Tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates osteopenia caused by depletion of antioxidants.

We recently found that estrogen deficiency leads to a lowering of thiol antioxidant defenses in rodent bone. Moreover, administration of agents that increase the concentration in bone of glutathione, the main intracellular antioxidant, prevented estrogen-deficiency bone loss, whereas depletion of glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) administration provoked substantial bone loss. It has been shown that the estrogen-deficiency bone loss is dependent on TNFalpha signaling. Therefore, a model in which estrogen deficiency causes bone loss by lowering antioxidant defenses predicts that the osteopenia caused by lowering antioxidant defenses should similarly depend on TNFalpha signaling. We found that the loss of bone caused by either BSO administration or ovariectomy was inhibited by administration of soluble TNFalpha receptors and abrogated in mice deleted for TNFalpha gene expression. In both circumstances, lack of TNFalpha signaling prevented the increase in bone resorption and the deficit in bone formation that otherwise occurred. Thus, depletion of thiol antioxidants by BSO, like ovariectomy, causes bone loss through TNFalpha signaling. Furthermore, in ovariectomized mice treated with soluble TNFalpha receptors, thiol antioxidant defenses in bone remained low, despite inhibition of bone loss. This suggests that the low levels of antioxidants in bone seen after ovariectomy are the cause, rather than the effect, of the increased resorption. These experiments are consistent with a model for estrogen-deficiency bone loss in which estrogen deficiency lowers thiol antioxidant defenses in bone cells, thereby increasing reactive oxygen species levels, which in turn induce expression of TNFalpha, which causes loss of bone.

FLT3 ligand can substitute for macrophage colony-stimulating factor in support of osteoclast differentiation and function.

Although bone resorption and osteoclast numbers are reduced in osteopetrotic (op/op) mice, osteoclasts are nevertheless present and functional, despite the absence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). This suggests that alternative factors can partly compensate for the crucial actions of M-CSF in osteoclast induction. It was found that when nonadherent bone marrow cells were incubated in RANKL with Flt3 ligand (FL) without exogenous M-CSF, tartrate-resistance acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cells were formed, and bone resorption occurred. Without FL, only macrophagelike TRAP-negative cells were present. Granulocyte-macrophage CSF, stem cell factor, interleukin-3, and vascular endothelial growth factor could not similarly replace the need for M-CSF. TRAP-positive cell induction in FL was not due to synergy with M-CSF produced by the bone marrow cells themselves because FL also enabled their formation from the hemopoietic cells of op/op mice, which lack any M-CSF. FL appeared to substitute for M-CSF by supporting the differentiation of adherent cells that express mRNA for RANK and responsiveness to RANKL. To determine whether FL can account for the compensation for M-CSF deficiency that occurs in vivo, FL signaling was blockaded in op/op mice by the injection of soluble recombinant Flt3. It was found that the soluble receptor induced a substantial decrease in osteoclast number, strongly suggesting that FL is responsible for the partial compensation for M-CSF deficiency that occurs in these mice.

TGF-beta 1 and IFN-gamma direct macrophage activation by TNF-alpha to osteoclastic or cytocidal phenotype.

TNF-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE; also called receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL), osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF), osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL), and TNFSF11) induces the differentiation of progenitors of the mononuclear phagocyte lineage into osteoclasts in the presence of M-CSF. Surprisingly, in view of its potent ability to induce inflammation and activate macrophage cytocidal function, TNF-alpha has also been found to induce osteoclast-like cells in vitro under similar conditions. This raises questions concerning both the nature of osteoclasts and the mechanism of lineage choice in mononuclear phagocytes. We found that, as with TRANCE, the macrophage deactivator TGF-beta(1) strongly promoted TNF-alpha-induced osteoclast-like cell formation from immature bone marrow macrophages. This was abolished by IFN-gamma. However, TRANCE did not share the ability of TNF-alpha to activate NO production or heighten respiratory burst potential by macrophages, or induce inflammation on s.c. injection into mice. This suggests that TGF-beta(1) promotes osteoclast formation not only by inhibiting cytocidal behavior, but also by actively directing TNF-alpha activation of precursors toward osteoclasts. The osteoclast appears to be an equivalent, alternative destiny for precursors to that of cytocidal macrophage, and may represent an activated variant of scavenger macrophage.

