in one out of three patients in the ED but we found no association between post-intubation hypotension and 48-h in-hospital mortality overall in adults or geriatric patients.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Évaluer l'association entre l'hypotension post-intubation selon le seuil standard (< 90 mmHg) et la mortalité hospitalière. Les objectifs secondaires étaient d'évaluer l'association entre l'hypotension post-intubation et la durée de séjour et d'évaluer l'impact d'augmenter le seuil d'hypotension post-intubation à 110 mmHg sur la durée de séjour à l'hôpital et la mortalité à 48 heures chez les patients âgés de ≥ 65 ans. MéTHODES: Devis et contexte: Une cohorte de patients admis au département d'urgence d'un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 entre 06/2011 et 05/2016. Critères d'inclusion: âge ≥ 16 ans avec signes vitaux pré-intubation disponibles, intubation réalisée en ≤ 3 tentatives sans accès chirurgical. Mesures: Les données cliniques ont été colligées électroniquement de façon prospective. Issue primaire: Mortalité hospitalière à 48 heures. Issue secondaire: durée du séjour à l'hôpital. Analyses: Analyses univariées et multivariées. RéSULTATS: Un total de 586 patients ont été inclus. L'âge moyen était de 56,3 ± 18,8 ans et 37% étaient âgés de ≥ 65 ans. Dans les 60 min suivant l'intubation, 224 (38%) patients avaient au moins une mesure de tension artérielle systolique < 90 mmHg et 164 (28%) avaient au moins deux mesures. Avec le seuil de < 110 mmHg, un total de 377 patients (64%) avaient au moins une mesure de tension artérielle systolique < 110 mmHg et 286 (49%) en avaient au moins deux. Nous n'avons constaté aucune différence significative dans le risque de mortalité dans l'ensemble et dans différentes strates d'âge, et aucun lien avec l'augmentation de la durée du séjour à l'hôpital en utilisant les deux seuils d'hypotension post-intubation. CONCLUSION: L'hypotension post-intubation a été enregistrée chez un patient sur trois au département d'urgences mais nous n'avons trouvé aucune association entre l'hypotension post-intubation et la mortalité hospitalière à 48 heures, que ce soit dans une population adulte ou chez les patients âgés.

Anxiety symptoms and disorders in the first year after sustaining mild traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The goals of the present study were (a) to document the prevalence of anxiety-related disorders and anxiety symptoms at 4, 8, and 12 months postinjury in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) while considering preinjury history of anxiety disorders and (b) to verify whether the presence of anxiety in the first months after mTBI was associated with more symptoms present 1 year after the injury. Research Method/Design: One hundred and twenty participants hospitalized after an accident and having sustained mTBI were assessed at 4, 8, and 12 months postaccident with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and questionnaires assessing fatigue, irritability, perceived stress, cognitive difficulties, depression, insomnia, and pain. RESULTS: At 4 months, 23.8% of participants presented with at least one anxiety-related disorder compared with 15.2% at 8 months and 11.2% at 12 months. Overall, 32.5% presented with at least one anxiety disorder over the first 12 months post-mTBI. Participants with a history of anxiety (20.5%) were significantly more anxious after their accident. Individuals who were anxious 4 months after the accident presented with more symptoms in different areas 12 months postinjury compared with nonanxious individuals. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The present results highlight that anxiety should be evaluated and managed carefully as it appears to be a key factor in the persistence of other mTBI-related symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Personalised risk prediction following emergency department assessment for syncope.

BACKGROUND: Published risk tools do not provide possible management options for syncope in the emergency department (ED). Using the 30-day observed risk estimates based on the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS), we developed personalised risk prediction to guide management decisions. METHODS: We pooled previously reported data from two large cohort studies, the CSRS derivation and validation cohorts, that prospectively enrolled adults (≥16 years) with syncope at 11 Canadian EDs between 2010 and 2018. Using this larger cohort, we calculated the CSRS calibration and discrimination, and determined with greater precision than in previous studies the 30-day risk of adjudicated serious outcomes not identified during the index ED evaluation depending on the CSRS and the risk category. Based on these findings, we developed an on-line calculator and pictorial decision aids. RESULTS: 8233 patients were included of whom 295 (3.6%, 95% CI 3.2% to 4.0%) experienced 30-day serious outcomes. The calibration slope was 1.0, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.91). The observed risk increased from 0.3% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.5%) in the very-low-risk group (CSRS -3 to -2) to 42.7% (95% CI 35.0% to 50.7%), in the very-high-risk (CSRS≥+6) group (Cochrane-Armitage trend test p<0.001). Among the very-low and low-risk patients (score -3 to 0), ≤1.0% had any serious outcome, there was one death due to sepsis and none suffered a ventricular arrhythmia. Among the medium-risk patients (score +1 to+3), 7.8% had serious outcomes, with <1% death, and a serious outcome was present in >20% of high/very-high-risk patients (score +4 to+11) including 4%-6% deaths. The online calculator and the pictorial aids can be found at: https://teamvenk.com/csrs CONCLUSIONS: 30-day observed risk estimates from a large cohort of patients can be obtained for management decision-making. Our work suggests very-low-risk and low-risk patients may be discharged, discussion with patients regarding investigations and disposition are needed for medium-risk patients, and high-risk patients should be hospitalised. The online calculator, accompanied by pictorial decision aids for the CSRS, may assist in discussion with patients.

