Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 29(1): 31-38, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36810238

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) social distancing measures on fracture incidence and fracture-related mortality, as well as associations with population mobility. METHODS: In total, 47 186 fractures were analysed across 43 public hospitals from 22 November 2016 to 26 March 2020. Considering the smartphone penetration of 91.5% in the study population, population mobility was quantified using Apple Inc's Mobility Trends Report, an index of internet location services usage volume. Fracture incidences were compared between the first 62 days of social distancing measures and corresponding preceding epochs. Primary outcomes were associations between fracture incidence and population mobility, quantified by incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Secondary outcomes included fracture-related mortality rate (death within 30 days of fracture) and associations between emergency orthopaedic healthcare demand and population mobility. RESULTS: Overall, 1748 fewer fractures than projected were observed during the first 62 days of COVID-19 social distancing (fracture incidence: 321.9 vs 459.1 per 100 000 person-years, P<0.001); the relative risk was 0.690, compared with mean incidences during the same period in the previous 3 years. Population mobility exhibited significant associations with fracture incidence (IRR=1.0055, P<0.001), fracture-related emergency department attendances (IRR=1.0076, P<0.001), hospital admissions (IRR=1.0054, P<0.001), and subsequent surgery (IRR=1.0041, P<0.001). Fracture-related mortality decreased from 4.70 (in prior years) to 3.22 deaths per 100 000 person-years during the COVID-19 social distancing period (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Fracture incidence and fracture-related mortality decreased during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic; they demonstrated significant temporal associations with daily population mobility, presumably as a collateral effect of social distancing measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , Epidemiologic Studies , Hospitalization
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 108: 81-89, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restricting urine culture to patients with genuine urinary tract infection (UTI) reduces excessive antimicrobial prescription for asymptomatic bacteriuria. AIM: To evaluate the impact of urine culture diagnostic stewardship on antimicrobial consumption. METHODS: This quasi-study involved two general hospitals and 10 community clinics. In the pre-intervention (control) phase (25th November 2018-2nd February 2019), microscopy and culture results of all urine specimens were reported. In the post-intervention (study) phase (25th November 2019-2nd February 2020), urine cultures were processed and reported only if at least one of the following criteria were met: presence of white blood cells or bacteria on microscopy; patient from obstetrics, urology, paediatrics, oncology or renal transplant ward; specimen labelled as 'pregnancy', 'urological procedure', 'renal transplant' or 'neutropenic'; and ureteric, nephrostomy or suprapubic urine. For urine samples that did not fulfil these criteria, the microscopy results and a rejection comment were reported. FINDINGS: In total, 12,282 urine specimens were included in the intervention phase. Of these, 4757 (38.7%) specimens did not fulfil the screening criteria, and the microscopy result and a rejection comment were reported. One hundred and sixty-three (3.4%) of these non-reported urine cultures yielded significant bacterial growth, and the majority were Escherichia coli (N=58, 35.6%). Diagnostic stewardship was independently associated with lower antimicrobial consumption [adjusted odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.83, P<0.001] on multi-variable logistic regression across all healthcare settings. Diagnostic stewardship had no effect on patient mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01, P=0.08). No patients with unreported urine culture developed bacteraemia from untreated UTI. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic stewardship of urine culture safely reduced excessive antimicrobial prescription for asymptomatic bacteriuria.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Urinalysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...