Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 22(3): 160-4, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) gastrointestinal colonization prevalence in high-risk hospitalized patients and to assess the cost and utility of this laboratory-based surveillance. SETTING: Large university teaching hospital. DESIGN: Quarterly prevalence culture survey of 50 stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin A assay from October 1996 through June 1999 (n=526). Screening culture survey of all C difficile-positive stool specimens from July 1998 through June 1999 (n=140). PATIENTS: Specimens for analysis were collected from patients who were admitted to the hospital and who had C difficile toxin A testing ordered. Patient samples were excluded from analysis if they were obtained from patients not hospitalized at UCLA Medical Center, if the C difficile toxin assay result was indeterminate, or if the patient was known to have previous VRE colonization or infection. RESULTS: During quarterly surveillance, VRE was detected in 19.8%, C difficile toxin A in 9.5%, and both VRE and C difficile toxin A in 3.2% of stool specimens submitted for C difficile toxin assay. Patients whose stool specimens were positive for C difficile toxin A were significantly more likely than those whose specimens were negative to have VRE detected (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5). Based on these findings, in July 1998, we began routine screening of all C difficile-positive stool specimens for VRE. From July 1998 through June 1999, 58 (41.4%) of 140 patients with C difficile-positive specimens had VRE newly detected in the stool. The combined cost of the two laboratory-based surveillance strategies was approximately $62 per VRE-positive patient identified and $5,800 per year. CONCLUSION: Quarterly surveillance of stool submitted for C difficile assay combined with screening all C difficile-positive stools is a cost-effective and efficient strategy for detecting VRE stool colonization among high-risk hospitalized patients. Such a laboratory-based surveillance should be included as part of a comprehensive program to limit nosocomial VRE transmission.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterotoxins/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Laboratories, Hospital/economics , Population Surveillance , Vancomycin Resistance , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Prevalence
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 30(1): 195-7, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10619754

ABSTRACT

From March 1997 through November 1997, 8 allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients developed Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia on the hematology service at UCLA Medical Center (Los Angeles). Five of these patients had undergone transplantation during the same hospitalization that S. maltophilia bacteremia was detected (case patients). Compared with 7 concurrently hospitalized allogenic BMT patients (control patients), the 5 case patients were more likely to have been hospitalized in room A (P=.045), to have severe neutropenia on the culture date (P=.028), to have a longer duration of severe neutropenia (P=.05), to have severe mucositis (P=. 028), and to have received total parenteral nutrition (P=.028). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that 2 of 3 isolates from case patients hospitalized in room A were identical. In allogenic BMT patients, severe neutropenia and severe mucositis may promote infection with S. maltophilia by impairing host defenses.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Disease Outbreaks , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Stenotrophomonas/classification , Stenotrophomonas/isolation & purification , Bacteremia/etiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Mouth Mucosa , Neutropenia/complications , Parenteral Nutrition, Total , Risk Factors , Stenotrophomonas/genetics , Stomatitis/complications , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
3.
Clin Lab Med ; 19(3): 601-19, vii, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10549428

ABSTRACT

Although the intestinal amebae that infect humans are not thought of as classic agents of food-borne disease, food plays an important role in the transmission of these protozoa. This is particularly true for areas of the world where the organisms are endemic. Transmission of most intestinal protozoa occurs by the fecal-oral route via contaminated food or water. Among the four genera of amebae that infect man, only Entamoeba histolytica and Blastocystis hominis are causes of disease. This article focuses on E. histolytica because of the organism's medical and economic impact on humans. In addition, the epidemiology, control, and laboratory diagnosis of these protozoa are addressed.


Subject(s)
Amebiasis/parasitology , Amoeba/pathogenicity , Blastocystis hominis/pathogenicity , Dysentery, Amebic/parasitology , Entamoeba histolytica/pathogenicity , Food Parasitology , Amebiasis/diagnosis , Amebiasis/epidemiology , Amebiasis/therapy , Animals , Blastocystis hominis/classification , Blastocystis hominis/growth & development , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Dysentery, Amebic/diagnosis , Dysentery, Amebic/epidemiology , Dysentery, Amebic/therapy , Entamoeba histolytica/classification , Entamoeba histolytica/growth & development , Global Health , Humans , Life Cycle Stages , Tropical Climate
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 34(8): 2027-9, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8818906

ABSTRACT

The present multicenter study proposes broth microdilution quality control (QC) ranges for the antimicrobial agents ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, penicillin G-novobiocin, pirlimycin, premafloxacin, and spectinomycin, which are used in veterinary practice. Six separate laboratories tested replicates of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended QC organisms (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212) on medium lots both common and unique to all laboratories. The proposed ranges were within 3 or 4 log2 dilution steps of the modal MICs for all organism-antimicrobial agent pairs, depending on their MIC distributions. With > or = 94.7% of all MIC results being within the proposed QC ranges, all combinations tested comply with NCCLS guidelines and all have been accepted by the NCCLS subcommittee developing susceptibility testing procedures for veterinary laboratories.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Quality Control , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Laboratories , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...