Iron therapy and severe arrhythmias in HFrEF: rationale, study design, and baseline results of the RESAFE-HF trial.

AIMS: The Iron Intravenous Therapy in Reducing the burden of Severe Arrhythmias in HFrEF (RESAFE-HF) registry study aims to provide real-word evidence on the impact of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on the arrhythmic burden of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), iron deficiency (ID), and implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: The RESAFE-HF (NCT04974021) study was designed as a prospective, single-centre, and open-label registry study with baseline, 3, 6, and 12 month visits. Adult patients with HFrEF and CIEDs scheduled to receive IV FCM as treatment for ID as part of clinical practice were eligible to participate. The primary endpoint is the composite iron-related endpoint of haemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL, ferritin ≥ 50 ng/L, and transferrin saturation > 20%. Secondary endpoints include unplanned HF-related hospitalizations, ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by CIEDs and Holter monitors, echocardiographic markers, functional status (VO2 max and 6 min walk test), blood biomarkers, and quality of life. In total, 106 patients with a median age of 72 years (14.4) were included. The majority were male (84.9%), whereas 92.5% of patients were categorized to New York Heart Association II/III. Patients' arrhythmic burden prior to FCM administration was significant-19 patients (17.9%) received appropriate CIED therapy for termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the preceding 12 months, and 75.5% of patients have frequent, repetitive multiform premature ventricular contractions. CONCLUSIONS: The RESAFE-HF trial is expected to provide evidence on the effect of treating ID with FCM in HFrEF based on real-world data. Special focus will be given on the arrhythmic burden post-FCM administration.

Iron polymaltose complexes: Could we spot physicochemical differences in medicines sharing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient?

Oral iron therapy can efficaciously treat both iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. To overcome the recurrent side effects of iron(II) salts, medicines containing iron(III) such as iron polymaltose complex (IPC) have been introduced in several markets. Despite the claimed improved safety versus iron(II) preparations, divergent evidences are currently available on IPC efficacy. Indeed, the use of either an originator drug or a follow-on version ("similar") of this medicine might result in different clinical performances. The aim of this work was the pioneer evaluation of physicochemical properties of IPC vs. iron polymaltose complex similars (IPCSs) as nanomedicines. This, to assess the presence of deviations for commercially available products supposedly containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient and currently considered as generics. Significant differences with respect to size, size distribution, stability and degradation kinetics of the products are reported here. Therapeutic equivalence of IPC and IPCSs is not proven, and new guidelines are needed to determine whether these nanomedicines can be regarded as interchangeable.

Oral versus intravenous iron therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and iron deficiency with and without anemia in Germany - a real-world evidence analysis.

BACKGROUND: Iron-deficiency anemia and iron deficiency are common comorbidities associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) resulting in impaired quality of life and high health care costs. Intravenous iron has shown clinical benefit compared to oral iron therapy. AIM: This study aimed to compare health care outcomes and costs after oral vs intravenous iron treatment for IBD patients with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia (ID/A) in Germany. METHODS: IBD patients with ID/A were identified by ICD-10-GM codes and newly commenced iron treatment via ATC codes in 2013 within the InGef (formerly Health Risk Institute) research claims database. Propensity score matching was performed to balance both treatment groups. Non-observable covariates were adjusted by applying the difference-in-differences (DID) approach. RESULTS: In 2013, 589 IBD patients with ID/A began oral and 442 intravenous iron treatment. After matching, 380 patients in each treatment group were analyzed. The intravenous group had fewer all-cause hospitalizations (37% vs 48%) and ID/A-related hospitalizations (5% vs 14%) than the oral iron group. The 1-year preobservation period comparison revealed significant health care cost differences between both groups. After adjusting for cost differences by DID method, total health care cost savings in the intravenous iron group were calculated to be €367. While higher expenditure for medication (€1,876) was observed in the intravenous iron group, the inpatient setting achieved most cost savings (€1,887). CONCLUSION: IBD patients receiving intravenous iron were less frequently hospitalized and incurred lower total health care costs compared to patients receiving oral iron. Higher expenditures for pharmaceuticals were compensated by cost savings in other domains.

Laser-assisted intradermal delivery of adjuvant-free vaccines targeting XCR1+ dendritic cells induces potent antitumoral responses.

The development of vaccines inducing efficient CD8(+) T cell responses is the focus of intense research. Dendritic cells (DCs) expressing the XCR1 chemokine receptor, also known as CD103(+) or CD8α(+) DCs, excel in the presentation of extracellular Ags to CD8(+) T cells. Because of its high numbers of DCs, including XCR1(+) DCs, the skin dermis is an attractive site for vaccine administration. By creating laser-generated micropores through the epidermis, we targeted a model protein Ag fused to XCL1, the ligand of XCR1, to dermal XCR1(+) DCs and induced Ag-specific CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell responses. Efficient immunization required the emigration of XCR1(+) dermal DCs to draining lymph nodes and occurred irrespective of TLR signaling. Moreover, a single intradermal immunization protected mice against melanoma tumor growth in prophylactic and therapeutic settings, in the absence of exogenous adjuvant. The mild inflammatory milieu created in the dermis by skin laser microporation itself most likely favored the development of potent T cell responses in the absence of exogenous adjuvants. The existence of functionally equivalent XCR1(+) dermal DCs in humans should permit the translation of laser-assisted intradermal delivery of a tumor-specific vaccine targeting XCR1(+) DCs to human cancer immunotherapy. Moreover, considering that the use of adjuvants in vaccines is often associated with safety issues, the possibility of inducing protective responses against melanoma tumor growth independently of the administration of exogenous adjuvants should facilitate the development of safer vaccines.