Assessment of the heat stability of seven rapid HIV assays.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Rapid Diagnostic Tests (HIV RDTs) are robust, quick to perform, effective diagnostic tools. The stability of seven commonly used RDTs for detecting antibody to HIV was assessed during exposure to temperatures above 30°C, the usual maximum recommended by manufacturers. The aim of the study was to determine if HIV RDTs retain their testing outcomes after exposure to higher temperatures. At two testing sites, seven RDTs were exposed to a short heat shock (60°C for 72 hours) as might occur during transport. RDTs were exposed to ambient (22 or 30°C), warm (35 or 37°C) or hot (45°C) temperatures for up to 90 days. Testing was performed at five intervals on a panel of seven positive and three negative plasma samples. Results showed no changes consistent with altered testing outcomes over time and/or temperature when test indicators were compared with the control indicators. Only one HIV RDT achieved 100% consensus with reference results at all four storage temperatures (median 97.5%, lowest 74% for RDT5 at 45°C). Testing outcomes in a limited sample panel showed six of seven HIV RDT kits were relatively robust despite exposure to higher than recommended temperatures.

Assessing proficiency of interpretation of rapid human immunodeficiency virus assays in nonlaboratory settings: ensuring quality of testing.

Rapid antibody tests for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) offer an effective means of providing a timely result of HIV serostatus to individuals. The increased use of rapid HIV antibody tests outside the laboratory has highlighted the need for new, cost-effective quality assurance methods to be developed for use in nonlaboratory-based and resource-limited settings. Photographed rapid HIV test results were used in a modified external quality assessment scheme to assess the interpretation proficiency and, therefore, to assess the feasibility of using this method as a basis for a quality assessment program for nonlaboratory-based testing. Participants (n = 148), both experienced and inexperienced in the performance and interpretation of rapid HIV testing, interpreted the photographed results of five rapid HIV assays. These were scored according to the degree of technical discordance. Error scores were grouped according to each participant's technical experience. The accuracy of interpretation for four of the five assays was between 80 and 97%, indicating that the photographed results of samples, including those difficult to read or borderline difficult to read, can be used to assess the proficiency of test operators in interpreting results. Participants had greater difficulty in interpreting samples of weak reactivity; this was consistent across the five assays. Experience played an important role in accurate interpretation, with experienced laboratory participants exhibiting greater proficiency (P < 0.05) in interpreting the results of three of the five rapid HIV assays. It was established that photographed results of rapid HIV assays could be interpreted with accuracy and demonstrated that prior experience resulted in a more accurate interpretation performance.