ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prior research has documented the inadequacy of pain management for trauma patients in the emergency department (ED), with rates of pain assessment and opioid administration averaging about 50%. Such rates, however, may be misleading and do not adequately capture the complexity of pain management practices in a trauma population. The goal of the study was to determine if pain was undertreated at the study hospital or if patient acuity explained the timing and occurrence of pain treatment in the prehospital setting and the ED. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a Level 1 adult trauma centre in the Midwest. The trauma registry was used to identify patients who received a trauma activation during the study period (June-November 2012; N=313). Using the first set of patient vitals and ISS, patients were grouped into three categories: physiologically stable with low injury severity (n=132); physiologically stable with moderate to severe injury (n=122); and physiologically unstable with severe injury (n=56). Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Patients who were physiologically unstable were the least likely to receive a standardised pain assessment and the least likely to receive an opioid in the ED. Patients who were physiologically stable at entry to the ED but sustained a severe injury were the most likely to receive an opioid. Time to first pain assessment and time to first opioid did not differ by patient acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm that patient acuity greatly affects the ability to effectively and appropriately manage pain in the initial hours after injury. This study contributes to the literature by noting areas for improvement but also in explaining why delaying pain treatment may be appropriate in certain patient populations.
