The dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant, alone and in combination with morphine, cocaine and amphetamine, on conditioned place preference and locomotor sensitization in the rat.

Dual orexin receptor (OXR) antagonists emerge as a novel therapeutic class to treat insomnia that, based on anti-addictive effects of selective OXR type 1 antagonists in rats, might be associated with less abuse liability than commonly used γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor modulators. Here, we studied the effects of the sleep-enabling dual OXR antagonist almorexant on conditioned place preference (CPP) and locomotor sensitization in rats. First, we compared almorexant to the GABA metabolite γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), which is clinically used as a sleep-inducing drug and which is associated with mild abuse liability. Whereas conditioning with GHB induced significant place preference, conditioning with almorexant did not. Second, we tested the potential of almorexant to interfere with the conditioned rewarding or locomotor sensitizing effects related to psychostimulants or opiates. Almorexant attenuated the expression of CPP to high doses of cocaine (15 mg/kg) and d.l-amphetamine (2 mg/kg), but not to high dose of morphine (10 mg/kg). Conversely, almorexant interfered with the expression of locomotor sensitization to morphine, but not with that to cocaine and d.l-amphetamine. Third, we observed that chronic almorexant (12 d) treatment in morphine, cocaine or amphetamine pre-conditioned and locomotor-sensitized rats had no influence on the maintenance of CPP and locomotor sensitization when tested after almorexant washout. Our findings suggest that almorexant itself does not exert conditioned rewarding effects in the rat and that it may acutely interfere with the expression of CPP or locomotor sensitization in a drug-dependent manner (monoaminergic psychostimulants vs. opiates).

The brain orexin system and almorexant in fear-conditioned startle reactions in the rat.

RATIONALE: The rat fear-potentiated startle (FPS) paradigm is a translational model of conditioned fear involving central amygdala pathways of the brain. Hypothalamic orexin neurons have input-output projections to the amygdala; they modulate vigilance and stress-related responses. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the transient pharmacological blockade of orexin receptors moderates the conditioned fear response. METHODS: F344 rats received acute oral treatment with the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant (30-300 mg/kg) or with one of the clinically effective anxiolytics diazepam (1-10 mg/kg), buspirone (10-100 mg/kg), fluoxetine (3-30 mg/kg), and sertraline (10-100 mg/kg). Drug effects on startle responses were assessed in both fear- and non-fear-conditioned rats; on forepaw grip and horizontal wire motor performance, and on elevated plus maze (EPM) behavior. RESULTS: Diazepam and almorexant both dose-dependently decreased FPS in the presence of the fear-conditioned stimulus (CS; light) more prominently than background startle in absence of the CS (dark). Diazepam induced myorelaxation and reduced startle responses in control non-fear-conditioned rats. Almorexant had no myorelaxant effects and left startle responses under light in non-fear-conditioned rats intact. On the EPM, diazepam showed anxiolytic-like effects, almorexant not. Buspirone demonstrated anxiolytic-like effects on FPS by simultaneously reducing CS-related startle and increasing no-CS-background startle. Fluoxetine did not affect FPS, whereas sertraline showed anxiogenic-like effects. CONCLUSIONS: Almorexant reduced FPS, but did not affect EPM behavior. Almorexant's overall pattern of effects on FPS was comparable to but less pronounced than that of the anxiolytic benzodiazepine diazepam. The endogenous orexin system actively contributes to fear-conditioned startle reactions in the rat.

Favoured genetic background for testing anxiolytics in the fear-potentiated and light-enhanced startle paradigms in the rat.