A Delphi study to identify prehospital and emergency department trauma care modifiers for older adults.

Background: Older patients (age ≥ 65 yr) with trauma have increased morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients; this is partly explained by undertriage of older patients with trauma, resulting in lack of transfer to a trauma centre or failure to activate the trauma team. The objective of this study was to identify modifiers to the prehospital and emergency department phases of major trauma care for older adults based on expert consensus. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study between May and September 2019 to identify major trauma care modifiers for older adults based on national expert consensus. The panel consisted of 24 trauma care professionals from across Canada from the prehospital and emergency department phases of care. The survey consisted of 16 trauma care modifiers. Three online survey rounds were distributed. Consensus was defined a priori as a disagreement index score less than 1. Results: There was a 100% response rate for all survey rounds. Three new trauma care modifiers were suggested by panellists. The panel achieved consensus agreement for 17 of the 19 trauma care modifiers. The prehospital modifier with the strongest agreement to transfer to a trauma centre was a respiratory rate less than 10 or greater than 20 breaths/min or need for ventilatory support. The emergency department modifier with the strongest level of agreement was obtaining 12-lead electrocardiography following the primary and secondary survey. Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi process, an expert panel agreed on 17 trauma care modifiers for older adults in the prehospital and emergency department settings. These modifiers may improve the delivery of trauma care for older adults and should be considered when developing local and national trauma guidelines.

Contexte: Les polytraumatisés âgés (≥ 65 ans) sont exposés à un risque plus grand de morbidité et de mortalité comparativement aux jeunes polytraumatisés; cela s'explique en partie par un triage inadéquat des patients âgés victimes de traumatismes, qui fait en sorte qu'on ne les oriente pas vers un centre de traumatologie ou qu'on ne fait pas intervenir l'équipe de traumatologie. L'objectif de la présente étude était d'identifier les éléments de soins à modifier au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence lors de la prise en charge des cas de traumatismes graves chez les adultes âgés, sur la base d'un consensus d'experts. Méthodes: Nous avons procédé à une analyse Delphi modifiée entre mai et septembre 2019 pour recenser les éléments de soins à modifier chez les polytraumatisés âgés à partir d'un consensus national d'experts. Le panel d'experts se composait de 24 professionnels en traumatologie du Canada entier chargés des soins au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence. Le questionnaire portait sur 16 éléments à modifier en traumatologie. Trois questionnaires successifs ont été distribués en ligne. Le consensus était défini a priori par un indice de désaccord inférieur à 1. Résultats: Le taux de réponse a été de 100 % pour les 3 questionnaires. Les membres du comité ont suggéré 3 nouveaux éléments à modifier. Le comité est arrivé à un consensus pour 17 des éléments à modifier sur 19. L'élément préhospitalier ayant fait l'objet du plus solide consensus concernant le transfert vers un centre de traumatologie était une fréquence respiratoire inférieure à 10 ou supérieure à 20 respirations/minute ou la nécessité d'une assistance respiratoire. L'élément à modifier parmi les soins prodigués à l'urgence ayant fait l'objet du plus solide consensus après les 2 premiers questionnaires était l'obtention d'un électrocardiogramme à 12 dérivations. Conclusion: À l'aide d'une analyse Delphi modifiée, un comité d'expert s'est entendu sur 17 éléments de soins à modifier chez les polytraumatisés âgés au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence. Ces éléments pourraient améliorer les soins aux adultes âgés et méritent d'être pris en compte lors de la création de lignes directrices locales et nationales en traumatologie.

