Validation of Visual Analogue Scale for loss of smell as a quick test in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic criteria of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) include, among others, olfactory dysfunction (OD). We hypothesize that patients suffering with CRSwNP are good at self-assessing their sense of smell through visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to smell tests. METHODS: A controlled cross-sectional study was planned. Adults diagnosed with severe CRSwNP waiting for endoscopic sinus surgery were included. A cohort of healthy controls was also studied. All participants performed Barcelona smell test (BAST-24), sinonasal outcomes test 22 (SNOT-22), and VAS for loss of smell. CRSwNP underwent blood test (eosinophils count, total serum IgE), CT scan (Lund-Mackay Score), and nasal endoscopy. RESULTS: 138 severe CRSwNP and 40 controls subjects were included. The BAST-24 identification score was strongly correlated with the VAS score in the CRSwNP group (rho=-0.79, p<0.001) but not in the control group (rho=-0.14; p=0.39), this difference between groups being statistically significant (p<0.001). A significant correlation of SNOT-22 item 21 (loss of smell) was also found with BAST-24 identification (rho=-0.65, p<0.001), this difference being statistically significant (Z=-2.43; p=0.015). In the ROC curve, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 with 72.5% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a potential role of the VAS score for the screening of OD in severe CRSwNP in daily clinical practice.

Septoplasty and/or inferior turbinoplasty produce significant improvements of the sense of smell.

BACKGROUND: Patients with septal deviation and/or turbinal hypertrophy may experience olfactory disfunction (OD). The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of septoplasty and/or turbinoplasty on both lateralized and bilateral olfactory function. METHODOLOGY: Prospective study of 47 patients with nasal obstruction secondary to septal deviation and/or turbinal hypertrophy and 20 healthy controls. The Barcelona Olfactory test (BOT-8), a new supraliminal orthonasal subjective olfactometry, was applied 3 times in a row (in each nostril separately and in both simultaneously). The 8 items were applied randomly to minimize the possible risk of learning. The test has not established the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Anterior rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed. All participants self-assessed smell loss and nasal obstruction using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and completed questionnaires for nasal obstruction (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, NOSE) and for quality of life (QoL), using disease-specific (SinoNasal Outcome Test-22, SNOT-22) and generic (Short Form-12 Health Survey, SF-12) questionnaires. Nasal measurements and questionnaires were performed preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, patients reported worse VAS on smell loss and on nasal obstruction compared to controls. Patients scored lower BOT-8 than controls. Lateralized preoperative olfactory function showed that all BOT-8 characteristics were lower at the narrow side than the wider one. Smell function and QoL improved significantly one year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal septal deviation and turbinal hypertrophy lead to an olfactory impairment on the obstructed nostril. Nasal surgery provides a positive outcome on olfactory function, as well as on subjective and objective outcomes.

Sinonasal mucosal melanomas: defining profiles for better survival outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 20% to 39%. Despite the evolving surgical and radiotherapy techniques, and introduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy, overall survival rates remain poor. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona and the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau between 1984 and 2020; primary outcome measures were 3 and 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were performed to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included, the mean age was 70.4, MSS at 3 and 5 years was 51.2%, and 29.5%, respectively. The median follow-up was 39.6 months during which 46% presented locoregional recurrence and 36%, metastasis. The univariate and multivariate analyses found as survival predictors the N category, the treatment received, the surgical margins and the mitotic index. CONCLUSIONS: We found an overall 5-year MSS of 29.5%. Those patients with intention-to-cure (stages III and IVa) treated by surgery that were N0 at diagnosis, with < 10 mitoses per HPF showed a 5-year MSS rate of 74.1%. More studies will be needed to adequately define the patients' profiles that will benefit from a better survival outcome.