Osteoclast lineage commitment of bone marrow precursors through expression of membrane-bound TRANCE.

Osteoclast formation from hemopoietic precursors is induced by TRANCE (also called RANKL, ODF, and OPGL), a membrane-bound ligand expressed by bone marrow stromal cells. Because soluble recombinant TRANCE is a suboptimal osteoclastogenic stimulus, and to eliminate the need for such dependence on stromal cells, membrane-bound TRANCE was expressed in hematopoietic precursors using retroviral gene transfer. Four TRANCE-expressing osteoclast cell lines were established that continuously generate large numbers of multinucleated cells and express tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and calcitonin receptors. The multinuclear cells are long-lived and either fuse continuously with each other and with mononuclear cells to form enormous syncytia, or separate to form daughter multinuclear cells. When formed on bone, but not on plastic, the majority of multinuclear cells develop actin rings on bone, and resorb bone, suggesting that bone matrix may provide additional signals that facilitate osteoclastic functional maturation. Surprisingly, multinuclear cells originate from fusion of proliferating mononuclear cells that strongly express the mature macrophage markers F4/80 and Fc receptor, which are not expressed by osteoclasts. These results indicate that osteoclasts can be derived from F4/80-positive and Fc receptor-positive cells, and that TRANCE induces osteoclastic differentiation partly by suppressing the macrophage phenotype.

A role for TGFbeta(1) in osteoclast differentiation and survival.

Recently, tumour necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE) was shown to be necessary for osteoclast formation. We now report that TGF(beta), a cytokine enriched in bone matrix, is also required. TGF(beta) not only powerfully synergized with TRANCE for induction of osteoclast-like cells (OCL) from bone marrow precursors and monocytes, but OCL formation was abolished by recombinant soluble TGF(beta) receptor II (TGF(beta)sRII). Preincubation in TGF(beta) was as effective as simultaneous incubation with TRANCE. TGF(beta)-preincubation enhanced OCL formation at least partly by preventing the development of resistance to OCL-induction that otherwise occurs when precursors are incubated in M-CSF. OCL formed in TRANCE also showed more rapid apoptosis than OCL in TRANCE plus TGF(beta). Like TGF(beta), incubation on bone matrix prolonged and enhanced the sensitivity of precursors to OCL-induction by TRANCE, and this was reversed by TGF(beta)sRII. Taken together, this data is compelling evidence for a model in which TGF(beta) in matrix or released from bone-lining or other cells maintains and enhances the osteoclast-forming potential of precursors as they migrate towards sites of cell-bound TRANCE. Thus, the specific circumstances necessary for osteoclast formation and survival are TRANCE expression on osteoblastic cells and TGF(beta) in bone.

The role of prostaglandins and nitric oxide in the response of bone to mechanical forces.

We have developed an experimental model whereby bone is exposed to a brief episode of mechanical stimulation, which is followed by bone formation. The earliest response is in osteocytes, which express c-fos and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) within 30-60min. Thirty-six to 72h after loading bone matrix gene expression occurs on bone surfaces. The osteogenic response can be suppressed by a single dose of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) or prostaglandin (PG) synthase inhibitors, if these are administered just before mechanical stimulation: similar doses after stimulation have no effect. There is a later phase of indomethacin-sensitivity associated with COX-2 expression in bone at 6h. Thus, mechanically induced osteogenesis involves early expression of c-fos and IGF-1 by osteocytes, which are believed to be the strain-sensitive cells in bone. Both NOS and PG synthase, either in parallel or in sequence, are crucial to the initial transduction of the mechanical stimulus into an osteogenic response.

