Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 41(12): 2204-2205, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32883665

ABSTRACT

We report the cases of 2 patients hospitalized in our intensive care unit with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 infection in whom brain MR imaging showed an unusual DWI pattern with nodular and ring-shaped lesions involving the periventricular and deep white matter. We discuss the possible reasons for these findings and their relationship to the infection.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , COVID-19/complications , Adult , Brain/virology , Humans , Leukoencephalopathies/diagnostic imaging , Leukoencephalopathies/pathology , Leukoencephalopathies/virology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroimaging/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/virology , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Crit Care Med ; 29(4): 891-5, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11373490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We studied the in-hospital course, long-term prognosis, and functional status of elderly patients with life-threatening cardiogenic pulmonary edema requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Semiprospective evaluation. SETTING: Twelve intensive care units and one emergency prehospital medical department in university hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients, aged >75 yrs, with life-threatening cardiogenic pulmonary edema requiring invasive airway management during the prehospital phase between January 1994 and January 1999 were included. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were studied, of which 55 were included in the prospective phase and 24 during the retrospective phase. The age range was 75-99 yrs, with a mean age of 82.4 +/- 5.9. The male/female ratio was 35:44. The in-hospital mortality was 26.6%. The mean follow-up time for all 58 survivors was 23 months (range, 2-56 months). Among those discharged, survival at 1 yr was 69%. At 3 months after hospital discharge, 49 (87%) patients lived at home, 46 (82%) were able to bathe themselves, 35 (62%) could walk at least one block, and 34 (61%) could climb one flight of stairs. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after severe pulmonary edema requiring endotracheal intubation in a very elderly cohort has a predictably high mortality, although not related directly to the degree of presenting respiratory compromise. However, approximately 50% of the overall cohort returned to relatively good functional status, despite advanced age and a severely compromised presentation. Aggressive airway management appears, therefore, justified in this select group of patients.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Geriatrics , Intubation, Intratracheal , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/mortality , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 16(8): 945-9, 1997.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9750642

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate acute pain in prehospital setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey. PATIENTS: All eligible patients during a 3-month-period, excepted children less than 10-year-old. METHOD: Pain intensity was evaluated by verbal rating scale with 5 points (VRS), visual analog scale (VAS), demand for antalgics by the patient and the relief obtained. These data were collected at the beginning (T0) and the end (Tend) of medical management. Analgesic treatments were let at the physician's choice. RESULTS: A series of 255 patients were included (mean age 58 +/- 1.5 SEM, sex-ratio 57M/43F). Among them, 42% experienced pain at VRS. VAS could be used in 60% of patients. VRS evaluated by the patient was correlated to the VAS (P < 0.001). Among those with significant pain (defined by a VAS > or = 30 mm), only 31% asked for analgesia and 64% received analgesics. Pain scales (VRS and VAS) were significantly improved (P < 0.001) at the end of the medical management, except for patients who did not receive any treatment. However, mean VAS was still above 30 mm, even in patients receiving analgesics. Only 49% of patients expressed a good relief at the end of the medical management. CONCLUSION: Acute pain is frequently observed in prehospital emergency medicine. Pain scales such as VRS and VAS are used easily and convenient for the assessment of pain intensity in this context. However, even if pain is correctly evaluated, it is still inadequately treated. The reasons of these inadequacies must be assessed and corrected with pain treatment protocols including opioids.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Pain Measurement , Pain/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesia , Data Collection , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/drug therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...