Post-concussion symptoms in sports-related mild traumatic brain injury compared to non-sports-related mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: To compare post-concussion symptoms in patients who sustained a sports-related mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) to those with non-sports-related mild TBI at 7 and 90 days post-injury. METHODS: This prospective multicentre cohort study took place in seven Canadian Emergency Departments (ED). Non-hospitalized patients aged ≥ 14 years with a documented mild TBI that occurred ≤ 24 h of ED visit and a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥ 13 were included. Main outcome measure was the presence of ≥ 3 symptoms on the Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire at 90 days post-injury. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of (1) individual Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire symptom, (2) total Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire score ≥ 21 and (3) return to normal daily activities. Adjusted risk ratios (RR) were calculated. RESULTS: 1727 patients were included, 363 (21.0%) sustained a sports-related mild TBI. Similar proportions of patients with ≥ 3 symptoms, a Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire score ≥ 21 and those who returned to their normal daily activities were observed at 7 and 90 days post-injury. Sports-related mild TBI patients were at higher risk of poor concentration [RR: 1.3 (95% CI 1.05-1.54)] and non-return to sports activities [RR: 2.2 (95% CI 1.69-2.94)] at 7 days post-injury. At 90 days, sports-relate -mild TBI patients reported less fatigue [RR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.51-0.98)] and feeling of dizziness [RR: 0.6 (95% CI 0.35-0.99)]. CONCLUSION: Patients who sustained sports-related mild TBI could be at lower risk of experiencing symptoms such as fatigue and dizziness 90 days post-injury. Clinicians should be mindful that non-sports-related mild TBI patients may experience more post-concussion symptoms and that the level of physical activity may influence the patient's rehabilitation.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Comparer les symptômes post-commotionnels chez les patients ayant subi un traumatisme cranio-cérébral léger (TCCL) lié au sport à ceux qui ont un TCCL non lié au sport à 7 et 90 jours post-traumatisme. MéTHODES: Cette étude prospective de cohorte multicentrique s'est déroulée dans sept Départements d'urgence (DU) du Canada. Les patients non hospitalisés âgés de ≥ 14 ans ayant subi un TCCL ≤ 24 heures avant leur visite au DU et présentant un score de Glasgow de ≥ 13 ont été inclus. Le critère principal de jugement était la présence d'au moins 3 symptômes au Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire 90 jours après le traumatisme. Les critères de jugement secondaires étaient la prévalence de 1) chacun des symptômes du Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire 2) score total du Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire ≥ 21 et 3) retour aux activités habituelles. Des risques relatifs ajustés (RR) ont été calculés. RéSULTATS: Un total de 1727 patients a été inclu, dont 363 (21,0 %) ont subi un TCCL lié au sport. Des proportions similaires de patients présentant ≥ 3 symptômes, un score ≥ 21 au Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire et de participants ayant repris leurs activités habituelles ont été observés à 7 et 90 jours après la blessure. Les patients avec TCCL lié au sport présentaient un risque plus élevé de manque de concentration (RR: 1,3 [IC à 95 % = 1,05-1,54]) et de non-retour aux activités sportives (RR: 2,2 [IC à 95 % = 1,69-2,94]) à 7 jours après la blessure. À 90 jours, les patients avec TCCL lié au sport ont signalé moins de fatigue (RR: 0,7 [IC à 95 % = 0,51-0,98]) et de sensation de vertige (RR: 0,6 [IC à 95 % = 0,35-0,99]). CONCLUSION: Les patients qui ont subi un TCCL lié au sport seraient moins à risque de présenter des symptômes tels que de la fatigue et des étourdissements 90 jours après la blessure. Les cliniciens doivent être conscients que les patients avec TCCL non lié au sport peuvent présenter davantage de symptômes post-commotionnels et que le niveau d'activité physique peut influencer la réadaptation du patient.