Role of nitric oxide and prostaglandins in mechanically induced bone formation.

We have previously shown that prostaglandins (PG) and nitric oxide (NO) are required in the induction of bone formation by mechanical stimulation. We therefore tested the ability of NO donors, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP), and S-nitroso-glutathione (GSNO) to mimic or augment the osteogenic response of bone to a minimal mechanical stimulus. In rats administered vehicle or the vasodilator hydralazine, stimulation of the 8th caudal vertebra increased bone formation. In animals treated with SNAP or GSNO, there was significant potentiation of this osteogenic response. The bone formation rate in nonloaded vertebrae was unaffected by administration of the NO donors. We also found that while inhibition of either PG or NO production at the time of loading caused a partial suppression of c-fos mRNA expression in the loaded vertebrae, administration of indomethacin and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine together markedly suppressed c-fos expression. This suggests that although both PG and NO are required in mechanically induced osteogenesis, they appear to be generated largely independently of each other. Moreover, while exogenous NO potentiates the stimulatory effect of mechanical loading on bone formation, the lack of effect in nonloaded vertebrae suggests that NO is necessary but not sufficient for induction of bone formation.

RoBo-1, a novel member of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor/CD59/Ly-6/snake toxin family selectively expressed in rat bone and growth plate cartilage.

Using differential display polymerase chain reaction, we cloned a novel cDNA named RoBo-1 from rat tibia. RoBo-1 is abundantly expressed in bone, including the hypertrophic chondrocytes of the growth plate where cartilage is remodeled into bone. RoBo-1 mRNA expression increased in response to two modulators of bone metabolism, estradiol and intermittent mechanical loading, suggesting a role in bone homeostasis. The 1.6-kilobase cDNA encodes a 240-amino acid protein with a cysteine spacing pattern, suggesting that RoBo-1 is a novel member of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor/CD59/Ly-6/snake toxin family. Furthermore, the C-terminal contains a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol attachment site, suggesting that it is a cell surface protein similar to other mammalian members of this family. The strongest homology of RoBo-1 is to the snake serum-derived phospholipase A2 inhibitors, which uniquely contain two of the cysteine domains but are secreted proteins. Interestingly, RoBo-1 is likely the first membrane-anchored member of this family containing two cysteine domains. Thus, the tissue specificity, responsiveness to bone protective mediators, along with its relationship to the multifunctional urokinase plasminogen activator receptor/CD59/Ly-6/snake toxin family suggests that RoBo-1 may play a novel role in the growth or remodeling of bone.

Osteocytic expression of mRNA for c-fos and IGF-I: an immediate early gene response to an osteogenic stimulus.

We analyzed the expression, during the osteogenic response of bone to mechanical stimulation, of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a growth factor implicated in bone formation, and c-fos, a protooncogene in which disordered regulation specifically affects bone. Both genes were strongly expressed in osteocytes of mechanically stimulated but not control bones within 30 min of the osteogenic stimulus. IGF-I mRNA expression increased up to 6 h, was restricted to osteocytes, and was strongly suppressed by indomethacin. Although early IGF-I mRNA expression was resistant to cycloheximide, there was a degree of suppression after 6 h, raising the possibility that IGF-I expression might be prolonged by autocrine mechanisms. c-fos mRNA was increased both in osteocytes and on bone surfaces. At both sites, c-fos expression was transient, prolonged by cycloheximide, and was strongly stimulated even in the presence of indomethacin. Thus osteocytes respond to mechanical stimulation with immediate prolonged expression of IGF-I and immediate transient expression of c-fos, implicating osteocytes in the osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation. Moreover, the different spatial distribution and indomethacin sensitivity of c-fos and IGF-I gene expression suggest that at least two signaling pathways are activated in osteocytes during this process.

Sequential analysis of gene expression after an osteogenic stimulus: c-fos expression is induced in osteocytes.

