Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AORN J ; 77(2): 322-4, 327-338; quiz 341, 343-4, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12619849

ABSTRACT

In the United States, as many as two million women (ie, 22%) each year will consult a physician about menorrhagia (ie, excessive menstrual bleeding). Seven hundred thousand hysterectomies are performed in the United States each year for symptomatic menorrhagia. The procedure cost, risk, and complications, combined with the fact that a large number of posthysterectomy specimens show no abnormality, suggest that the majority of hysterectomies performed for menorrhagia are unnecessary. These data suggest that a less invasive procedure that destroys the endometrial lining but preserves the uterus would be a beneficial procedure for patients with excessive uterine bleeding. Treatment for menorrhagia may include hormone therapy, endometrial curettage, endometrial ablation, and hysterectomy. Women who are opposed to hysterectomy and those for whom other treatment options were unsuccessful can consider ablation rather than hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/nursing , Endometrium/surgery , Hysterectomy , Menorrhagia/therapy , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Catheterization/methods , Electrosurgery/adverse effects , Electrosurgery/methods , Electrosurgery/nursing , Female , Hot Temperature/therapeutic use , Humans , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Menorrhagia/nursing , Menorrhagia/surgery , Perioperative Nursing/methods , Unnecessary Procedures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...