The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. RESULTS: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). CONCLUSION: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test(BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. Results: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). Conclusions: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic (AU)

Introducción: Las olfatometrías son difíciles de implementar en la práctica clínica diaria por su larga duración. El objetivo del presente estudio fue desarrollar y validar una prueba simple, fácil y reutilizable para ser utilizada durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Se incluyeron 120 voluntarios sanos ≥18 años y 195 pacientes con disfunción olfatoria (DO) autoreportada. Se utilizó el Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) con 8 odorantes para la detección, memoria/reconocimiento e identificación. Además, se hizo una prueba de umbral de rosa (alcohol feniletílico) de 6 diluciones, escala visual analógica (EVA). Se compararon los resultados con una prueba validada Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT), para definir puntos de corte de hiposmia y anosmia se comparó en pacientes con DO con UPSITTM. Considerando la pandemia de COVID-19, se compararon hisopos de algodón desechables con los odorantes respecto a la prueba original. Resultados: BOT-8 se tarda entre 3 y 7 minutos en realizar. En población sana, la media de detección fue del 100%, memoria 94,5% (DE=1,07) e identificación 89,6% (DE=0,86). En pacientes con DO fue de 86% (DE=32,8), 73,2% (DE=37,9) y 77,1% (DE=34,2), respectivamente. BOT-8 demostró buena fiabilidad test-retest con 96,7% de concordancia observada y una kappa cuadrática de 0,84 (p<0,001). Presentó una fuerte correlación con SDOT (r=0,673, p <0,001) en población sana y con UPSITTM en pacientes con DO (r=0,86, p<0,001). Los hisopos de algodón desechables mostraron una excelente concordancia (kappa de 0,79) en comparación con la prueba original. El punto de corte para anosmia fue ≤ 3 (AUC=0,83, Se= 0,673, Sp=0,993) y de hiposmia ≤ 6 (AUC=0,451, Se= 0,088, Sp= 0,814). Conclusiones: BOT-8 ofrece un método eficiente y rápido para ser utilizado en la práctica clínica diaria para evaluar el sentido del olfato mediante la detección, memoria, identificación y umbral (AU)

Functional Examination of the Upper and Lower Airways in Asthma and Respiratory Allergic Diseases: Considerations in the Post-SARS-CoV-2 Era.

Airway examination procedures can potentially transmit infectious diseases to patients and to the health care professionals who perform them via various mechanisms. The COVID-19 pandemic has halted most of the activity of the clinics and laboratories involved in assessment of lung and nasal function, and clear recommendations in this regard have been made. Today, we still do not know for sure what its consequences will be in the short or long term, since important gaps remain in our knowledge of aspects as fundamental as virus transmission mechanisms, pathophysiology, immune response, and diagnosis. In this review, we study the examination techniques used to assess patients with respiratory allergy, asthma, and associated diseases during this period and highlight their possible advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we focus on exploring the entire upper and lower airways, from the perspective of the safety of both health professionals and patients and their specific characteristics. We also analyze the intrinsic value of these interventions in terms of diagnosis and patient management. The changing situation of COVID-19 may mean that some of the assertions presented in this review will have to be modified in the future. While we seek to ensure a consistently broad approach, some differences in operational details may apply owing to local regulations.

Smell and Taste Dysfunction in COVID-19 Is Associated With Younger Age in Ambulatory Settings: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since the initial anecdotal reports of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from China, a growing number of studies have reported on smell and/or taste dysfunction (STD). Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the frequency and severity of STD in COVID-19 patients and to evaluate the association with demographic characteristics, hospital admission, symptoms, comorbidities, and blood biomarkers. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional study on patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n=846) and controls (n=143) from 15 Spanish hospitals. Data on STD were collected prospectively using an in-person survey. The severity of STD was categorized using a visual analog scale. We analyzed time to onset, recovery rate, time to recovery, hospital admission, pneumonia, comorbidities, smoking, and symptoms. RESULTS: STD was at least 2-fold more common in COVID-19-positive patients than in controls. COVID-19-positive hospitalized patients were older, with a lower frequency of STD, and recovered earlier than outpatients. Analysis stratified by severity of STD showed that more than half of COVID-19 patients presented severe loss of smell (53.7%) or taste (52.2%); both senses were impaired in >90%. In the multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years), being hospitalized, and increased C-reactive protein were associated with a better sense of smell and/or taste. COVID-19-positive patients reported improvement in smell (45.6%) and taste (46.1%) at the time of the survey; in 90.6% this was within 2 weeks of infection. CONCLUSION: STD is a common symptom in COVID-19 and presents mainly in young and nonhospitalized patients. More studies are needed to evaluate follow-up of chemosensory impairment.

