Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic studies of the taxoid derivative RPR 109881A administered as a 1-hour or a 3-hour infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose, the optimal infusion duration and pharmacokinetics of the semisynthetic taxoid derivative RPR 109881A, given as a 1-h or 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RPR109881A was administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion to 34 patients (study 1) with oral steroids as pre-medication. In a subsequent study, 29 patients were treated at the recommended dose or at the dose immediately below (study 2); the first 14 patients received RPR 109881A as a 3-h infusion, while the subsequent 15 were randomized to receive the drug as a 1-h or 3-h infusion. The pharmacokinetics of RPR109881A was studied in plasma and urine and for selected patients in some biological fluids (cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, ascitis). RESULTS: In study 1, the dose was escalated from 15 to 105 mg/m(2), at which dose two of five patients presented dose-limiting toxicities with febrile neutropenia (FN) after the first cycle, thus defining the MTD. The dose of 90 mg/m(2), at which grade 3/4 neutropenia was almost universal with FN in 18%, was recommended for phase II. At 90 mg/m(2) the incidence of diarrhea, fatigue and alopecia were 59, 29 and 70%, respectively. The results of study 2 were comparable to those of study 1, thus recommending the 1-h infusion duration for phase II evaluation. RPR 109881A exhibited a high total body clearance, a large distribution volume and long terminal half-life of 20 h. RPR 109881A was detected in cerebrospinal fluid shortly after the end of 1-h infusion. Three objective responses were observed in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, including a patient with brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The antitumor activity in NSCLC, the reproducible profile of toxicity and above all the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier make RPR 109881A worthy of further disease-oriented clinical development.

Phase I dose-finding study of a new taxane, RPR 109881A, administered as a one-hour intravenous infusion days 1 and 8 to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of a novel taxane, RPR 109881A, administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and treated according to a modified continual reassessment method from a starting dose of 7.5 mg/m(2) to 52.5 mg/m(2). Detailed pharmacokinetic analyses of blood and urine were performed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle. Toxicity was monitored weekly. RESULTS: DLT consisting of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was seen in three of six patients at 52.5 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was also seen in five of six patients treated at this dose (four of six in the first cycle). At the next lower dose level, 45 mg/m(2) toxicity was moderate, with only one of 12 patients experiencing severe diarrhea and grade 4 granulocytopenia with associated infection. Drug concentrations were consistent with a three-compartment open model. The total-body clearance suggests a linear dose-concentration relationship. RPR 109881A has a high clearance (mean, 42.6 L/h/m(2)), a large volume of distribution (mean, 952 L/m(2)), and a long terminal half-life (mean, 24 hours). There was no drug accumulation between days 1 and 8. One partial response was seen in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The RD of RPR 109881A given as a 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is 45 mg/m(2). At this dose the drug is well tolerated and should be further studied.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m(2), 50/175 mg/m(2), 60/210 mg/m(2), 60/250 mg/m(2), 60/275 mg/m(2), 60/300 mg/m(2), and 70/250 mg/m(2). Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m(2) and 60/300 mg/m(2); the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m(2), respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

A phase II study: docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7-29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1-7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0-8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0-4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m(-2) by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1-9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m(-2). Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1-50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4-52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h(-1) m(-2) and an area under the curve of 6.00 microg ml(-1) h(-1) was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance.

Continual reassessment methods in phase I trials of the combination of two drugs in oncology.

Most phase I trials in oncology use standard methods for treating successive groups of patients with increasing doses in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). These methods have been criticized because they treat many patients at suboptimal dose levels, and do not provide an accurate estimation of the best dose level. Continual reassessment methods for the study of toxicity in single agent phase I trials have recently been advocated since they present many advantages over traditional methods. Although the advantages of these methods are recognized by most clinical investigators, their use is not widespread and their advantages have not yet been universally accepted. A maximum likelihood continual reassessment method was conducted retrospectively and compared to the originally planned standard method in a two drug combination phase I trial in order to study its applicability in this setting. Calculations from the binomial distributions and simulations were used for identifying the MTD, for the proportion of patients treated at the MTD or at one dose level just below, and for the proportion of patients treated at doses above the MTD. If the new method had been applied in this study, the MTD would have been reached much earlier, since, most of the time, higher dose levels were recommended. This result shows the feasibility of the new method in a two-drug setting and its use should be encouraged since fewer patients are treated at suboptimal dose levels or at dose levels above the MTD.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of docetaxel: results of phase I and phase II trials.

The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel as investigated in Phase I and Phase II trials are discussed. Phase I trials have shown that docetaxel exhibits linear pharmacokinetics consistent with a three-compartment model. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of the results of 22 nonrandomized Phase II trials with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling showed that the interpatient variability of docetaxel pharmacokinetics is mainly related to body surface area and hepatic function. The effect of body surface area on clearance does not present a problem, since the dose of docetaxel is adjusted for body size. However, patients with impaired liver function are at increased risk of serious adverse effects (febrile neutropenia, severe infections, severe stomatitis, and toxic death) during treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/ m2. Patients with impaired liver function should receive a reduced dose (75 mg/m2). The presence of liver metastases without impaired liver function had no effect on docetaxel's clearance or safety, suggesting that a dose of 100 mg/m2 is well tolerated in such patients. Docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics determined in Phase I and Phase II trials indicate a need to adjust the dosage for body surface area and liver function.