Healthcare resource utilization and costs in stable patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Comparing nurse-led and rheumatologist-led models of care delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Having previously shown similar clinical outcomes, this study compared the healthcare resource utilization and direct costs in stable patients with RA followed in the nurse-led care (NLC) and rheumatologist-led care (RLC) models. METHODS: Previously collected clinical data were linked to data on practitioner claims, ambulatory care, and hospital discharges. Assessed resources included physician visits; emergency department (ED) visits; hospital admissions, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The mean per-patient resource utilization and cost (2020 Canadian dollars) over 1 year were compared between the groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The mean per-patient cost of health services and total cost were also estimated using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) accounting for the baseline differences between the groups. RESULTS: Overall, 244 patients were included. No differences in the number of visits to the ED or to general practice and internal medicine physicians and orthopedic surgeons were found. The NLC group had fewer hospitalizations than the RLC group (p-value=0.03). The mean cost of health services was not statistically different in NLC and RLC groups ($2275 vs. $3772, p-value=0.30). The RLC group included more patients on biologic DMARDs, contributing to a higher mean total cost than the NLC group ($9191 vs. $3056, p-value<0.01). The mean cost estimates with GLMs were consistent with the observed costs. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-led model of care delivery for stable patients with RA was not associated with increases in healthcare resource utilization or cost as compared to RLC. NLC is one approach to meeting patient needs and better managing scarce healthcare resources.

Canadian Rheumatology Association recommendations for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: part II safety.

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) has developed recommendations for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in 2 parts. Part II, focusing on specific safety aspects of treatment with traditional and biologic DMARD in patients with RA, is reported here. METHODS: Key questions were identified a priori based on results of a national needs-assessment survey. A systematic review of all clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding treatment with traditional and biologic DMARD in patients with RA published between January 2000 and June 2010 was performed in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases, and was supplemented with a "grey literature" search including relevant public health guidelines. Systematic reviews of postmarketing surveillance and RA registry studies were performed to update included guideline literature reviews as appropriate. Guideline quality was independently assessed by 2 reviewers. Guideline characteristics, recommendations, and supporting evidence from observational studies and randomized trials were synthesized into evidence tables. The working group voted on recommendations using a modified Delphi technique. RESULTS: Thirteen recommendations addressing perioperative care, screening for latent tuberculosis infection prior to the initiation of biologic DMARD, optimal vaccination practices, and treatment of RA patients with active or a history of malignancy were developed for rheumatologists, other primary prescribers of RA drug therapies, and RA patients. CONCLUSION: These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of international RA and public health guidelines, supporting evidence, and expert consensus in the context of the Canadian health system. They are intended to help promote best practices and improve healthcare delivery for persons with RA.

Canadian Rheumatology Association recommendations for pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) has developed recommendations for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in 2 parts. Part 1 is reported here. METHODS: The CRA Therapeutics Committee assembled a national working group of RA clinical experts, researchers, patient consumers, and a general practitioner. Treatment questions were developed a priori based on results of a national needs assessment survey. A systematic review of all clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding treatment with traditional and biologic DMARD in patients with RA published between January 2000 and June 2010 was performed in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases, and the grey literature. Guideline quality was assessed by 2 independent reviewers, and guideline characteristics, recommendations, and supporting evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials were synthesized into evidence tables. The full working group reviewed the evidence tables and developed recommendations using a modified Delphi technique. RESULTS: Five overarching principles and 26 recommendations addressing general RA management strategies and treatment with glucocorticoids and traditional and biologic DMARD were developed for rheumatologists, other primary prescribers of RA drug therapies, and patients with RA. CONCLUSION: These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of international guidelines, supporting evidence, and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context with the intention of promoting best practices and improving healthcare delivery for persons with RA.

The development of inflammatory arthritis and other rheumatic diseases following stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the use of stem cell transplantation (SCT) to treat inflammatory arthritis and other rheumatic diseases, case reports of the paradoxical development of these diseases after SCT are appearing. Three cases of inflammatory arthritis developing after SCT were seen at our institution, leading to a literature review to determine the association between SCT and the de novo development of rheumatic conditions. METHODS: Using PubMed and manual searches of references from pertinent articles, the literature pertaining to the onset of rheumatic conditions following SCT was identified. RESULTS: Case reports detailing the onset of rheumatoid arthritis, HLA-B27-related spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, eosinophilic fasciitis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, as well as polyarthritis related to intercedent viral infection were identified. Failure of transmission of autoimmune disease from donor to recipient in 2 case reports is also summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rheumatic disease development after SCT is unknown, and reported cases may simply reflect those patients who were predisposed to disease development in the first place. However, immunologic manipulation during the SCT process raises the question of whether there is an increased propensity to develop autoimmune disease posttransplant. Clinical vigilance in the recognition of phenotypic changes and clinical events occurring after SCT which may represent new autoimmune phenomena is required.

Rapid responses to anakinra in patients with refractory adult-onset Still's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of anakinra treatment in patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) that is refractory to corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), and etanercept. METHODS: Four patients with AOSD were treated with prednisone and MTX and 2 patients were also treated with etanercept for worsening symptoms and indicators of systemic inflammation. White blood cells (WBCs), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and ferritin levels were measured and, in 1 patient, serum creatinine levels were determined. Treatment with anakinra at 100 mg/day was initiated. RESULTS: The index patient's disease was refractory to treatment with prednisone (30 mg/day) and MTX, with spiking fevers, rash, synovitis, a serum ferritin level of 8,400 ng/ml (normal 20,000/mm(3) with prominent neutrophilia, the CRP level rose to >200 mg/liter, and the ferritin level rose to >3,000 ng/ml. Upon restarting anakinra, the patient became afebrile, the WBC count fell to 8,000/mm(3), the CRP level fell to <3 mg/liter, and the ferritin level fell to <300 ng/ml. Three additional patients with refractory AOSD who experienced rapid reductions in fever, symptoms, and markers of inflammation when treated with anakinra are reported. CONCLUSION: Refractory AOSD appears to be IL-1-mediated since anakinra decreases hematologic, biochemical, and cytokine markers and also produces rapid reductions in systemic and local inflammation. Reported efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-blocking therapies in AOSD may be due to a reduction in IL-1.