Patient-specific prescriber feedback can increase the rate of osteoporosis screening and treatment: results from two national interventions.

Osteoporosis interventions targeting older Australians and clinicians were conducted in 2008 and 2011 as part of a national quality improvement program underpinned by behavioural theory and stakeholder engagement. Uptake of bone mineral density (BMD) tests among targeted men and women increased after both interventions and sustained increases in osteoporosis treatment were observed among men targeted in 2008. PURPOSE: Educational interventions incorporating patient-specific prescriber feedback have improved osteoporosis screening and treatment among at-risk patients in clinical trials but have not been evaluated nationally. This study assessed uptake of BMD testing and osteoporosis medicines following two national Australian quality improvement initiatives targeting women (70-79 years) and men (75-85 years) at risk of osteoporosis. METHODS: Administrative health claims data were used to determine monthly rates of BMD testing and initiation of osteoporosis medicines in the 9-months post-intervention among targeted men and women compared to older cohorts of men and women. Log binomial regression models were used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: In 2008 91,794 patients were targeted and 52,427 were targeted in 2011. There was a twofold increase in BMD testing after each intervention among targeted patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). Initiation of osteoporosis medicines increased by 21% among men targeted in 2008 and 34% among men targeted in 2011 compared to older controls (p < 0.01). Initiation of osteoporosis medicines among targeted women was similar to the older controls. CONCLUSION: Programs underpinned by behavioural theory and stakeholder engagement that target both primary care clinicians and patients can improve osteoporosis screening and management at the national level.

Achieving a sustained reduction in benzodiazepine use through implementation of an area-wide multi-strategic approach.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact, in a regional setting, of a multi-strategic partnership approach for reducing benzodiazepine use in the management of insomnia, as recommended in Australia's National Policy on Quality Use of Medicines. METHOD: The setting was a rural region of South Australia, covering approximately 2000 km2, with a population of over 20 000. The study involved participatory action research, with qualitative and quantitative evaluations. The intervention involved a multi-strategic approach, including provision of treatment guidelines, provision of consumer information, a local media campaign and education and training of health professionals. The quantitative evaluation involved a single region before/after study with 2 years of follow-up using pharmacy-based dispensing data for benzodiazepines and antidepressants, gathered for the months of November to April in 1998/99 ('before' period) through to 2000/01 ('after' period). The data were analysed using non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: There was a 19% reduction in benzodiazepine dispensing 2 years after the intervention compared with a 6% reduction nationally. Dispensing of antidepressants increased by 33%, compared with a 28% increase nationally. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the multi-strategic approach to the management of sleep disorders proved successful in promoting the use of non-drug alternatives, achieving sustained reduction in benzodiazepine consumption in a rural community, without therapeutic substitution of antidepressants. IMPLICATIONS: The study demonstrated that a sustainable reduction in prescribing of benzodiazepines can be achieved through the implementation of a multi-strategic approach involving local consumers, health professionals, a Division of General Practice, a government department, aged-care facilities and the local media.

Managing insomnia in the elderly - what prevents us using non-drug options?

OBJECTIVE: To identify strategies needed to increase use of non-drug interventions in the management of insomnia in the elderly. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 425 general practitioners (GPs) in the South Australian Southern Division of General Practice. To provide a consumer perspective, 16 older persons attended focus groups. RESULTS: Responses from 209 GPs showed the role of non-drug strategies in insomnia management was widely known, however access to and the usefulness of these strategies was less well known. GPs' perceptions of patients' expectations regarding medication were the greatest barrier. Patient inquiries about other options, patients' willingness to consider alternatives, printed information for patients on non-drug options, and step-by-step procedures to follow during consultations were considered enabling factors. Most consumers reported problems with sleeping but thought the GP could not help them with their sleep problems. In contrast to GPs' perceptions, consumers expressed interest in alternative treatments and willingness to participate in education sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to increase the use of non-drug alternatives need to provide GPs with information on access to, and the usefulness of, non-drug strategies. Consumers need concurrent education to inform them that GPs can help manage insomnia, and that they need to express willingness to trial non-drug strategies. Effective communication between GPs and consumers is paramount.