Olfactory Dysfunction in the COVID-19 Outbreak.

The first cases of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China, and the disease rapidly become a public health emergency of international proportions. COVID-19 can cause mild-to-severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, fatigue, sputum production, shortness of breath, sore throat, and headache. We performed this narrative review to analyze the current literature on postviral olfactory dysfunction related to the SARSCoV- 2 pandemic. Since the initial anecdotal reports from China, increasingly frequent international reports on COVID-19 indicate that 5% to 85% of affected patients lose their sense of smell, thus highlighting the very heterogeneous nature of the literature in this area. Therefore, we advise home isolation measures and/or social distancing, as well as tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 when possible, in patients with sudden and severe loss of smell who cannot be promptly evaluated.

Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test ̶ 6 (pBOT-6): Validation of a Combined Odor Identification and Threshold Screening Test in Healthy Spanish Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few odor tests have been developed for children. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a simple and quick olfactory test to evaluate odor identification and threshold in a Spanish pediatric population. METHODS: The Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test-6 (pBOT-6) consisted of a set of 6 odorants for a forced choice identification test and a 6-dilution phenyl ethyl alcohol geometric series for the threshold test. The pBOT-6 was compared with the Universal Sniff test (a validated international pediatric smell test) in 131 healthy Spanish volunteers aged 6-17 years. A Bland-Altman plot was used to determine the agreement between the 2 tests. Reliability was analyzed in 15 volunteers using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained, and 8 children diagnosed with subjective loss of smell were tested for validation. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a minimal bias of -1.71% with upper and lower limits of agreement of -31.1% and 27.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95%CI, 0.6-0.96) for the identification test and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.36-0.9) for the threshold test, with excellent and good consistency between measurements over time. Mean pBOT-6 scores were significantly higher in healthy volunteers than in patients with loss of smell. Discrimination between normosmia and loss of smell was achieved with a sensitivity of 96.9% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: pBOT-6 offers an effective and fast method that is useful in clinical routine to distinguish, with high sensitivity and specificity, between pediatric patients with normosmia and those with loss of smell.

Final results from the large sunitinib global expanded-access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We report final results with extended follow-up from a global, expanded-access trial that pre-regulatory approval provided sunitinib to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, ineligible for registration-directed trials. METHODS: Patients ⩾18 years received oral sunitinib 50 mg per day on a 4-weeks-on-2-weeks-off schedule. Safety was assessed regularly. Tumour measurements were scheduled per local practice. RESULTS: A total of 4543 patients received sunitinib. Median treatment duration and follow-up were 7.5 and 13.6 months. Objective response rate was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-17). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.0) and 18.7 months (95% CI: 17.5-19.5). Median PFS in subgroups of interest: aged ⩾65 years (33%), 10.1 months; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩾2 (14%), 3.5 months; non-clear cell histology (12%), 6.0 months; and brain metastases (7%), 5.3 months. OS was strongly associated with the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model (n=4065). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (10%), fatigue (9%), and asthenia, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome (each 7%). CONCLUSION: Final analysis of the sunitinib expanded-access trial provided a good opportunity to evaluate the long-term side effects of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used worldwide in mRCC. Efficacy and safety findings were consistent with previous results.