S100B protein level for the detection of clinically significant intracranial haemorrhage in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a subanalysis of a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is challenging and overuse of head CT in the ED is a major problem. Several studies have attempted to reduce unnecessary head CTs following a mTBI by identifying new tools aiming to predict intracranial bleeding. Higher levels of S100B protein have been associated with intracranial haemorrhage following a mTBI in previous literature. The main objective of this study is to assess whether plasma S100B protein level is associated with clinically significant brain injury and could be used to reduce the number of head CT post-mTBI. METHODS: Study design: secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study conducted between 2013 and 2016 in five Canadian EDs. Inclusion criteria: non-hospitalised patients with mTBI with a GCS score of 13-15 in the ED and a blood sample drawn within 24 hours after the injury. Data collected: sociodemographic and clinical data were collected in the ED. S100B protein was analysed using ELISA. All CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist blinded to the biomarker results. Main outcome: the presence of clinically important brain injury. RESULTS: 476 patients were included. Mean age was 41±18 years old and 150 (31.5%) were women. Twenty-four (5.0%) patients had a clinically significant intracranial haemorrhage. Thirteen patients (2.7%) presented a non-clinically significant brain injury. A total of 37 (7.8%) brain injured patients were included in our study. S100B median value (Q1-Q3) was: 0.043 µg/L (0.008-0.080) for patients with clinically important brain injury versus 0.039 µg/L (0.023-0.059) for patients without clinically important brain injury. Sensitivity and specificity of the S100B protein level, if used alone to detect clinically important brain injury, were 16.7% (95% CI 4.7% to 37.4%) and 88.5% (95% CI 85.2% to 91.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Plasma S100B protein level was not associated with clinically significant intracranial lesion in patients with mTBI.

Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms: An Expert Consensus-Based Definition Using the Delphi Method.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an expert consensus definition of persistent postconcussion symptoms following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). PARTICIPANTS: Canadian healthcare professionals caring for patients with mTBI. DESIGN: Online Delphi process. MAIN MEASURES: A first Delphi round documented important dimensions or criteria to consider when defining persistent symptoms. Expert opinions were then resubmitted in 4 subsequent Delphi rounds and their relevance was rated using a 9-point Likert scale. An item with a median rating of 7 or more and a sufficient level of agreement were considered consensual. RESULTS: After 5 rounds, consensus was reached on a set of criteria that can be summarized as follows: presence of any symptom that cannot be attributed to a preexisting condition and that appeared within hours of an mTBI, that is still present every day 3 months after the trauma, and that has an impact on at least one sphere of a person's life. CONCLUSION: This Delphi consensus proposes a set of criteria that support a more uniform definition of persistent symptoms in mild TBI among clinicians and researchers. This definition may help clinicians better identify persistent postconcussion symptoms and improve patient management.

Adapting two American Decision Aids for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to the Canadian Context Using the Nominal Group Technique.

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are patient-focused tools that have the potential to reduce the overuse of head computed tomography (CT) scans. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create a consensus among Canadian mild traumatic brain injury and emergency medicine experts on modifications required to adapt two American decision aids about head CT use for adult and paediatric mild traumatic brain injury to the Canadian context. METHODS: We invited 21 Canadian stakeholders and the two authors of the American decision aids to a Nominal Group Technique consensus meeting to generate suggestions for adapting the decision aids. This method encourages idea generation and sharing between team members. Each idea was discussed and then prioritised using a voting system. We collected data using videotaping, writing material and online collaborative writing tools. The modifications proposed were analysed using a qualitative thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants took part in the meeting, including researchers and clinician researchers (n = 9; 43%), patient partners (n = 3; 14%) and decision makers (n = 2; 10%). A total of 84 ideas were generated. Participants highlighted the need to clarify the purpose of the decision aids, the nature of the problem being addressed and the target population. The tools require sociocultural adaptations, better identification of their target population, better description of head CT utility, advantages and related risks, modification of the visual and written representation of the risk of brain injury and head CT use, and locally adapted, patient follow-up plans. CONCLUSIONS: This study based on a Nominal Group Technique identified several adaptations for two American decision aids about head CT use for mild traumatic brain injury to support their use in Canada's different healthcare, social, cultural and legal context. These adaptations concerned the target users of the decision aids, the information presented, and how the benefits and risks were communicated in the decision aids. Future steps include prototyping the two adapted decision aids, conducting formative evaluations with actual emergency department patients and clinicians, and measuring the impact of the adapted tools on CT scan use.

A mild traumatic brain injury (also called concussion) can happen when the brain moves around in the skull after an impact to the head. A concussion is not a brain bleed and you cannot see a concussion. Concussions do not show up on a computed tomography (CT) scan. Brain bleeds do. Computed tomography scans are specialised X-ray machines that can detect serious brain injuries. Unfortunately, CT scan use also exposes patients to radiation and a future increased risk of cancer.Shared decision making involves health professionals and patients making decisions together based on the best available evidence, health professionals' experience, and patients' values and preferences. Shared decision making improves appropriate diagnostic test use.Two decision aids created in the USA are available to facilitate shared decision making regarding the use of head CT scans for patients with concussion. These decision aids are not fully adapted for use in Canada because the healthcare, social and legal context is different. Our study brought together patients and experts in the field of concussion and shared decision making to analyse these decision aids and propose adaptations that would increase their acceptance in Canadian emergency departments. We used a technique called the Nominal Group Technique to create a consensus about the most important changes to make to both original decision aids. The main adaptations needed for the Canadian context concerned avoiding information about cost and removing any information that does not change clinical management. This project will help us adapt two decision aids for clinical use in Canada and support appropriate CT scan use for patients with concussion.

Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of hospital admission after emergency department evaluation for syncope is unclear. We sought to determine the association between hospital admission and detection of serious adverse events, and whether this varied according to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort of patients assessed in the emergency department for syncope. We compared patients admitted to hospital and discharged patients, using propensity scores to match 1:1 for risk of a serious adverse event. The primary outcome was detection of a serious adverse event in hospital for admitted patients or within 30 days after emergency department disposition for discharged patients. RESULTS: We included 8183 patients, of whom 743 (9.1%) were admitted; 658/743 (88.6%) were matched. Admitted patients had higher odds of detection of a serious adverse event (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-7.4), nonfatal arrhythmia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.9-8.8) and nonarrhythmic serious adverse event (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.9-13.5). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.7) or detection of ventricular arrhythmia (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-6.0). Differences between admitted and discharged patients in detection of serious adverse events were greater for those with a CSRS indicating medium to high risk (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Patients with syncope were more likely to have serious adverse events identified within 30 days if they were admitted to hospital rather than discharged from the emergency department. However, the benefit of hospital admission is low for patients at low risk of a serious adverse event.

Clinically significant traumatic intracranial hemorrhage following minor head trauma in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (T-ICH) following minor head trauma in older adults. Secondary objective was to investigate the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies on T-ICH incidence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study extracted data from electronic patient records. The cohort consisted of patients presenting after a fall and/or head injury and presented to one of five ED between 1st March 2010 and 31st July 2017. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 65 years old and a minor head trauma defined as an impact to the head without fulfilling criteria for traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: From the 1,000 electronic medical records evaluated, 311 cases were included. The mean age was 80.1 (SD 7.9) years. One hundred and eighty-nine (189) patients (60.8%) were on an anticoagulant (n = 69), antiplatelet (n = 130) or both (n = 16). Twenty patients (6.4%) developed a clinically significant T-ICH. Anticoagulation and/or antiplatelets therapies were not associated with an increased risk of clinically significant T-ICH in this cohort (Odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% CI 0.9-8.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older adults presenting to the ED following minor head trauma, the incidence of clinically significant T-ICH was 6.4%.

Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.

Importance: The management of patients with syncope in the emergency department (ED) is challenging because no robust risk tool available has been recommended for clinical use. Objective: To validate the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in a new cohort of patients with syncope to determine its ability to predict 30-day serious outcomes not evident during index ED evaluation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study conducted at 9 EDs across Canada included patients 16 years and older who presented to EDs within 24 hours of syncope. Patients were enrolled from March 2014 to April 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline characteristics, CSRS predictors, and 30-day adjudicated serious outcomes, including arrhythmic (arrhythmias, interventions for arrhythmia, or unknown cause of death) and nonarrhythmic (myocardial infarction, structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, or hemorrhage) serious outcomes, were collected. Calibration and discrimination characteristics for CSRS validation were calculated. Results: A total of 3819 patients were included (mean [SD] age 53.9 [22.8] years; 2088 [54.7%] female), of whom 139 (3.6%) experienced 30-day serious outcomes, including 13 patients (0.3%) who died. In the validation cohort, there were no differences between the predicted and observed risk, the calibration slope was 1.0, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93). The empirical probability of a 30-day serious outcome during validation was 3.64% (95% CI, 3.09%-4.28%) compared with the model-predicted probability of 3.17% (95% CI, 2.66%-3.77%; P = .26). The proportion of patients with 30-day serious outcomes increased from 3 of 1631 (0.3%) in the very-low-risk group to 40 of 78 (51.3%) in the very-high-risk group (Cochran-Armitage trend test P < .001). There was a similar significant increase in the serious outcome subtypes with increasing CSRS risk category. None of the very-low-risk and low-risk patients died or experienced ventricular arrhythmia. At a threshold score of -1 (2145 of 3819 patients), the CSRS sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% (95% CI, 93.8%-99.6%) and 44.3% (95% CI, 42.7%-45.9%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: The CSRS was successfully validated and its use is recommended to guide ED management of patients when serious causes are not identified during index ED evaluation. Very-low-risk and low-risk patients can generally be discharged, while brief hospitalization can be considered for high-risk patients. We believe CSRS implementation has the potential to improve patient safety and health care efficiency.

