Assessment of general emergency medicine physicians' medical education regarding management of pediatric emergencies in western Normandy, France.

OBJECTIVES: General emergency medicine physicians sometimes have to deal with acute management of pediatric emergencies. The objectives of this study were to assess the pediatric medical education background of emergency physicians, how often they encounter pediatric emergencies, as well as the knowledge and organizational gaps regarding the management of children in general emergency departments. METHODS: A survey was conducted from March 25 to June 25, 2017, by emailing an anonymized questionnaire to all senior emergency physicians of the 22 general emergency departments of western Normandy public hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 81 responses were analyzed. In all, 83% percent of respondents had previously worked in a pediatric department. In total, 90% of the respondents reported caring for children within their emergency department and 93% out-of-hospital (100% of them during primary interventions and 39% during secondary interventions such as inter-hospital transfers). Fourteen percent of the respondents considered that the pediatric medical education they received was adapted to their current practice, while 73% reported experiencing difficulties during management of pediatric emergencies (technical difficulties, unsuitable material and therapeutics, relational problems, personal apprehension, disease- or age-specific difficulties, especially with children under the age of 2-3 years). CONCLUSION: Most general emergency physicians report caring for children despite a lack of medical education in pediatrics. Pediatric medical education as well as collaborations between general practitioners and specialized pediatric teams should be enhanced to better match the needs of general emergency departments and improve the quality of primary and acute care for children.

Increasing use of third-generation cephalosporins for pneumonia in the emergency department: may some prescriptions be avoided?

Third-generation cephalosporins are used to treat inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Some of these prescriptions may be avoided, i.e. replaced by agents less likely to promote ESBL-mediated resistance. Our objectives were to assess the recent trend of third-generation cephalosporins use for pneumonia in the emergency department, and the proportion of avoidable prescriptions. This was a retrospective study of patients treated for community-acquired pneumonia in an emergency department, and subsequently hospitalized in non ICU wards. Third-generation cephalosporin prescriptions were presumed unavoidable if they met both criteria: (i) age ≥ 65 yr or comorbid condition, and (ii) allergy or intolerance to penicillin, or failure of penicillin first-line therapy, or treatment with penicillin in three previous months. Prescriptions were otherwise deemed avoidable. The proportion of patients treated with a third generation cephalosporin increased significantly from 13.9 % (6.9-24.1 %) in 2002 to 29.5 % (18.5-42.6 %) in 2012 (OR = 1.07 [1.01-1.14] , P = 0.02). This increase was independent from other factors associated with the prescription of a third-generation cephalosporin (immunocompromising condition, antibacterial therapy in three previous months, fluid resuscitation and REA-ICU class). Treatment with third-generation cephalosporin was avoidable in 118 out of 147 patients (80.3 % [72.7-86.2 %]). On day 7 after admission in the ED, treatment with third-generation cephalosporins was stopped or de-escalated in, respectively, 17 % and 32 % of patients. Antibiotic stewardship programs should be implemented to restrict the third-generation cephalosporins use for pneumonia in the emergency department.