We have recently developed an experimental model whereby mechanical stimulation induces osteogenesis in the caudal vertebrae of rats. We used this model to assess expression of genes induced by mechanical loading. Bulk preparations of mRNA extracted after loading did not show > 2-fold increases in expression of mRNA for matrix proteins or growth factors in Northern blotting analysis. c-jun was undectable. However, c-fos showed a 4-fold increase in expression within 60 mins of loading, before returning to control levels by 4 hrs. This increase was associated with intense signals in in situ hybridization, not seen in any nonloaded vertebrae, for c-fos over cortical osteocytes: thus osteocytes respond to mechanical loading with c-fos expression so strongly as to be visible even in the bulk RNA preparations. The results represent persuasive evidence for a role for osteocytes, and for c-fos, in the osteogenic response of bone to mechanical stimulation.

Increased insulin-like growth factor I mRNA expression in rat osteocytes in response to mechanical stimulation.

We recently developed an experimental model whereby a single 10-min episode of mechanical stimulation induces bone formation in the eighth caudal vertebra of 13-wk-old rats. We used this model to relate the kinetics of the bone-forming response, as measured by administration of fluorescent markers, to an in situ hybridization analysis of changes in mRNA for two matrix proteins (type I collagen and osteocalcin) and a growth factor implicated in the regulation of bone formation [insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). We found that increased fluorochrome labeling was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of trabecular bone surfaces on which transcripts for collagen type I and osteocalcin were detectable, from < 3 to 25% 72 h after loading. IGF-I expression on trabecular surfaces showed a slightly earlier increase. We also noted intense hybridization for IGF-I in osteocytes in the diaphyseal cortex and in metaphyseal trabeculae. This was observed only in loaded bones, within 6 h of loading, and became undetectable in trabecular osteocytes 48 h and cortical osteocytes 120 h after loading. This is the first identification of a specific mRNA species in osteocytes after mechanical stimulation. Its production before the increase in transcription of matrix protein mRNA, and before the transcription of IGF-I mRNA in bone surface cells, represents persuasive evidence for a role for osteocytes, and for IGF-I, in the osteogenic response of bone to mechanical stimulation.

The rate of cancellous bone formation falls immediately after ovariectomy in the rat.

We have recently found that administration of oestradiol-17 beta (OE2) to rats stimulates trabecular bone formation. It is not known, however, whether oestrogen has a similar action on bone formation rate under physiological circumstances. Oestrogen is known to suppress bone resorption, and oestrogen-deficient states in the rat, as in humans, are associated with an increase in bone resorption that entrains an increase in bone formation. To see if the latter masks a relative reduction in bone formation, due to oestrogen deficiency, we measured bone formation very early after ovariectomy, before the resorption-induced increase in bone formation becomes established. To do this, rats were administered fluorochrome labels before and after ovariectomy, spaced at weekly intervals in the first, and 3-day intervals in the second experiment. In both experiments there was a decrease in indices of bone formation in the labelling interval immediately following ovariectomy such that, using the shorter fluorochrome intervals, the mineral apposition rate fell to 69%, the double-labelled surface to 45%, and the bone formation rate to 36% of sham-ovariectomized levels. The reduction was not sustained in the subsequent label intervals, presumably masked by the increase in bone formation attributable to increased resorption. These results suggest that if bone formation is assessed before this resorption-entrained increase in bone formation occurs, oestrogen deficiency is associated with a reduction in dynamic indices of bone formation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Estrogen does not restore bone lost after ovariectomy in the rat.

