Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 42(5): 280-7, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20968224

ABSTRACT

How body position influences brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in critically ill neurosurgical patients remains poorly defined. In a prospective observational repeated measures study, we examined the effects of 12 different body positions on neurodynamic and hemodynamic outcomes. Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean +/- SD, age = 48.3 +/- 16.6 years; 22 men), admitted after traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or craniotomy for tumor, were evaluated in a neurocritical care unit at a level 1 academic trauma center. Patients were eligible if the admission score in the Glasgow Coma Scale was < or =8 and they had a Licox CMP Monitoring System (Integra Neurosciences, Plainsboro, NJ). Patients were exposed to all 12 positions in random order. Changes from baseline to the 15-minute postposition assessment mean change scores showed a downward trend for PbtO2 for all positions with statistically significant decreases observed for supine head of bed (HOB) elevated 30 degrees and 45 degrees (p < .01) and right and left lateral positioning HOB 30 degrees (p < .05). ICP decreased with supine HOB 45 degrees (p < .01) and knee elevation, HOB 30 degrees and 45 degrees (p < .05), and increased (p < .05) with right and left lateral HOB 15 degrees. Hemodynamic parameters were similar in the various positions. Positioning practices can positively or negatively affect PbtO2 and ICP and fluctuate with considerable variability among patients. Nurses must consider potential effects of turning, evaluate changes with positioning on the basis of monitoring feedback from multimodality devices, and make independent clinical judgments about optimal positions to maintain or improve cerebral oxygenation.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Brain/physiology , Critical Care/methods , Oxygen/metabolism , Posture/physiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Blood Pressure/physiology , Brain Injuries/metabolism , Brain Injuries/nursing , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Clinical Nursing Research , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 37(5): 278-88, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16379135

ABSTRACT

When a new technology is introduced it is important to empower the bedside practitioner with a resource tool that outlines the purpose, placement procedure, technology application guidelines, and interventions associated with that new technology. This promotes product and patient safety and successful implementation of the new technology. Continued evaluation of bedside clinical practice and the technology used in the care and treatment of the severe brain injured patient can lead to improvements in management and in technology design. Future clinical research initiatives exploring the impact of new technology will enable us to discover cost-effective treatments and interventions that will improve the outcome for a person with traumatic brain injury, a condition that devastates hundreds of thousands of Americans each year.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Hypoxia, Brain/diagnosis , Intracranial Pressure , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Oxygen/blood , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Specialties, Nursing/instrumentation , Specialties, Nursing/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...