Cytokine Release by Microglia Exposed to Neurologic Injury Is Amplified by Lipopolysaccharide.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and morbidity in the trauma population. Microglia drive the secondary neuroinflammatory response after TBI. We sought to determine if the microglial response to neurologic injury was exacerbated by a second stimulus after exposure to neurologic injury. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats (age 2-3 wk) were divided into injured and noninjured groups. Injured rats underwent a controlled cortical impact injury; noninjured rats remained naïve to any injury and served as the control group. Primary rat microglia were isolated and applied to in vitro cultures. After incubation for 24 h, the microglia were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or norepinephrine. Twenty-four hours after stimulation, cell culture supernatant was collected. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) production were measured by standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: When compared to noninjured microglia, LPS induced a significantly greater production of TNF-α in microglia isolated from the injured ipsilateral (versus noninjured = 938.8 ± 155.1, P < 0.0001) and injured contralateral hemispheres (versus noninjured = 426.6 ± 155.1, P < 0.0001). When compared to microglia from noninjured cerebral tissue, IL-6 production was significantly greater after LPS stimulation in the injured ipsilateral hemisphere (mean difference versus noninjured = 9540 ± 3016, P = 0.0101) and the contralateral hemisphere (16,700 ± 3016, P < 0.0001). Norepinephrine did not have a significant effect on IL-6 or TNF-α production. CONCLUSIONS: LPS stimulation may amplify the release of proinflammatory cytokines from postinjury microglia. These data suggest that post-TBI complications, like sepsis, may propagate neuroinflammation by augmenting the proinflammatory response of microglia.

Biomarkers of cetuximab resistance in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Objective: In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), cetuximab [a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)] has been shown to improve overall survival when combined with radiotherapy in the locally advanced setting or with chemotherapy in first-line recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) setting, respectively. While biomarkers of resistance to cetuximab have been identified in metastatic colorectal cancer, no biomarkers of efficacy have been identified in HNSCC. Here, we aimed to identify biomarkers of cetuximab sensitivity/resistance in HNSCC. Methods: HNSCC patients treated with cetuximab at the Curie Institute, for whom complete clinicopathological data and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue collected before cetuximab treatment were available, were included. Immunohistochemistry analyses of PTEN and EGFR were performed to assess protein expression levels. PIK3CA and H/N/KRAS mutations were analyzed using high-resolution melting (HRM) and Sanger sequencing. We evaluated the predictive value of these alterations in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Hot spot activating PIK3CA and KRAS/HRAS mutations were associated with poor PFS among HNSCC patients treated with cetuximab in the first-line R/M setting, but not among HNSCC patients treated with cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy. Loss of PTEN protein expression had a negative predictive value among HNSCC patients treated with cetuximab and radiotherapy. High EGFR expression did not predict cetuximab sensitivity in our patient population. Conclusions: Hot spot activating PIK3CA and RAS mutations predicted cetuximab resistance among HNSCC patients in the first-line R/M setting, whereas loss of PTEN protein expression predicted resistance to cetuximab when combined to radiotherapy.