Sunitinib objective response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 1059 patients treated on clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective analyses were performed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) to characterise the objective response (OR) rate to sunitinib and differentiate pretreatment features and outcomes of patients with early (response by ≤ 12 weeks) versus late response, and responders versus non-responders. METHODS: Data were pooled from 1059 patients in six trials. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Brookmeyer and Crowley method and compared between groups by log-rank test. Baseline characteristics were compared by Fisher-exact, t-, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Associations between characteristics and survival were investigated by Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: 398 patients (38%) had confirmed OR (12 complete responses); 26%, 61%, 79% and 86% responded by 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks, respectively. Median (range) time to tumour response (TTR) was 10.6 (2.7-94.4) weeks and was similar in treatment-naïve and cytokine-refractory patients. Median response duration in early and late responders was 52.0 and 55.0 weeks, respectively. Median PFS in early versus late responders was 13.8 versus 20.2 months (P=0.001); however, median OS did not significantly differ (37.8 versus 40.8 months; P=0.144). Early responders had more lung metastases (P<0.01), but baseline characteristics were otherwise mostly similar. Median PFS (16.3 versus 5.3 months) and OS (40.1 versus 14.5 months) were longer in responders versus non-responders (both P<0.001); responders had more favourable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: OR occurred in 38% of sunitinib-treated mRCC patients. Sixty-one percent of responses occurred by 12 weeks of therapy, and responders had favourable pretreatment features and significantly longer survival.

Phase I study of sunitinib plus capecitabine/cisplatin or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of sunitinib plus capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) in Korean patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Sunitinib (37.5 or 25 mg/day) was administered on a 2-week-on/1-week-off schedule with chemotherapy. Assessments included dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received sunitinib/XP; 48 received sunitinib/XELOX. The MTDs were: sunitinib 25 mg/day, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 800 mg/m(2); and sunitinib 25 mg/day, oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2). DLTs at the MTDs comprised grade (G) 4 febrile neutropenia plus G3 diarrhea (n = 1; sunitinib/XP), dose delays due to hematologic toxicity (n = 2; both sunitinib/XP), G3 bleeding (menorrhagia; n = 1; sunitinib/XELOX), and G3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels (n = 1; sunitinib/XELOX). There was a high frequency of G3/4 hematologic adverse events observed with both treatment regimens, particularly with sunitinib/XP. Frequent non-hematologic, G3/4 adverse events were nausea, stomatitis, and hypophosphatemia with sunitinib/XP and hypophosphatemia and pulmonary embolism with sunitinib/XELOX. No drug-drug interactions were apparent. At the MTDs, median progression-free survival was 6.4 months and 5.5-8.0 months for sunitinib/XP and sunitinib/XELOX, respectively; and the objective response rate was 46.7% and 43.5-45.5% for sunitinib/XP and sunitinib/XELOX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the MTD, sunitinib/XELOX had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced GC.

A phase I, dose-finding study of sunitinib combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Background This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study examined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and methods Sunitinib (25 or 37.5 mg/day, Schedule 2/1: 2 weeks on treatment/1 week off) plus chemotherapy (fixed starting doses of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 4,000 mg/m(2)) was administered to patients with advanced gastric cancer who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease. Results Thirty-four patients were enrolled and received sunitinib 25 mg/day (n = 24) or 37.5 mg/day (n = 10) plus chemotherapy. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported in the sunitinib 37.5 mg cohort. However, repeated patterns of myelosuppression beyond the first cycle led to investigation of sunitinib 25 mg/day. This was the MTD, and one DLT (grade 3 mucosal inflammation) was reported. The combination had an acceptable adverse event profile; generally of grade 1/2. There was no evidence of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between sunitinib and 5-FU. Six patients (26 %) receiving the MTD had a partial response and eight patients experienced stable disease ≥3 months. Conclusions Sunitinib plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 4,000 mg/m(2) were combinable and adverse events were manageable. The MTD of sunitinib was established as 25 mg/day on Schedule 2/1.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies of PNU-159548, a novel alkycycline, administered intravenously to patients with advanced solid tumours.