We recently found that 17 beta-estradiol (E2) not only suppresses bone resorption but also stimulates bone formation in the cancellous bone of female rats. This raises the possibility that E2 treatment might restore the bone lost after ovariectomy in the rat. To test this, 13-week-old rats were ovariectomized (ox). After a further 13 weeks the animals were injected with E2 (4 mg or 40 micrograms/kg daily), human calcitonin (hCT) (3 IU/kg daily), (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP) (0.3 mg/kg twice per week), or a combination of E2 with hCT or AHPrBP, for 8 weeks. The bone volume at the tibial metaphysis of ox animals was approximately 40% of that of sham-operated controls at the end of the experiment. Although the bone volume of ox rats treated with E2 and/or hCT or AHPrBP was slightly higher than that of untreated ox rats, the increase was not significant. Neither E2 alone nor a combination of E2 with hCT or AHPrBP was associated with a higher bone volume than hCT or AHPrBP alone, suggesting no effect of E2 beyond that of inhibition of bone resorption. Histodynamic indices of bone formation were increased in untreated ox rats compared to controls but suppressed in E2-treated, hCT-treated, and AHPrBP-treated animals. These results emphasize the similar responses of rat and human bone, both of which not only show bone loss with estrogen deficiency, preventable by estrogen administration, but also show an inability of estrogen to restore bone lost as a result of estrogen deficiency.

Estrogen induces bone formation on non-resorptive surfaces in the rat.

We have recently found that 17 beta-estradiol (E2) stimulates bone formation in rat cancellous bone, and that this bone formation is suppressed by (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP). To analyse the relationship between bone resorption and bone formation in the action of E2, we injected 13-week-old female rats sequentially with three fluorochromes (calcein, tetracycline and xylenol orange) at 7-day intervals. E2 (40 micrograms/kg) or vehicle was injected daily for 15 days, starting 24 hrs after the first fluorochrome. A third group was injected with AHPrBP (0.3 mg/kg) 24 hrs after the first two fluorochromes. The rats were killed 48 hrs after the third fluorochrome. We found that the perimeter of all three fluorochrome labels was increased by E2. The entire perimeter of the first label was non-crenated. Since the first label was given before E2-administration, this suggests that label that would otherwise have been eluted from the bone surface had been fixed in bone by E2-induced bone formation, which might have occurred either through prolongation of pre-existing bone formation, or induction of bone formation on quiescent surfaces. In either case, our results suggest that resorption did not precede formation at the site of bone formation. Since induction of bone formation by E2 is suppressed by inhibition of bone resorption, this suggests that the coupling of E2-induced formation to resorption in the rat does not necessarily require that formation occurs at the same site as bone resorption.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The progesterone antagonist, RU486 does not affect basal or estrogen-stimulated cancellous bone formation in the rat.

Although it has been suggested that progesterone may have a role in preventing postmenopausal bone loss, a number of studies have shown that progesterone has no additive effect on estrogen therapy. We have recently found that high-dose estrogen stimulates bone formation in rats. The effect of progesterone on this anabolic action of estrogen has not been tested. We therefore investigated the role of progesterone in combination with endogenous or exogenous estrogen on bone formation in rats using RU486, which has been shown to be a potent progesterone antagonist without detectable agonist effects. Three-month-old Wistar female rats were treated for 17 days with RU486, and histomorphometric indices of bone formation were measured at the proximal tibial metaphysis after administration of double fluorochrome labels. Animals treated with RU486 (10 mg/kg) showed no change in either bone formation rate or double-labelled bone surfaces compared to vehicle-treated controls. Estrogen (17 beta-estradiol, 4 mg/kg) increased both indices by more than double compared with controls. RU486 did not affect the indices of increased bone formation in estrogen-treated rats. Estrogen also exhibited inhibition of longitudinal bone growth, while RU486 had no effect either in normal or estrogen-treated animals. These results show that the progesterone antagonist affects neither the stimulatory effect on formation nor the inhibitory effect on longitudinal bone growth by estrogen. These results suggest that progesterone does not play a significant role in either bone formation or bone growth in the rat.

The anabolic action of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on rat trabecular bone is suppressed by (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP).

