Growth Patterns Between Ages 0 and 36 Months Among US Children With Orofacial Cleft: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how young children with orofacial cleft grow over time. OBJECTIVE: To characterize longitudinal growth patterns from ages 0 to 36 months in US children with an orofacial cleft. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Children with cleft lip, cleft lip and palate, or cleft palate who were younger than age 36 months at a hospital encounter between 2010 and 2019 (N = 1334) were included. The setting was a US tertiary care children's hospital with a cleft center that serves a 5-state region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Weight-for-age z scores (WAZ) and length-for-age z scores (LAZ). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Longitudinal growth patterns were characterized using generalized linear mixed models to estimate mean WAZ and LAZ from age 0 to 36 months. RESULTS: Growth in infants with cleft slowed dramatically during the first 3 to 4 months of life, rebounded with catch-up growth until age 12 months for cleft lip and cleft palate and until age 36 months for cleft lip and palate. When comparing populations, children with any type of cleft demonstrated subpar growth compared with World Health Organization standards. Growth deficits were more common in those with cleft lip and palate and cleft palate compared with those with cleft lip. The intraclass coefficient showed that most of the variability in the WAZ (65%) was between individuals, whereas 35% was within an individual. The intraclass coefficient for LAZ showed that most of the variability in the LAZ (74%) was between individuals, whereas 26% was within an individual. The proportion of variance attributable to cleft type and/or comorbidities accounted for <5% of the variance for WAZ and LAZ. WAZ and LAZ were lower in children with comorbidities than those without comorbidities with cleft and World Health Organization standards. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with cleft lip and palate, cleft palate, and a cleft with comorbidities have higher rates of poor growth than peers with cleft lip and a cleft with no comorbidities, respectively.

Optimizing Surgical Treatment of Internationally Adopted Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Understanding the Family Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the experience of families with children undergoing cleft surgery following adoption from a country outside the United States. To identify factors, including the timing of surgery, that influence family function throughout the surgical experience. DESIGN: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with parents of internationally adopted children postrepair of cleft lip and/or cleft palate and coded by a multidisciplinary study team. Mixed methods were used to contextualize themes derived from the parent interviews. RESULTS: Twenty parent interviews were conducted, and four core themes were identified: (1) parental anxieties prior to surgery, (2) considerations for the timing of surgery, (3) impact of the surgical experience on the child and family, and (4) modifiable sociocontextual factors. Parents considered a strong child bond with at least one parent and the ability of the child to communicate basic needs to be important before undergoing surgery. In retrospect, parents generally felt that the surgical experience did not have a negative impact on their child or their families and that the surgical experience may have even facilitated bonding and attachment with their child. Acceleration of family bonding was expressed more often by parents of children who were adopted at older than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, parents reported that cleft surgery soon after international adoption did not appear to impair child bonding or adjustment. Specific family and provider factors that could optimize the experience for families were identified.

Craniofacial summer cAMP: an educational experience for campers, cAMP staff, and the craniofacial team.

Children with congenital or acquired craniofacial conditions often have complex medical and surgical healthcare needs. To provide holistic care to this unique pediatric population, we must seek methods to address the psychosocial needs of children living with a craniofacial difference. Our multidisciplinary craniofacial team concluded our second-year participating in overnight summer camps for our patients with cleft-craniofacial conditions. We worked with 2 different organizations to host the camps each year. Over the course of 2 years, we enrolled more than 100 children, 7-15 years of age, in 1-week, overnight camp experiences. Campers participated in activities to promote team building, self-esteem, confidence, and social awareness. We share the perspectives of the campers and their parents, the camp staff, and the craniofacial team members.