PNU-159548 (4-demethoxy-3'-deamino-3'-aziridinyl-4'-methylsulphonyl-daunorubicin) is the lead compound of a novel class of cytotoxic agents (alkycyclines) with a unique mechanism of action combining DNA intercalation with alkylation of guanines in the DNA major groove. The objectives of two phase I studies were to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to study the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of PNU-159548 and its active metabolite PNU-169884 when administered intravenously (i.v.) over 10 or 60 min to patients with advanced solid tumours. Patients were treated with escalating doses of PNU-159548, courses repeated every 21 days at doses ranging from 1.0 to 16 mg/m(2). For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma sampling was performed during the first course and assayed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. 69 patients received a total of 161 courses. The MTD was reached at 14 and 16 mg/m(2) in heavily (HP) and minimally pretreated/non-pretreated (MP) patients, respectively, with thrombocytopenia as the DLT. A hypersensitivity reaction was observed in 8 patients across all dose levels, characterised by fever with chills, erythema, facial oedema and dyspnoea. The PKs of PNU-159548 and PNU-169884 were linear over the dose range studied. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in platelet count and the AUC of PNU-159548. In these studies, the DLT of PNU-159548 was thrombocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies of PNU-159548 is 12 and 14 mg/m(2) administered i.v. over 10 min, once every 21 days, in HP and MP patients, respectively.

PNU-145156E, a novel angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study.

Our aim was to establish, in patients with solid tumors, the dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacology of PNU-145156E, a new sulfonated distamycin A derivative that blocked circulating angiogenesis-promoting growth factors in animal studies and exhibited an antitumor effect in murine solid tumors. In a Phase I study, PNU-145156E was administered i.v. every 6 weeks. Included were patients with solid tumors; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score

Treatment of pre-menopausal advanced breast cancer with goserelin--a long-acting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist.

Twenty-two pre-menopausal evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer (median age 39 years; ER positive 19, unknown three; prior adjuvant chemotherapy 16) were treated with the LHRH agonist goserelin depot (Zoladex). Serum levels of 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone were suppressed by goserelin within 3-4 weeks of therapy, while serum leuteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone titers remained in the low level of the normal range. Complete or partial response was documented in seven of 22 cases (32%) and occurred in all major sites of disease. Tumor response was documented in women regularly menstruating at the start of therapy. Median time to disease progression was 23 weeks; median duration of response was 64 weeks; overall survival was 141 weeks. Zoladex was well tolerated: only hot flushes in 82% and reversible cutaneous pigmentation in the site of injection in 45% of the patients were observed. In our experience the activity of Zoladex was comparable to that of oophorectomy, without the psychological trauma and the morbidity related to surgical castration.

Medical castration with zoladex: a conservative approach to premenopausal breast cancer.

For almost a century surgical castration represented the initial standard therapy for metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women with hormone dependent tumors. Today the suppression of ovarian function can also be obtained by the administration of supraphysiologic doses of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. From April 1987 to February 1989, 23 premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer (median age 39 years, range 28-52, ER positive 20, unknown 3; prior chemotherapy 17) were treated with the LHRH agonist goserelin depot (Zoladex) at the dose of 3.6 mg. every 4 weeks. Twenty-two patients were evaluable. Serum levels of 17 beta estradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH were suppressed by goserelin and fell to postmenopausal values within 8 weeks of therapy in 77% of cases. Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) was documented in 7 of 22 (32%) and occurred in all major sites of disease. Five patients achieved CR (soft tissue 3, viscera 2). Response rate was higher in patients not previously treated with chemotherapy (4/6). In the present series, all responses were seen in women greater than 35 years old, regularly menstruating at the start of treatment. Time to progression for the entire case series was 22 weeks and for responders 64 weeks. Oophorectomy was performed after disease progression in four patients without success. Goserelin was well tolerated. Local cutaneous dyschromia occurred in 45% and hot flushes in 82%. Treatment efficacy of goserelin is comparable to that of oophorectomy, without the psychological trauma and the morbidity related to surgical castration.