Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 182(3): 289-301, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26332605

ABSTRACT

VRC-HIVMAB060-00-AB (VRC01) is a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) isolated from the B cells of an HIV-infected patient. It is directed against the HIV-1 CD4 binding site and is capable of potently neutralizing the majority of diverse HIV-1 strains. This Phase I dose-escalation study in healthy adults was conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD, USA). Primary objectives were the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of VRC01 intravenous (i.v.) infusion at 5, 20 or 40 mg/kg, given either once (20 mg/kg) or twice 28 days apart (all doses), and of subcutaneous (s.c.) delivery at 5 mg/kg compared to s.c. placebo given twice, 28 days apart. Cumulatively, 28 subjects received 43 VRC01 and nine received placebo administrations. There were no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. Mean 28-day serum trough concentrations after the first infusion were 35 and 57 µg/ml for groups infused with 20 mg/kg (n = 8) and 40 mg/kg (n = 5) doses, respectively. Mean 28-day trough concentrations after the second infusion were 56 and 89 µg/ml for the same two doses. Over the 5-40 mg/kg i.v. dose range (n = 18), the clearance was 0.016 l/h and terminal half-life was 15 days. After infusion VRC01 retained expected neutralizing activity in serum, and anti-VRC01 antibody responses were not detected. The human monoclonal antibody (mAb) VRC01 was well tolerated when delivered i.v. or s.c. The mAb demonstrated expected half-life and pharmacokinetics for a human immunoglobulin G. The safety and PK results support and inform VRC01 dosing schedules for planning HIV-1 prevention efficacy studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Neutralizing , HIV Antibodies , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Neutralizing/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/adverse effects , Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , HIV Antibodies/administration & dosage , HIV Antibodies/adverse effects , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 19(11): 1792-7, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22956656

ABSTRACT

Avian influenza virus causes outbreaks in domestic and wild birds around the world, and sporadic human infections have been reported. A DNA vaccine encoding hemagglutinin (HA) protein from the A/Indonesia/5/05 (H5N1) strain was initially tested in two randomized phase I clinical studies. Vaccine Research Center study 304 (VRC 304) was a double-blinded study with 45 subjects randomized to placebo, 1 mg of vaccine, or 4 mg of vaccine treatment groups (n = 15/group) by intramuscular (i.m.) Biojector injection. VRC 305 was an open-label study to evaluate route, with 44 subjects randomized to intradermal (i.d.) injections of 0.5 mg by needle/syringe or by Biojector or 1 mg delivered as two 0.5-mg Biojector injections in the same deltoid or as 0.5 mg in each deltoid (n = 11/group). Injections were administered at weeks 0, 4, and 8 in both studies. Antibody responses to H5 were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and neutralization assay, and the H5 T cell responses were assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot and intracellular cytokine staining assays. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events, and the vaccine was well tolerated in all groups. At 1 mg, i.d. vaccination compared to i.m. vaccination induced a greater frequency and magnitude of response by ELISA, but there were no significant differences in the frequency or magnitude of response between the i.d. and i.m. routes in the HAI or neutralization assays. T cell responses were more common in subjects who received the 1- or 4-mg dose i.m. These studies demonstrated that the DNA vaccine encoding H5 is safe and immunogenic and served to define the proper dose and route for further studies. The i.d. injection route did not offer a significant advantage over the i.m. route, and no difference was detected by delivery to one site versus splitting the dose between two sites for i.d. vaccine administration. The 4-mg dose (i.m) was further investigated in prime-boost regimens.


Subject(s)
Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cytokines/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Female , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/genetics , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/genetics , Injections, Intradermal , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Neutralization Tests , Placebos/administration & dosage , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccines, DNA/genetics , Young Adult
3.
Vaccine ; 29(2): 304-13, 2010 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21034824

ABSTRACT

Ebola virus causes irregular outbreaks of severe hemorrhagic fever in equatorial Africa. Case mortality remains high; there is no effective treatment and outbreaks are sporadic and unpredictable. Studies of Ebola virus vaccine platforms in non-human primates have established that the induction of protective immunity is possible and safety and human immunogenicity has been demonstrated in a previous Phase I clinical trial of a 1st generation Ebola DNA vaccine. We now report the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) vaccine encoding the envelope glycoprotein (GP) from the Zaire and Sudan Ebola virus species, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, dose escalation, Phase I human study. Thirty-one healthy adults received vaccine at 2×10(9) (n=12), or 2×10(10) (n=11) viral particles or placebo (n=8) as an intramuscular injection. Antibody responses were assessed by ELISA and neutralizing assays; and T cell responses were assessed by ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining assays. This recombinant Ebola virus vaccine was safe and subjects developed antigen specific humoral and cellular immune responses.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Human/genetics , Ebola Vaccines/immunology , Genetic Vectors , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Viral Envelope Proteins/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cytokines/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Ebola Vaccines/adverse effects , Ebola Vaccines/genetics , Ebolavirus/genetics , Ebolavirus/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neutralization Tests , Placebos/administration & dosage , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/genetics , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Young Adult
4.
J Immunol Methods ; 362(1-2): 180-4, 2010 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20727896

ABSTRACT

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of respiratory infection in people of all ages, and is the leading cause of hospitalization in infants. Although commercially available monoclonal antibody is available for passive prophylaxis of neonates at risk of severe disease, there is no available vaccine to prevent RSV. Measurement of neutralizing activity will be a key endpoint for vaccine evaluation. Assessment of neutralizing antibody against RSV has been limited to traditional plaque reduction, which is time-consuming and inherently operator dependent and highly variable. Here, we describe a flow cytometry-based RSV-specific neutralization assay which is more rapid than traditional methods, highly sensitive and highly reproducible.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Flow Cytometry/methods , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/blood , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Cell Line , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...