The fear-potentiated startle (FPS) and the light-enhanced startle (LES) paradigms are rodent tests of fear and anxiety, which combine face validity with predictive validity for clinically effective anxiolytic drugs. However, systematic strain comparisons aimed at identifying a rat strain that shows robust and reliable fear and anxiety responses in both models are missing. Here, we investigated four commonly used laboratory rat strains: Wistar, Sprague Dawley, Long-Evans and F344. Following strong cued fear conditioning training [60 conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) pairings], all strains except Wistar exhibited significant FPS responses. F344 rats showed the strongest FPS response. Following milder cued fear conditioning protocols, designed to reduce the underlying component of contextual fear conditioning (by context pre-exposure or less CS-US pairings), also Wistar rats were able to show significant FPS, albeit still to a lesser extent than F344 rats tested under identical conditions. When tested in the LES protocol (light intensity ∼ 1500 lx), all strains except Long-Evans displayed significant light-enhanced startle responses. F344 and Wistar showed the strongest LES responses, which were of similar magnitude. The most sensitive strain in both paradigms, F344, was chosen for further pharmacological validation. The clinically active anxiolytic alprazolam (0.3, 1, 3mg/kg p.o.) dose-dependently reduced both fear-like responses in the FPS paradigm and anxiety-like responses in the LES paradigm at non-myorelaxant dosages. We propose that the F344 rat strain is particularly suited for the predictability assessment of novel anxiolytic drugs in both startle paradigms.

Differential effects of the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant and the GABA(A)-α1 receptor modulator zolpidem, alone or combined with ethanol, on motor performance in the rat.

Current insomnia treatments such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor modulators are associated with sedative and muscle-relaxant effects, which increase when drug intake is combined with alcohol. This study compared the novel sleep-enabling compound almorexant (ACT-078573-hydrochloride), a dual orexin receptor antagonist, with the positive GABA(A)-α1 receptor modulator zolpidem. Both compounds were administered alone or in combination with ethanol, and their effects on forced motor performance were determined in Wistar rats upon waking after treatment. To detect substance-induced sedation and myorelaxation, time spent on an accelerating rotating rod (rotarod) and forepaw grip strength were measured. Zolpidem (10, 30, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) and ethanol (0.32, 1, and 1.5 g/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently decreased rotarod performance and grip strength, whereas almorexant (30, 100, and 300 mg/kg, p.o.) did not. Doses of ethanol (0.32 and 1 g/kg), which were ineffective when administered alone, showed interactions with zolpidem (10 and 30 mg/kg) leading to reduced rotarod performance and grip strength; in contrast, combination of ethanol (0.32 and 1 g/kg) with almorexant (100 and 300 mg/kg) did not reduce performance or grip strength below ethanol alone. We conclude that unlike zolpidem, almorexant does not interfere with forced motor performance or grip strength in the rat, nor does it further increase the sedative effects of ethanol. Our results suggest that the effect of almorexant can be immediately reversed to full alertness like under physiological sleep, and that almorexant is less likely to show strong sedation, excessive myorelaxation, or interaction with alcohol than commonly prescribed hypnotics such as zolpidem.

Preclinical evidence that sildenafil and vardenafil activate chloride transport in cystic fibrosis.

RATIONALE: Sildenafil has been implicated in the activation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The effect was observed in vitro and in the presence of doses roughly 300 times larger than those commonly used for treating erectile dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in vivo the therapeutic efficacy of clinical doses of sildenafil and vardenafil, two clinically approved phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, for activating ion transport in cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We used transepithelial potential difference in vivo across the nasal mucosa as a measure of sodium and chloride transport. The effect of a single intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil (0.7 mg/kg) or vardenafil (0.14 mg/kg) was investigated in F508del, cftr knockout and normal homozygous mice. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In F508del mice, but not in cftr knockout mice, the chloride conductance, evaluated by perfusing the nasal mucosa with a chloride-free solution in the presence of amiloride and with forskolin, was corrected 1 hour after sildenafil administration. A more prolonged effect, persisting for at least 24 hours, was observed with vardenafil. The forskolin response was increased after sildenafil and vardenafil in both normal and F508del mutant animals. In F508del mice, the chloride conductance in the presence of 200 microM 4-4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulphonic acid, an inhibitor of alternative chloride channels, was much higher after sildenafil injection than after placebo treatment. No effect on the sodium conductance was detected in any group of animals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide preclinical evidence that both drugs stimulate chloride transport activity of F508del-CFTR protein.