Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709254

ABSTRACT

Significant events impacting healthcare over the last several years have been associated with escalating rates of healthcare-associated infections. This has resulted in increased efforts to reinstitute well-established and evidence-based infection prevention practices, particularly for central line associated bloodstream infections. However, implementation of prevention initiatives beyond central lines has not received the same level of acknowledgement and response as being a considerable risk to patients. This article, authored by infection prevention, infectious disease, and vascular access professionals, provides emerging perspectives and technical aspects associated with the complete lifecycle of a vascular access device. The intent is to provide insight and perspective into enhancing current IP practices in the acute care hospital setting. This will also help prepare hospitals for upcoming broader surveillance and intervention activities aimed at reducing Hospital Onset Bacteremia and Fungemia (HOB) associated with all types of vascular access devices.

2.
Ann Intern Med ; 163(6 Suppl): S1-40, 2015 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26369828

ABSTRACT

Use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has grown substantially in recent years. Increasing use has led to the realization that PICCs are associated with important complications, including thrombosis and infection. Moreover, some PICCs may not be placed for clinically valid reasons. Defining appropriate indications for insertion, maintenance, and care of PICCs is thus important for patient safety. An international panel was convened that applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop criteria for use of PICCs. After systematic reviews of the literature, scenarios related to PICC use, care, and maintenance were developed according to patient population (for example, general hospitalized, critically ill, cancer, kidney disease), indication for insertion (infusion of peripherally compatible infusates vs. vesicants), and duration of use (≤5 days, 6 to 14 days, 15 to 30 days, or ≥31 days). Within each scenario, appropriateness of PICC use was compared with that of other venous access devices. After review of 665 scenarios, 253 (38%) were rated as appropriate, 124 (19%) as neutral/uncertain, and 288 (43%) as inappropriate. For peripherally compatible infusions, PICC use was rated as inappropriate when the proposed duration of use was 5 or fewer days. Midline catheters and ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheters were preferred to PICCs for use between 6 and 14 days. In critically ill patients, nontunneled central venous catheters were preferred over PICCs when 14 or fewer days of use were likely. In patients with cancer, PICCs were rated as appropriate for irritant or vesicant infusion, regardless of duration. The panel of experts used a validated method to develop appropriate indications for PICC use across patient populations. These criteria can be used to improve care, inform quality improvement efforts, and advance the safety of medical patients.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/statistics & numerical data , Catheterization, Peripheral/statistics & numerical data , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Critical Illness/therapy , Device Removal , Hospitalization , Humans , Michigan , Neoplasms/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Unnecessary Procedures
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 38(7): 1105-17, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22614241

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide clinicians with an evidence-based overview of all topics related to ultrasound vascular access. METHODS: An international evidence-based consensus provided definitions and recommendations. Medical literature on ultrasound vascular access was reviewed from January 1985 to October 2010. The GRADE and the GRADE-RAND methods were utilised to develop recommendations. RESULTS: The recommendations following the conference suggest the advantage of 2D vascular screening prior to cannulation and that real-time ultrasound needle guidance with an in-plane/long-axis technique optimises the probability of needle placement. Ultrasound guidance can be used not only for central venous cannulation but also in peripheral and arterial cannulation. Ultrasound can be used in order to check for immediate and life-threatening complications as well as the catheter's tip position. Educational courses and training are required to achieve competence and minimal skills when cannulation is performed with ultrasound guidance. A recommendation to create an ultrasound curriculum on vascular access is proposed. This technique allows the reduction of infectious and mechanical complications. CONCLUSIONS: These definitions and recommendations based on a critical evidence review and expert consensus are proposed to assist clinicians in ultrasound-guided vascular access and as a reference for future clinical research.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adult , Catheterization, Central Venous/standards , Catheterization, Peripheral/standards , Child , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Ultrasonography, Doppler/standards , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards
6.
J Infus Nurs ; 32(4): 203-11, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19605999

ABSTRACT

Infiltration and extravasation are risks of intravenous administration therapy involving unintended leakage of solution into the surrounding tissue. Consequences range from local irritation to amputation. While immediate action using appropriate measures (ie, dilution, extraction, antidotes, and supportive treatments) can decrease the need for surgical intervention, many injuries may be prevented by following established policy and procedures. However, timely surgical intervention, when necessary, can prevent more serious adverse outcomes. Clinicians should be prepared to act promptly when an event occurs. Thorough incident documentation helps determine whether infusion care meets the standard of practice and is a keystone to medicolegal defense.


Subject(s)
Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/nursing , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/prevention & control , Infusions, Intravenous/adverse effects , Infusions, Intravenous/nursing , Humans , Risk Management
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...