Head CT overuse in children with a mild traumatic brain injury within two Canadian emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: The validated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Network (PECARN) rule helps determine the relevance of a head computerized tomography (CT) for children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We sought to estimate the potential overuse of head CT within two Canadian emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children seen in 2016 in a paediatric Level I (site 1) and a general Level II (site 2) trauma centre. We reviewed charts to determine the appropriateness of head CT use according to the PECARN rule in a random subset of children presenting with head trauma. Simple descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and forty-six eligible patients younger than 17 years consulted during the study period. Of the 203 randomly selected cases per setting, 16 (7.9%) and 24 (12%), respectively from sites 1 and 2 had a head CT performed. Based on the PECARN rule, we estimated the overuse for the younger group (<2 years) to be below 3% for both hospitals without significant difference between them. For the older group (≥2 years), the overuse rate was higher at site 2 (9.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8 to 17% versus 1.2%, 95% CI: 0.2 to 6.5%, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Both EDs demonstrated overuse rates below 10% although it was higher for the older group at site 2. Such low rates can potentially be explained by the university affiliation of both hospitals and by two Canadian organizations working to raise awareness among physicians about the overuse of diagnostic tools and dangers inherent to radiation.

Adapting the Canadian CT head rule age criteria for mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: With the ageing population, the prevalence of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) among older patients is increasing, and the age criteria of the Canadian CT head rule (CCHR) is challenged by many emergency physicians. We modified the age criteria of the CCHR to evaluate its predictive capacity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma centre ED of all mTBI patients 65 years old and over with an mTBI between 2010 and 2014. Main outcome was a clinically important brain injury (CIBI) reported on CT. The clinical and radiological data collection was standardised. Univariate analyses were performed to measure the predictive capacities of different age cut-offs at 70, 75 and 80 years old. RESULTS: 104 confirmed mTBI were included; CT scan identified 32 (30.8%) CIBI. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the CCHR were 100% (89.1 to 100) and 4.2% (0.9 to 11.7) for a modified criteria of 70 years old; 100% (89.1 to 100) and 13.9% (6.9 to 24.1) for 75 years old; and 90.6% (75.0 to 98.0) and 23.6% (14.4 to 35.1) for 80 years old. Furthermore, modifying the age criteria to 75 years old showed a reduction of CT up to 25% (n=10/41) among the individuals aged 65-74 without missing CIBI. CONCLUSION: Adjusting the age criteria of the Canadian CT head rule to 75 years old could be safe while reducing radiation and ED resources. A future prospective study is suggested to confirm the proposed modification.

Detection of S-100ß Protein in Plasma and Urine After a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

This study assessed whether S-100ß protein could be measured in urine when detectable in plasma after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Clinical data, plasma and urine samples were collected for the 46 adult patients prospectively enrolled in the emergency department (ED) of a Level 1 trauma center. S-100ß protein concentrations were analysed using ELISA. S-100ß protein was detectable in 91% and 71% of plasma and urine samples, but values were not correlated (r = 0.002). Urine sampling would have been a non-invasive procedure, but it does not appear to be useful in the ED during the acute phase after an mTBI.

Détection de la protéine S-100ß dans le plasma et l'urine à la suite d'un traumatisme cranio-cérébral léger (TCCL). Cette étude a cherché à évaluer dans quelle mesure la teneur en protéine S-100ß peut être mesurée dans l'urine après avoir été détectée dans le plasma, et ce, à la suite d'un TCCL. Des données cliniques ainsi que des échantillons de plasma et d'urine ont alors été collectés chez quarante-six patients adultes recrutés de façon prospective dans le service d'urgence d'un centre tertiaire de traumatologie. La teneur en protéine S-100ß a été analysée au moyen de la méthode immuno-enzymatique ELISA. La protéine S-100ß s'est avérée détectable dans respectivement 91 % et 71 % des échantillons de plasma et d'urine. Cela dit, les valeurs obtenues ne sont pas apparues corrélées (r = 0,002). Le fait de recourir à des échantillons d'urine aurait pu représenter une procédure non-invasive ; cependant, elle ne semble pas utile dans un service d'urgence lors de la phase aigüe consécutive à un TCCL.