We have previously found that high doses of 17 beta-estradiol (E2), similar to those seen in late pregnancy, stimulate bone formation in adult rats. In this communication we tested the effects of a combination of E2 and (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP) on bone formation and bone volume in rat bone. E2 (4 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 17 days) stimulated the bone formation rate to 6 times that of control rats. This was reduced by a single administration of AHPrBP (0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously) to 3 times control levels, and by similar daily injections of AHPrBP to levels not significantly different from those of untreated rats. Suppression of bone formation was effected predominantly through a reduction in the percentage of double-labelled surfaces, consistent with reduced osteoblast recruitment. We found only relatively minor effects of AHPrBP on the mineral apposition rate, suggesting that AHPrBP affected osteoblast function less than osteoblast recruitment. Suppression of histodynamic parameters of bone formation by AHPrBP was associated with suppression of the increase in bone volume otherwise induced by E2. The suppression by AHPrBP of the effect of E2 on bone formation contrasted with its lack of effect on other target tissues for E2, since AHPrBP did not affect the E2-induced changes in longitudinal bone growth or uterine weight. These results suggest that AHPrBP inhibits the anabolic effect of estrogen on rat trabecular bone.

17 beta-estradiol stimulates cancellous bone formation in female rats.

Estrogen is generally considered to maintain bone mass through suppression of bone resorption. We have previously demonstrated that administration of pharmacological doses of estrogen increases bone formation in rats. Because such high doses of estrogen might induce bone formation through some mechanism other than the estrogen receptor, we have now assessed the effect of more physiological doses of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on bone formation. Adult female rats (13 weeks and 6 months old) administered E2 (1, 4, 40, 400, and 4 mg/kg daily for 17-21 days) showed a dramatic increase (5- to 8-fold) in cancellous bone formation, attributable to a combination of an increase in the proportion of bone surface actively undertaking bone formation, and an increase in the rate of mineral apposition. Significant anabolism was induced in 6-month-old rats by doses as low as 4 micrograms/kg and in 13-week-old rats by 40 micrograms/kg. Corresponding increases in the proportion of trabecular surface covered by osteoblasts were also observed. Histomorphometric indices of bone resorption were suppressed by estrogen. Estrogen administration caused an increase in bone volume up to 35% over controls, over a 21-day period. Stimulation of bone formation by estrogen showed a similar pattern of dose-responsiveness to recognized physiological targets of E2: suppression of longitudinal growth and uterine growth. These results suggest that stimulation of cancellous bone formation is a physiological action of E2 in the rat.

The anabolic effect of 17 beta-oestradiol on the trabecular bone of adult rats is suppressed by indomethacin.

We have previously demonstrated that administration of oestrogen, at doses sufficient to raise serum concentrations to those seen in late pregnancy, increases trabecular bone formation in the metaphysis of adult rats. To determine whether prostaglandins (PGs), which have been shown to induce osteogenesis in vivo, play a role in the induction of bone formation by oestrogen, 13-week-old female rats were given daily doses of 4 mg 17 beta-oestradiol (OE2)/kg for 17 days, alone or with indomethacin (1 mg/kg). The rats were also given double fluorochrome labels and at the end of the experiment tibias were subjected to histomorphometric assessment. Treatment with OE2 suppressed longitudinal bone growth and increased uterine wet weight, as expected, and neither response was affected by indomethacin. Oestrogen also induced a threefold increase in trabecular bone formation in the proximal tibial metaphysis, which resulted in a substantial increase in trabecular bone volume. As previously observed, the increase in bone formation was predominantly due to an increase in osteoblast recruitment (as judged by an increase in the percentage of bone surface showing double fluorochrome labels), with only a minor increase in the activity of mature osteoblasts (as judged by the mineral apposition rate). Indomethacin abolished the increase in osteoblastic recruitment, but the activity of mature osteoblastic cells remained high. The bone formation rate and bone volume remained similar to controls. The results suggest that PG production may be necessary for the increased osteoblastic recruitment induced by oestrogen, but not to mediate the effects of oestrogen on the activity of mature osteoblasts.